Item	Document Title	Version	Date of Submission to ER
1	Submission of Operational Monitoring Data for Alternate Dredging at IRAW & IRAE	-	29 January 2004
2	Photographs of Silty Discharge from Stormwater Drains (12 - 17 January 2004)	-	17 January 2004
3	Submission of Operational Monitoring Data for Alternate Dredging at IRAW & IRAE	-	15 January 2004
4	Variation of FEP Condition 3.2(B) - Maximum Dredging Volume	-	13 January 2004
5	Photographs of Silty Discharge from Stormwater Drains (5 & 10 January 2004)	-	10 January 2004
6	Submission of Operational Monitoring Data for Alternate Dredging at IRAW & IRAE	-	9 January 2004
7	Submission of Operational Monitoring Data for Alternate Dredging at IRAW & IRAE	-	2 January 2004
8	Photographs of Silty Discharge from Stormwater Drains (29, 29, 31 December 2003 and 2 January 2004)	-	2 January 2004

No	Certification Subject	Letter Ref.	Date of Submission to EPD	Approved Status
1	Certification of Monthly Environmental Report No. 5 - December 2003	3128/M45/200/OC5618/AC/al	8 January 2004	-

4. Monitoring Results

4.1 Impact Monitoring Schedule in January 2004

Regular site inspections were carried out to assess whether the project's environmental protection and pollution control measures are in compliance with the contract specifications. Inspections were conducted on 8, 14, 21 and 30 January 2004.

Air quality monitoring has not commenced yet as no work areas or construction activities with the potential to impact air quality are within range of the closest air quality sensitive receivers.

Continuous 24-hour noise monitoring was conducted during this reporting period.

Impact water quality monitoring at all monitoring stations was undertaken during this reporting month. The water quality monitoring schedule for January 2004 is presented in Table 4-1.

Table 4.1 - Water Quality Monitoring Programme (Seawater Intakes Stations)

Date of Sampling	Tidal State	Timing of Sampling
2 January 2004	Mid Ebb	07:41 - 10:30
2 January 2004	Mid Flood	13:00 - 15:30
5 January 2004	Mid Ebb	08:59 - 12:05
5 January 2004	Mid Flood	14:11 - 17:15
7 January 2004	Mid Ebb	10:26 - 13:16
7 January 2004	Mid Flood	15:13 - 18.05
9 January 2004	Mid Ebb	12:24 - 15:22
9 January 2004	Mid Flood	07:39 - 10:48
12 January 2004	Mid Ebb	14:21 - 17:10
12 January 2004	Mid Flood	15:52 - 18:33
14 January 2004	Mid Ebb	16:23 - 18:33
14 January 2004	Mid Flood	10:14 - 12:50
16 January 2004	Mid Ebb	06:40 - 10:05
16 January 2004	Mid Flood	12:12 - 14:38
19 January 2004	Mid Ebb	08:33 - 11:12
19 January 2004	Mid Flood	14:00 - 16:23
21 January 2004	Mid Ebb	10:53 - 13:24
21 January 2004	Mid Flood	05:45 - 08:35
26 January 2004	Mid Ebb	14:14 - 17:03
26 January 2004	Mid Flood	09:12 - 12:27
28 January 2004	Mid Ebb	15:25 - 18:07
28 January 2004	Mid Flood	10:32 - 13:30
30 January 2004	Mid Ebb	15:44 - 18:32
30 January 2004	Mid Flood	10:56 - 13:59

Note: No dredging was conducted during the public holiday between 22 and 26 January 2004. As such, no monitoring was conducted on 23 January 2004.

4.2 Monitoring Methodology

4.2.1 Air Quality Monitoring

Air quality monitoring will be performed in accordance with the methodology described in the EM&A Manual once construction activities requiring air quality monitoring commence. The locations of the monitoring stations at City Hall and PLA Headquarters are shown in Annex C.

4.2.2 Noise Quality Monitoring

Continuous 24-hour noise monitoring was performed in accordance with the methodology described in the EM&A Manual in the reporting period. The location of the noise monitoring station at City Hall is shown in Annex C.

