Item	Document Title	Version	Date of Submission to ER
1	Advance Notification of Night-time Construction Work (Ref. H2189/C1/11276/AT/EY/ST/atm).	-	23 December 2004
2	Working Paper on Options, Evaluation and Recommendations of Temporary Storage of Precsst Caissons (Ref. H2189/C1/11208/AT/ET/ST/atm).	-	20 December 2004
3	Temporary Noise Barrier for DSD Entrustment Works at Lung Wui Road (Ref. H2189/C1/10941/MP/DC/CKA/ST/ cm)	-	3 December 2004

No	Certification Subject	Letter Ref.	Date of Submission to EPD	Approved Status
1	Certification of Monthly Environmental Report No. 16 - November 2004	3128/M45/200/OC6722/SB/ AC/al	13 December 2004	-

4. Monitoring Results

4.1 Impact Monitoring Schedule in December 2004

Regular site inspections were carried out to assess whether the project's environmental protection and pollution control measures are in compliance with the contract specifications. Inspections were conducted on 3, 16, 23 and 30 December 2004.

Air quality monitoring has not commenced yet as no significant work areas or construction activities with the potential to impact air quality are within range of the closest air quality sensitive receivers (ASR).

Continuous 24-hour noise monitoring was conducted during this reporting period.

Impact water quality monitoring at all monitoring stations was undertaken during this reporting month. The water quality monitoring schedule for December 2004 is presented in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 - Water Quality Monitoring Programme (Seawater Intakes Stations)

Date of Sampling	Tidal State	Timing of Sampling
1 December 2004	Mid Ebb	12:37 - 15:32
1 December 2004	Mid Flood	07:15 - 10:50
3 December 2004	Mid Ebb	06:48 - 10:42
3 December 2004	Mid Flood	14:00 - 17:00
6 December 2004	Mid Ebb	07:39 - 10:55
6 December 2004	Mid Flood	12:36 - 16:11
8 December 2004	Mid Ebb	08:22 - 12:18
8 December 2004	Mid Flood	13:39 - 17:10
10 December 2004	Mid Ebb	09:43 - 13:36
10 December 2004	Mid Flood	14:48 - 17:33
13 December 2004	Mid Ebb	12:30 - 15:00
13 December 2004	Mid Flood	07:44 - 10:36
15 December 2004	Mid Ebb	13:27 - 16:03
15 December 2004	Mid Flood	08:48 - 12:07
17 December 2004	Mid Ebb	15:17 - 17:50
17 December 2004	Mid Flood	10:20 - 13:17
20 December 2004	Mid Ebb	07:37 - 10:53
20 December 2004	Mid Flood	12:22 - 15:02
22 December 2004	Mid Ebb	08:15 - 10:48
22 December 2004	Mid Flood	13:21 - 16:10
24 December 2004	Mid Ebb	09:35 - 12:35
24 December 2004	Mid Flood	14:21 - 17:07
27 December 2004	Mid Ebb	10:52 - 13:44
27 December 2004	Mid Flood	15:22 - 18:11
29 December 2004	Mid Ebb	12:42 - 15:30
29 December 2004	Mid Flood	07:39 - 10:51
31December 2004	Mid Ebb	13:12 - 15:53
31December 2004	Mid Flood	09:09 - 11:58

4.2 Monitoring Methodology

4.2.1 Air Quality Monitoring

Air quality monitoring will be performed in accordance with the methodology described in the EM&A Manual once construction activities requiring air quality monitoring commence. The locations of the monitoring stations at City Hall and PLA Headquarters are shown in Annex C.

4.2.2 Noise Quality Monitoring

Continuous 24-hour noise monitoring was performed in accordance with the methodology described in the EM&A Manual in the reporting period. The location of the noise monitoring station at City Hall is shown in Annex C.

4.2.3 Water Quality Monitoring

Water quality monitoring was performed in accordance with the methodology described in the EM&A Manual. Monitoring for the reporting month was conducted at all stations, which comprises of 6 marine-based stations and 8 seawater intake stations. The locations of the monitoring stations are shown in Annex C.

