|
Client |
Territory Development Department, |
|||
|
Project |
Supplementary Agreement No. 3 to Agreement No. CE 15/94 Design and Construction for the Minimum Option |
|||
|
Report
No. |
3128-REP-133-01 |
|||
|
Date of Issue |
|
File
Ref. L:\S-proj\CR3\CR3.NEW\3128\ Reports\0133_01.doc |
||
|
Report Title |
Baseline Environmental Monitoring
Report (Final) |
|||
|
|
Name |
Sign |
Date |
|
|
Prepared
by : |
Albert
Chan |
|
|
|
|
Reviewed by : |
Susana
Bezy |
|
|
|
|
Authorised by : |
Jon
Varndell |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Distribution |
|
|
||
|
Copy No |
Issue to |
Attention |
Corr. Ref. |
|
|
1
- 2 |
TDD |
Mr
H H Yeung |
3128/124/OC4776/al |
|
|
3
- 5 |
EPD |
Mr
Thomas To |
3128/124/OC4776/al |
|
|
6 |
EPD
(WP& PG) |
Ms
W Leung |
3128/124/OC4776/al |
|
|
7 |
IEC |
Mr
Bill Douglas |
3128/124/OC4776/al |
|
|
8 |
ET
Leader |
Ms
Susana Bezy |
3128/124/OC4776/al |
|
|
9 |
RSS |
Mr
Douglas Miller |
3128/124/OC4776/al |
|
|
10 |
LCSVO-JV |
Mr
Malcolm Plummer |
3128/124/OC4776/al |
|
|
11
- 12 |
Office
Copy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.12 Comparison Of EPD Routine Monitoring Data With Baseline Monitoring.................... 43
List of Figures
Figure 2.1 Dust and Noise Monitoring Stations
Figure 4.2 Water Quality Monitoring Stations at Representative Sea Water Intakes
Figure 4.3 Marine Based Water Quality Monitoring Stations
List of Annexes
Annex A Air Quality Monitoring Data
Annex B Graphical Representation of Dust Monitoring Results
Annex D Correspondence with Seawater Intake Operators
Annex F Water Quality Monitoring Data
Annex G Graphical Presentation of Baseline Water Quality Monitoring Data
Annex H Statistical Analysis of Baseline Monitoring Results
Annex I Graphical Presentation of EPD Routine Monitoring Data
Annex J Intake Operator Correspondence on Water Quality Criteria for Intakes
List of Tables
Table 2.1- Air Quality Monitoring Programme at City Hall
Station.................................................. 6
Table 2.2 - Air Quality Monitoring Programme at PLA Station........................................................ 7
Table 2.3 - Equipment
Used for Dust Monitoring.......................................................................... 9
Table 2.4 – Summary of Baseline Air Quality Monitoring
Results................................................. 10
Table 2.5 - Air Quality Action and Limit
Levels for the City Hall Monitoring Station.................... 11
Table 2.6 – Air Quality Action and Limit Levels for the PLA
Monitoring Station............................ 11
Table 2.7 – Event and Action Plan for Air Quality......................................................................... 13
Table 3.1 – Noise Monitoring Equipment..................................................................................... 15
Table 3.2 – Noise Quality Monitoring Programme at City Hall
Station......................................... 16
Table 3.3 - Summary of Baseline Noise Quality Monitoring
Results.............................................. 17
Table 3.4 –Construction Noise Action and Limit Levels................................................................ 17
Table 3.5 – Event and Action Plan for Noise Quality.................................................................... 19
Table 4.1 - Water Quality Monitoring Programme........................................................................ 22
Table 4.2 - Monitoring Station Co-ordinates.................................................................................. 25
Table 4.3 - Equipment Used for Marine Water Quality
Monitoring............................................... 26
Table 4.4 - Water Sample Handling Requirements........................................................................ 26
Table 4.5 - Summary of Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)......................................................................... 28
Table 4.6 - Summary of Dissolved Oxygen (% Saturation)............................................................ 29
Table 4.7 - Summary of Turbidity (NTU)....................................................................................... 30