4.3 Monitoring Equipment

4.3.1 Air Quality

The equipment that is used for air quality monitoring is listed in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 - Equipment for Air Quality Monitoring

Parameter Measured	Equipment
24-Hour Sampling	High Volume Sampler Model GS2310 by Anderson Instruments to be used for both monitoring stations.
1-Hour Sampling	MicroDust pro Aerosol Monitoring System to be used for both monitoring locations.

4.3.2 Noise Quality

The equipment used for continuous noise quality monitoring is listed in Table 4.3.

Table 4.3 - Noise Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Model
Integrated Sound Level Meter (SLM)	B&K 2238
Calibrator	B&K 4231, Class 1

4.3.3 Water Quality

The equipment that was used for water quality monitoring is listed in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4 - Equipment Used for Marine Water Quality Monitoring

Parameter Measured	Equipment
Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Measuring Equipment	A Dissolved Oxygen meter YSI model 58 was used. · This instrument was portable and weatherproof and used a DC power source. The equipment was capable of measuring: · DO levels in the range of 0-20 mg/l and 0-200% saturation; and · Temperature of between 0 - 45 degree Celsius. · The equipment had a membrane electrode with an automatic temperature compensation complete with a cable. In addition, a Wirling Psychrometer was used as a reference thermometer during the sampling.
Turbidity Measurement Instrument	A Turbidimeter, HACH model 2100P was used for determining turbidity levels. The instrument is portable and weatherproof and uses a DC power source. The instrument includes a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring turbidity between 0-1000 NTU.
PH	A MP125 pH Meter from Mettler Toledo was used to measure pH.
Salinity / Conductivity Meter	A Salinity / Conductivity meter YSI model 63 and model 30 was used for determining salinity concentrations.
Sample Containers and Storage	Water samples for SS analysis were stored in high density polythene bottles with no preservative added, packed in ice and delivered to the laboratory, and analysed as soon as possible after collection.

4.3.4 Equipment Calibration

The calibration frequencies of the monitoring equipment are provided in Table 4.5.

Table 4.5 - Equipment Calibration Frequencies

Equipment	Calibration Frequency	Latest Calibration Date
Dissolved Oxygen Meter	Every 6 months	26 October 2004
Turbidimeter	Every 3 months for secondary standards; meter is calibrated prior to each measurement to the secondary standards	26 October 2004
pH Meter	Prior to each sampling day	-
Pyschrometer	Every 6 months	5 October 2004
Integrated SLM	Every year	20 August 2004

4.4 Impact Monitoring Results

4.4.1 Air Quality & Noise Monitoring Results

No air quality monitoring work was undertaken during the reporting period as no significantly dusty construction activities with the potential to impact air quality are within range of the closest air quality sensitive receivers.

Noise quality monitoring work was undertaken during the reporting period. The noise monitoring results are provided in Annex F. Graphical representation of the noise monitoring data is provided in Annex G.

4.4.2 Water Quality Monitoring Results

Water quality monitoring was undertaken at all water quality monitoring locations during the reporting period. The water quality monitoring results from this reporting period are presented in Annex H. Graphical representation of the water quality data is provided in Annex I. Summaries of the results are provided in Tables 4.5 to 4.9.

Marine-Based Stations

Monitoring stations M8 and M10 were selected as the marine-based impact stations as they are located outside the predicted influence of the dredging and reclamation works. The detection of water quality degradation at these two stations may indicate that project marine works are adversely affecting water quality in Victoria Harbour. Stations M7 and M9 are within the expected influence of the reclamation activities and are located along the works area boundary (or extent of the predicted sediment plume). As such, M7 and M9 are used as indicator stations to note any significant elevations in SS, turbidity or reductions in DO that may affect the marine-based impact monitoring stations.

Table 4.5 is a summary of the marine-based stations monitoring results during mid-ebb tide.

Table 4.5 - Summary of Mid-Ebb Results for Marine-Based Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO (S&M) mg/L	DO (B) mg/L	DO % Sat. (DA)	Turbidity (DA) NTU	SS (DA) mg/L
C1	min	5.3	5.1	70.3	2.7	4
	max	6.1	6.1	80.7	8.0	7
	avg	5.7	5.6	76.1	4.3	6
	sd	0.3	0.3	3.8	1.6	1
C2	min	5.3	5.1	69.2	2.3	4
	max	6.1	6.2	81.0	6.0	7
	avg	5.8	5.6	76.3	4.2	6
	sd	0.3	0.4	3.3	1.3	1
M7	min	4.8	5.0	67.4	2.8	4
	max	6.0	6.0	79.8	6.6	6
	avg	5.4	5.5	72.6	3.9	5
	sd	0.3	0.4	3.4	1.3	1
M8	min	5.1	5.1	68.4	2.4	4
	max	6.3	6.3	82.7	6.4	7
	avg	5.8	5.7	76.9	4.4	6
	sd	0.4	0.4	4.6	1.2	1
M9	min	4.9	5.0	68.9	2.6	4
	max	5.9	6.2	79.5	7.3	8
	avg	5.5	5.5	73.8	4.2	6
	sd	0.3	0.4	3.7	1.4	1
M10	min	5.2	5.0	70.9	2.7	5
	max	6.2	6.1	81.9	7.2	7
	avg	5.7	5.6	75.6	4.1	6
	sd	0.3	0.3	3.2	1.3	1

As Table 4.5 shows, DO levels at marine-based impact stations (M8 & M10) in the surface to middle layer during mid-ebb survey ranged between 5.0 and 6.3 mg/L with an average value of 5.7 mg/L and DO measurements in the bottom layer ranged from 5.0 to 6.3 mg/L with an average level of 5.6 mg/L. Similar DO levels were recorded at the control stations at which DO levels in the surface to middle layer during mid-ebb survey ranged from 5.3 to 6.1 mg/L with an average value of around 5.8 mg/L; DO measurements in the bottom layer ranged between 5.1 and 6.2 mg/L with an average level of 5.6 mg/L.

SS levels during mid-ebb tide ranged from 4 to 7 mg/L with an average value of 6 mg/L at the marine-based impact stations (M8 & M10), which is comparable to results from the control stations in which SS content ranged from 4 to 7 mg/L with an average of 5 mg/L. Generally, the results showed no clear gradient effect (high SS and low DO levels from near-field stations M7 and M9 to far-field stations M8 and M10), which indicates that marine works are not adversely affecting marine water quality outside the work site boundary in Victoria Harbour. Marine water quality at impact monitoring stations was found to be similar to that at the control stations also indicating that project marine works were generally not adversely affecting water quality in Victoria Harbour.

Table 4.6 is a summary of monitoring results from marine-based stations during mid-flood tide.

Table 4.6 - Summary of Mid-Flood Results for Marine-Based Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO (S&M) mg/L	DO (B) mg/L	DO % Sat. (DA)	Turbidity (DA) NTU	SS (DA) mg/L
C1	min	5.2	5.1	70.0	2.6	4.6
	max	6.3	5.9	83.1	6.9	9.4
	avg	5.8	5.5	76.1	4.5	6.4
	sd	0.4	0.2	4.1	1.5	1.7
C2	min	5.2	4.9	67.8	2.0	4.2
	max	6.4	5.9	83.4	6.1	10.0
	avg	5.7	5.4	74.6	4.3	6.2
	sd	0.4	0.3	4.6	1.3	1.8
M7	min	4.6	4.8	62.5	3.1	4.1
	max	6.1	6.1	79.5	6.3	9.1
	avg	5.4	5.3	71.4	4.5	6.0
	sd	0.4	0.4	4.3	1.1	1.4
M8	min	5.0	5.0	68.0	2.0	4.0
	max	6.3	6.2	83.1	6.6	10.1
	avg	5.7	5.7	76.5	4.5	6.2
	sd	0.4	0.4	4.7	1.3	1.8
M9	min	4.9	4.8	67.3	2.8	4
	max	6.2	6.3	81.8	6.5	10
	avg	5.5	5.4	73.0	4.7	6
	sd	0.3	0.4	4.2	1.3	2
M10	min	5.2	5.0	69.0	2.4	4.4
	max	6.4	6.5	84.5	6.2	9.8
	avg	5.7	5.6	76.2	4.3	6.2
	sd	0.4	0.4	4.7	1.3	1.4