Table 4.8 - Summary of Suspended Solids (mg/L).......................................................................... 31
Table 4.9 - Summary of
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)........................................................................ 33
Table 4.10 - Summary of Dissolved Oxygen (% Saturation).......................................................... 34
Table 4.11 - Summary of Turbidity (NTU)..................................................................................... 35
Table 4.12 - Summary of Suspended Solids (mg/L)........................................................................ 36
Table 4.13 - EPD
Routine Monitoring Data Year 2002 - Dissolved Oxygen (mg/L)....................... 39
Table 4.14 - EPD
Routine Monitoring Data Year 2002 - Dissolved Oxygen (% Saturation).......... 40
Table 4.15 - EPD
Routine Monitoring Data Year 2002 – Turbidity (NTU).................................... 41
Table 4.16 - EPD
Routine Monitoring Data Year 2002 – Suspended Solids (mg/L)....................... 42
Table 4.17 – Summary of Year 2002 EPD Routine Monitoring Data............................................. 43
Table 4.18 - Comparison of Baseline Monitoring Results with
EPD Routine Monitoring Data...... 44
Table 4.19 - Action and Limit Level Criteria for Marine-Based
Stations......................................... 45
Table 4.20 - Calculated Action and Limit Levels at
Marine-Based Stations (Based on EPD Year
.................. 2002
and Baseline Monitoring Data)......................................................................... 46
Table 4.21 - Seawater Intake Water Quality Requirements............................................................ 47
Table 4.22 -Calculated Action and Limit Levels for Intake
Stations (Baseline Monitoring Results) . 48
Table 4.23 – Event and Action Plan for Water Quality.................................................................. 51
|
ACL |
Atkins China Limited |
|
|
Action and Limit |
|
CRIII |
Central Reclamation Phase III |
|
DEP |
Director of Environmental Protection |
|
DO |
Dissolved Oxygen |
|
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
|
EIAO |
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance |
|
EIAO TM |
Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process |
|
EM&A |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit |
|
EOT |
Extended Overrun Tunnel |
|
EPD |
Environmental Protection Department |
|
ER |
Engineer’s Representative |
|
ET |
Environmental Team |
|
FEP |
Further Environmental Permit |
|
GPS |
Global Positioning System |
|
HKAPA |
Hong Kong Academy of Performing Arts |
|
HKSAR |
Hong Kong Special Administrative Region |
|
HVS |
High Volume Sampler |
|
IEC |
Independent Environmental Checker |
|
LCSD |
Leisure and Cultural Services Department |
|
LCSVO-JV |
Leighton-China State-Van Oord Joint Venture |
|
Leq |
A-weighted equivalent sound pressure levels |
|
MTRC |
Mass Transit Railway Corporation |
|
PLA |
People’s Liberation Army |
|
SLM |
Sound Level Meter |
|
SS |
Suspended Solids |
|
TDD |
Territory Development Department |
|
TSP |
Total Suspended Particulate |
Executive Summary
This is the Baseline Monitoring Report prepared by Atkins China Limited (ACL) for the Central Reclamation Phase III (CRIII) project. In accordance with the EM&A Manual, baseline monitoring was conducted prior to commencement of construction works. This report presents the monitoring results of the baseline air quality, noise and water quality monitoring for CRIII.
The Baseline Monitoring Report has been prepared in compliance with the CRIII project’s Further Environmental Permit (FEP-01/122/2003), Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A) Manual and the Technical Memorandum on Environmental Impact Assessment Process, EIAO, Cap. 4899, S.16).
Baseline air quality monitoring was undertaken at two representative sensitive receiver locations, City Hall and the PLA Headquarters. The baseline monitoring of air quality included 1-hour and 24-hour TSP monitoring, which was undertaken in March 2003. The baseline TSP monitoring data was processed, reviewed and analysed to establish the Action and Limit Levels for 1-hour and 24-hour TSP Levels to be used during impact monitoring.