During mid-flood tide, DO levels at marine-based impact stations (M8 & M10) in the surface to middle layer ranged from 5.0 to 6.4 mg/L with an average level of 5.7 mg/L while DO values in the bottom layer ranged between 5.0 and 6.5 mg/L with an average of 5.6 mg/L. Similar DO concentrations were recorded at the control stations in the surface to middle layer during mid-flood survey ranged between 5.2 and 6.4 mg/L with an average value of 5.7 mg/L and DO results in the bottom layer ranged from 4.9 and 5.9 mg/L with an average of 5.5 mg/L.

SS content ranged between 4 and 10 mg/L (for stations M8 & M10) with an average of 6 mg/L during mid-flood tide and ranged from 4 to 10 mg/L with an average value of 6 mg/L at the control stations. Again, the results showed no clear gradient effect and no significant difference between control stations and marine-based impact stations. Therefore, the marine-based station results indicate that during the reporting month the dredging works were not adversely affecting water quality outside the work site boundary.

Seawater Intake Stations

Table 4.7 is a summary of monitoring results from seawater intake stations during mid-ebb tide.

Table 4.7 - Summary of Mid-Ebb Results for Seawater Intake Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO mg/L	DO % Sat.	Turbidity NTU	SS mg/L
M1	min	4.3	59.6	4.1	6.3
	max	5.9	79.9	7.5	11.3
	avg	5.3	71.0	5.9	7.8
	sd	0.5	6.6	1.0	1.5
M2	min	4.1	56.9	4.4	7.9
	max	5.9	80.1	9.8	15.9
	avg	4.9	66.3	6.9	10.8
	sd	0.5	7.1	1.5	2.4
M3	min	4.0	54.2	3.7	6.6
	max	6.1	81.3	8.0	12.2
	avg	4.9	66.4	5.8	8.9
	sd	0.7	8.6	1.2	1.8
M4	min	4.3	59.6	3.3	5.9
	max	5.8	77.1	8.1	11.6
	avg	5.1	68.5	5.2	7.8
	sd	0.4	5.0	1.3	1.7
M5	min	4.4	59.4	3.7	5.7
	max	5.9	80.1	9.9	10.4
	avg	5.1	68.7	5.4	7.5
	sd	0.5	6.1	1.8	1.6
M6	min	4.2	57.4	3.8	5.1
	max	5.9	79.4	9.3	11.1
	avg	5.0	66.9	5.3	7.6
	sd	0.5	6.6	1.4	1.9
M11	min	4.3	60	3.8	5
	max	5.8	79	7.3	11
	avg	5.1	68	5.4	7
	sd	0.4	6	1.2	2
M12	min	4.3	57.8	3.5	5.4
	max	5.8	78.5	8.6	10.6
	avg	5.0	66.7	5.3	7.3
	sd	0.4	5.2	1.4	1.4

Seawater intake results during mid-ebb tide, Table 4.7, show that DO levels ranged from 4.0 to 6.1 mg/L with an average of 5.0 mg/L. SS ranged between 5 and 16 mg/L with an average value of 8 mg/L. Low DO levels at the intake stations were recorded during the reporting month but investigations found that they were not due to project works. Elevated SS levels were found on 3, 6 and 17 December 2004. These levels were investigated and it was found that they were generally due to ambient conditions and/or influences not related to project works.

Table 4.8 is a summary of monitoring results from seawater intake stations during mid-flood tide.

Table 4.8 - Summary of Mid-Flood Results for Seawater Intake Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO mg/L	DO % Sat.	Turbidity NTU	SS mg/L
M1	min	4.4	59.4	4.4	6.4
	max	6.2	83.3	10.1	13.8
	avg	5.3	70.9	6.7	8.9
	sd	0.6	7.7	1.7	1.9
M2	min	4.1	55.4	5.6	7.8
	max	5.9	80.4	11.1	18.7
	avg	4.9	66.2	7.3	11.6
	sd	0.6	7.5	1.5	3.0
M3	min	3.9	53.3	4.5	6.4
	max	6.1	81.9	7.8	11.4
	avg	5.0	66.8	5.8	9.1
	sd	0.6	8.1	0.9	1.6
M4	min	4.2	57.2	4.3	5.9
	max	5.9	79.7	8.6	11.7
	avg	5.1	69.1	5.7	8.4
	sd	0.5	7.0	1.0	1.6
M5	min	4.2	57	4.3	6
	max	5.8	80	8.6	12
	avg	5.0	69	5.7	9
	sd	0.5	7	1.0	1
M6	min	4.2	56	3.5	5
	max	5.9	80	8.3	11
	avg	5.0	68	5.1	7
	sd	0.6	7	1.2	2
M11	min	4.5	56	3.4	5
	max	5.9	79	7.8	10
	avg	5.1	67	5.4	8
	sd	0.5	7	1.4	2
M12	min	4.2	61	4.5	6
	max	5.7	80	9.4	14
	avg	5.0	69	6.8	9
	sd	0.4	7	1.4	2

During mid-flood survey, Table 4.8 shows that DO levels at seawater intake stations ranged from 3.9 to 6.2 mg/L with an average of 5.0 mg/L. SS ranged from 5 to 19 mg/L with an average SS content of 9 mg/L. The above results show that water quality during mid-flood tide was also generally good. Again, low DO levels were found but these were found to be not due to project works. The elevated SS levels found on 1, 3 and 22 December 2004 were investigated and were found that to be due to ambient conditions and/or influences not related to project works. However, the exceedance recorded on 17 December may have been attributed to sand filling works at IRAW. Subsequent monitoring and inspections found no further impacts from the sand filling works.

4.4.3 Waste Management

No waste management audit was scheduled within this reporting period. The arrangement of waste management audit is detailed in the Waste Management Plan.

4.4.4 Landscape and Visual

As the major construction activities undertaken during the reporting month were related to marine works, the landscape and visual impacts are considered to be minimal.

5. Environmental Complaint and Non-Compliance

5.1 Environmental Exceedances

The total number of exceedances for air, noise and water quality are presented in following sections.

5.1.1 Air Quality

No air quality monitoring work was undertaken during the reporting period.

5.1.2 Noise Quality

It should be noted that noise measurements are not available for the period between 3 December and 23 December 2004 as the external power source for the noise meter was disrupted due to the electrical and mechanical work carried out at City Hall.

Noise quality exceedances were recorded on 24, 26 and 31 December 2004. However, investigations into these exceedances found that they were not due to the project works. The noise levels were attributable to passer-by activities at the drop-off area in front of City Hall. There are no project works located in the vicinity of City Hall. It is also noted that external contractors are still undertaking exterior renovation works at City Hall.

5.1.3 Water Quality

Water quality was found to be generally good during the reporting month. The recorded exceedances of the water quality criteria were generally found not to be caused by the project works. Visual observations of the harbour during the reporting month noted the presence of floating debris in Victoria Harbour.

The DO levels below the Action and Limit Levels observed at the seawater intakes were investigated and were found to be attributed to natural variation or changes in ambient conditions. The exceedances were found not to be caused by the project marine works. Further, the results generally do not show any significant gradient effect between stations close to the marine works and stations more remote to the works area.

Elevated concentrations of SS were recorded on 1, 3, 6, 17 and 22 December 2004. These exceedances were investigated and all but one were found to be attributable to poor ambient conditions and/or influences not related to project works. The investigations generally found no significant gradient effects between those stations close to the project works and those more remote to the works area. However, the exceedances recorded on 17 December 2004 may have been attributed to sand filling works at IRAW. All parties were immediately informed of the exceedances and a subsequent site inspection noted that appropriate mitigation measures such as a silt curtain enclosing the works area were implemented. No further water quality impacts from sand filling works at IRAW were observed.