Baseline noise monitoring was undertaken at one representative sensitive receiver location, City Hall, in March and April 2003. The baseline monitoring included 24-hour noise monitoring, covering daytime, evening-time and night-time periods. Results from the monitoring work have been processed to establish baseline conditions and derive the proposed Action and Limit Levels to be used during the impact monitoring.
Baseline marine water quality, including dissolved oxygen, turbidity and suspended solids was undertaken at fourteen designated monitoring stations, comprising 6 marine based stations and 8 seawater intake stations. Baseline monitoring was undertaken for a period of eight weeks, during mid-ebb and mid-flood tide conditions, between February and April 2003. This data was processed, reviewed and analysed to establish the Action and Limit Levels for dissolved oxygen, turbidity and suspended solids during impact monitoring.
No major construction activities influencing air quality, noise or marine water quality were identified during the baseline monitoring.
· The reclamation of approximately 18 hectares of land in Central and the construction of seawalls, roads and associated services. Also included in the construction works is the North Island Line Protection Works and Advance Trunk Road Tunnel (ATRT) for the Central-Wan Chai Bypass.
· The reprovisioning of Star Ferry Pier, public landing steps, moorings, and motor boat/launch operators’ kiosks.
· Provisions for external cooling water systems which consist of the cooling water pumping shells for future developments, and the reprovisioning of existing cooling water pumping stations and associated pipework systems and E&M works.
· The reprovisioning of the existing Leisure and Cultural Services Department (LSCD)’s facilities.
· The provision of a flood relief path, stormwater culvert extensions, upgrading of hinterland stormwater drainage resulting from the reclamation, and demolition of the existing waterfront structures and necessary landscaping.
· Construction of the Hong Kong Station Extended Overrun Tunnel (EOT) and associated ventilation structures entrusted for construction within the CRIII engineering works.
·
Reprovisioning of the
Government Heliport at the Wan Chai PCWA and reprovisioning of the Wan Chai
PCWA at
·
Central
Reclamation Phase III - Reclamation works (including associated dredging works)
of about 18 ha in size;
·
Roads
P1, P2, D6, D7, D8, D9 and D11 - About
1.05 km of primary distributor and about 0.85km of district distributor roads;
·
Central
- Wan Chai Bypass Tunnel - About 0.95 km of tunnel; and
·
North
Island Line protection works - About 0.5 km of North Island Line protection
works.
(a) up to half a page executive summary;
(b) brief project background information;
(c) drawings showing locations of the baseline monitoring stations;
(d) monitoring results (in both hard and diskette copies) together with the following information:
· monitoring methodology;
· name of laboratory and types of equipment used and calibration details;
· parameters monitored;
· monitoring locations (and depth);
· monitoring date, time, frequency and duration; and
· QA/QC results and detection limits.
(e) details on influencing factors, including:
· major activities, if any, being carried out on the site during the period;
· weather conditions during the period; and
· other factors which might affect the results.
(f) determination of the Action and Limit Levels for each monitoring parameter and statistical analysis of the baseline data; the analysis shall conclude if there is any significant difference between control and impact stations for the parameters monitored;
(g) details of influcencing factors, including:
· the major activities being carried out on site during the period;
· weather conditions during the period; and
· other factors which may affect the results.
(h) determination of Action and Limit Levels for each monitoring parameter and statistical analysis;
(i) revisions for inclusion in the EM&A Manual; and
(j) comments and conclusions.
(a) Section 2 presents the baseline air quality monitoring results and proposed Action and Limit Levels;
(b) Section 3 presents the baseline noise quality monitoring results and proposed Action and Limit Levels;
(c) Section 4 presents the baseline water quality monitoring results and proposed Action and Limit Levels; and
(d) Section 5 provides the conclusions and recommendations.
|
Date of Sampling |
Parameter |
Period |
Frequency |
|
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
Suspended A |
¾ |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
Notes: A - Baseline monitoring
was partially suspended due to bad weather.