Silty discharges were observed at Outfall I, located adjacent to HSBC's seawater intake, on 15 and 16 December 2004. Investigations into these exceedances found that the discharges are not project related, as no muddy works are located in the area. Information regarding the discharges has been provided to EPD for their record and necessary actions.

5.1.4 Waste Management

No non-compliances with regard to waste management were recorded in the reporting month.

5.1.5 Landscape and Visual

No non-compliance with regard to landscape and visual aspects were recorded in the reporting month.

5.1.6 Site Environmental Audit

No environmental non-compliances were found during environmental site inspections conducted during the reporting period.

A summary of the findings from the site inspections conducted during the reporting month is provided in Table 5.1.

Table 5.1 - Summary of Environmental Site Inspections

Date of Inspection	Observations	Action(s)
3 December 2004	The chemical waste absorption pack was found missing at the chemical waste storage location at CR-4.	The Contractor advised that the absorption pack is located at CR-13 and will return it to the chemical waste storage area
3 December 2004	Dark smoke was found emitting from one large excavator at CR-12.	The Contractor agreed to undertake necessary maintenance or repairs for the equipment.
9 December 2004
16 December 2004	A leaky hose connection from the sedimentation tank at CR-4 was observed	The Contractor was asked to make the necessary repairs.
	A small amount of fugitive dust was observed at the cement mixing area at CR-4	The Contractor was asked to improve the dust covering at the mixing area.
	Floating debris was found along the seawall near IRAW	The Contractor was asked to clear the floating debris.
	Silty discharges were observed at Outfall I, which is located adjacent to the HSBC seawater intake. Resident site staff observed similar discharges on 15 December 2004. An investigation into the incident found that the discharges are not project related, as no muddy works are located in the area.	No actions are required as discharges are not project related.
23 December 2004	Two used batteries were found discarded beside a generator at CR-12.	The Contractor was asked to transfer the used batteries to the chemical waste storage area.
	It is noted that the dust screens at the cement mixing area at CR-4 have been improved since the last site inspection.	No further actions required.
	Damaged sand bags were found placed around a drainage catch basin at CR-10.	The Contractor was asked to replace the damaged sand bags.
30 December 2004	Soil stockpiles at CR-12 were found to be uncovered.	The Contractor was reminded that soil stockpiles should be covered with impervious sheeting when they are not in use.
	Oil stained soil was found underneath one power generator at CR-4	The Contractor is reminded to properly maintain all plant and equipment and to use care during the transferring of lubricating oil.
	The damaged sand bags previously found at CR-10 have been replaced.	No further actions required.
	The discarded batteries previously found at CR-12 have been properly transferred to the chemical waste storage area.	No further actions required.

No significant sediment plumes were observed near the marine works during the site inspections.

5.2 Environmental Complaint and Prosecution

No environmental complaints and no prosecution notices or summons were received during the reporting month.

5.3 Environmental Enquiries

No environmental enquiries were received during the reporting month.

Client	Civil Engineering and Development Department Hong Kong Island and Islands Development Office
Project	Supplementary Agreement No. 3 to Agreement No. CE 15/94 Central Reclamation, Phase III Design and Construction for the Minimum Option
Report No.	3128-REP-195-00	Copy No.
Date of Issue	10 January 2004	File Ref. L:\S-proj\CR3\CR3.NEW\3128\ Reports\0195.doc
Report Title	Central Reclamation, Phase III Environmental Monitoring & Audit Monthly Report No. 17 - December 2004
	Name			Sign	Date
Prepared by :	Albert Chan, ACL - Environmental Consultant				10 Jan. 2005
Reviewed by :	Susana Bezy, ACL – ET Leader				10 Jan. 2005
Authorised by :	Jon Varndell, ACL – Project Mgr				10 Jan. 2005

Distribution
Copy No	Issue to		Attention		Corr. Ref.
1	CEDD		Mr H H Yeung		3128/M45/200/OC6815/al
2, 3	EPD		Mr M W Ho		3128/M45/200/OC6815/al
4	EPD (LCO)		Mr Allan Hung		3128/M45/200/OC6815/al
5	Leighton-China State-Van Oord JV		Mr Malcolm Plummer		3128/M45/200/OC6815/al
6	CRIII Sites/PRE		Mr Douglas Miller		3128/M45/200/OC6815/al
7	Independent Checker (Environment)		Mr Bill Douglas		3128/M45/200/OC6815/al
8	Environmental Team Leader		Ms Susana Bezy		3128/M45/200/OC6815/al
9	Office Copy

ACL	Atkins China Limited
CEDD	Civil Engineering and Development Department
CRIII	Central Reclamation Phase III
EIA	Environmental Impact Assessment
EIAO	Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance
EM&A	Environmental Monitoring and Audit
EPD	Environmental Protection Department
ER	Engineer’s Representatives
ET	Environmental Team
IEC	Independent Environmental Checker
LCSD	Leisure and Cultural Services Department
LCSVO-JV	Leighton China State Van Oord Joint Venture
TDD	Territory Development Department
TSP	Total Suspended Particulates
WMP	Waste Management Plan

Item	Item Description	Date of Application	Permit Status
1	Application for Renewal of Construction Noise Permit (GW-RS0571-04) for the use of Powered Mechanical Equipment for the purpose of carrying out Construction Work other than percussive piling (Ref. H2189/U2c/11248/ AT/DC/CKA/ST/ec).	21 December 2004	-
2	Application for Construction Noise Permit for Cooling Water Pipeline Connection Works near General Post Office (Ref. H2189/U2c/11246/AT/DC/KTY/ST/ec).	21 December 2004	-
3	Application for Construction Noise Permit for Unloading, Transporting and Storage of Pre-cast Caissons Units (Package 2 & 4, Repositioning C25 & C26) and Erection of Two Tower Cranes in Victoria Harbour during Night-time (Ref. H2189/U2c/11239/AT/EY/ST/ec)	20 December 2004	-
4	Test Report for Treated Effluent for Wastewater Discharge Licence No. EP880/W10/XX0195 9Ref. H2189/U2c/11021/ MP/DC/ST/ec)	8 December 2004	-
5	Application for Renewal of Construction Noise Permit GW-RS0457-04	2 December 2004	-

Parameters	Descriptions	Locations		Frequencies		Duration
TSP	24-Hour TSP	2 Locations		Once every 6 days		During dust generating construction works
	1-Hour TSP	2 Locations		Three times in every 6 days		During dust generating construction works
Noise	Leq (30 mins), L₁₀, L_90,	1 Location		Continuous measurements		Two weeks before Construction and During Construction
Water Quality	Dissolved Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended Solids; Turbidity.	14 Locations		3 times a week, Mid-ebb/flood tides		During Marine Works
Waste	On-Site Waste Audit	Active Work Sites		Periodically		During Construction
	On-Site Waste Inspection
Landscape and Visual	Audits to ensure effective implementation of mitigation measures					During Construction
General Site Conditions	Environmental Site Inspection		Works areas and areas affected by works		Periodically	During Construction

Date of Sampling	Sampling Time
3 January 2005	12:00	17:00
5 January 2005	08:30	13:29
7 January 2005	09:30	14:45
10 January 2005	12:00	17:00
12 January 2005	08:45	13:57
14 January 2005	10:08	15:34
17 January 2005	12:00	17:00
19 January 2005	08:30	13:30
21 January 2005	10:26	17:30
24 January 2005	11:52	16:41
26 January 2005	08:30	13:30
28 January 2005	08:49	14:05
31 January 2005	10:19	16:09
2 February 2005	11:28	17:00
4 February 2005	08:30	13:30
7 February 2005	11:27	16:13
14 February 2005	10:16	16:31
16 February 2005	11:31	18:57
18 February 2005	09:08	17:30
21 February 2005	11:14	15:53
23 February 2005	12:00	17:00
25 February 2005	08:30	13:30
28 February 2005	08:52	14:53

1. INTRODUCTION

2. Environmental Status

2.3 Environmental Document Submission

3. EM&A Requirements

3.1 Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements

3.2 Environmental Quality Performance Limits

3.3 Event Action Plan

3.4 Implementation of Environmental Measures