B - An additional 1-hour TSP
measurement was performed to make up for monitoring which was
suspended due to adverse weather
on
|
Date of Sampling |
Parameter |
Period |
Frequency |
|
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
Suspended B |
¾ |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
5 times/dayC |
|
24-hour TSP |
|
Once per
day |
|
|
|
1-hour TSP |
|
3 times/day |
Notes:
A – Baseline monitoring was partially suspended due to bad weather.
B – Baseline monitoring of 1-hour
TSP was suspended due to rain.
C –Two additional 1-hour TSP
measurements were performed to make up for monitoring which
Was suspended due to rain on
HVS Locations
· a horizontal platform with appropriate support to secure the samplers against gusty wind was provided;
· no two HVS were placed less than 2 m apart;
· the distance between the HVS and any obstacles, such as buildings, was at least twice the height that the obstacle protrudes above the HVS;
· a minimum of 2 m separation from walls, parapets and penthouses was required for rooftop samplers;
· a minimum of 2 m separation from any supporting structure, measured horizontally;
· no furnace or incinerator flues were nearby;
· airflow around the sampler was unrestricted;
· any wire fence and gate, to protect the sampler did not cause any obstruction during monitoring;
· permission was obtained to set up the samplers and to obtain access to the monitoring stations; and
· a secured supply of electricity was provided to operate the samplers.
Field Measurements
· The power supply was checked to ensure the HVS works properly;
· The filter holder and the area surrounding the filter were cleaned;
· The filter holder was removed by loosening the four bolts and a new filter on a supporting screen was aligned carefully;
· The filter was properly aligned on the screen so that the gasket formed an airtight seal on the outer edges of the filter;
· The swing bolts were fastened to hold the filter holder down to the frame. The pressure applied was sufficient to avoid air leakage at the edges;
· The shelter lid was closed and was secured with the aluminum strip;
· The HVS was warmed-up to establish run-temperature conditions;
· A new flowrate record sheet was set into the flow recorder;
· The programmable timer was set for a sampling period of 24 hrs + 1 hr, and the starting time, weather condition and the filter number were recorded;
· The initial elapsed time was recorded;
· At the end of sampling, the sampled filter was removed carefully and folded in half-length so that only surfaces with collected particulate matter were in contact;
· The sample was placed in a clean plastic envelope and sealed;
· All monitoring information was recorded on a standard data sheet; and
· The filters were taken back to laboratory for analysis.
|
Parameter Measured |
Equipment |
|
24-Hour Sampling |
A High
Volume Sampler Model GS2310, by Anderson Instruments, was used for both monitoring
stations. This
instrument was equipped with: ·
An
electronic mass flow controller with 20 – 60 SCFM adjustable flow range ·
A
digital timer for recording elapsed-time and 24-hour operation ·
A
continuous flow recorder for continuous monitoring |
|
1-Hour Sampling |
A
MicroDust pro Aerosol Monitoring
System was used for both monitoring locations. This
portable instrument is capable of providing: ·
Real
time TSP concentration ·
Adjustable
logging intervals from ·
Average
concentration over logging interval and maximum and average values for entire
logging period |
|
Station |
City Hall Average TSP |
PLA Site Average TSP |
|
1-Hour TSP |
324 |
280 |
|
24-Hour TSP |
51 |
37 |
|
Table 2.5 - Air Quality Action and Limit Levels for the City Hall Monitoring Station |
|
Action Level |
Limit Level |
|
|
1-Hour TSP
Level in mg/m3 |
461A |
500 |
|
24-Hour
TSP Level in mg/m3 |
163B |
260 |
Notes: A - For Baseline Level £ 384 mg/m3,
Action Level = (Baseline Level*1.3 + Limit Level)/2;
For Baseline Level > 384 mg/m3,
Action Level = Limit Level
B
- For Baseline Level £
200 mg/m3,
Action Level = (Baseline Level*1.3 + Limit Level)/2;
For Baseline Level > 200 mg/m3,
Action Level = Limit Level