4.2.3 Water Quality Monitoring

Water quality monitoring was performed in accordance with the methodology described in the EM&A Manual. Monitoring for the reporting month was conducted at all stations, which comprises of 6 marine-based stations and 8 seawater intake stations. The locations of the monitoring stations are shown in Annex C.

4.3 Monitoring Equipment

4.3.1 Air Quality

The equipment that is used for air quality monitoring is listed in Table 4-2.

Table 4.2 - Equipment for Air Quality Monitoring

Parameter Measured	Equipment
24-Hour Sampling	High Volume Sampler Model GS2310 by Anderson Instruments to be used for both monitoring stations.
1-Hour Sampling	MicroDust pro Aerosol Monitoring System to be used for both monitoring locations.

4.3.2 Noise Quality

The equipment used for continuous noise quality monitoring is listed in Table 4-3.

Table 4.3 - Noise Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Model
Integrated Sound Level Meter	B&K 2238
Calibrator	B&K 4231, Class 1

4.3.3 Water Quality

The equipment that was used for water quality monitoring is listed in Table 4-4.

Table 4.4 - Equipment Used for Marine Water Quality Monitoring

Parameter Measured	Equipment
Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Measuring Equipment	A Dissolved Oxygen meter YSI model 58 was used. · This instrument was portable and weatherproof and used a DC power source. The equipment was capable of measuring: · DO levels in the range of 0-20 mg/l and 0-200% saturation; and · Temperature of between 0 - 45 degree Celsius. · The equipment had a membrane electrode with an automatic temperature compensation complete with a cable. In addition, a Wirling Psychrometer was used as a reference thermometer during the sampling.
Turbidity Measurement Instrument	A Turbidimeter, HACH model 2100P was used for determining turbidity levels. The instrument is portable and weatherproof and uses a DC power source. The instrument includes a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring turbidity between 0-1000 NTU.
PH	A MP125 pH Meter from Mettler Toledo was used to measure pH.
Salinity / Conductivity Meter	A Salinity / Conductivity meter YSI model 63 and model 30 was used for determining salinity concentrations.
Sample Containers and Storage	Water samples for SS analysis were stored in high density polythene bottles with no preservative added, packed in ice and delivered to the laboratory, and analysed as soon as possible after collection.

4.4 Impact Monitoring Results

4.4.1 Air Quality & Noise Monitoring Results

No air quality monitoring work was undertaken during the reporting period as no work areas or construction activities with the potential to impact air quality are within range of the closest air quality sensitive receivers.

Noise quality monitoring work was undertaken during the reporting period. The noise monitoring results are provided in Annex F. Graphical representation of the noise monitoring data is provided in Annex G.

4.4.2 Water Quality Monitoring Results

Water quality monitoring was undertaken at all water quality monitoring locations during the reporting period. The water quality monitoring results from this reporting period are presented in Annex H. Graphical representation of the water quality data is provided in Annex I. Summaries of the results are provided in Tables 4.5 to 4.9.

Marine-Based Stations

Monitoring stations M8 and M10 were selected as the marine-based impact stations as they are located outside the predicted influence of the dredging and reclamation works. The detection of water quality degradation at these two stations may indicate that project marine works are adversely affecting water quality in Victoria Harbour. Stations M7 and M9 are within the expected influence of the reclamation activities and are located along the works area boundary (or extent of the predicted sediment plume). As such, M7 and M9 are used as indicator stations to note any significant elevations in SS, turbidity or reductions in DO that may affect the marine-based impact monitoring stations.

Table 4.5 is a summary of the marine-based stations monitoring results during mid-ebb tide.

Table 4.5 - Summary of Mid-Ebb Results for Marine-Based Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO (S&M) mg/L	DO (B) mg/L	DO % Sat. (DA)	Turbidity (DA) NTU	SS (DA) mg/L
C1	min	6.0	5.7	73.7	2.4	4
	max	8.0	8.0	104.3	5.1	7
	avg	7.1	7.0	89.6	3.7	5
	sd	0.6	0.7	9.3	0.7	1
C2	min	5.7	6.1	77.0	2.8	3
	max	7.8	7.7	101.5	4.8	5
	avg	7.1	6.8	88.5	3.5	4
	sd	0.6	0.5	8.5	0.6	1
M7	min	5.7	5.5	71.2	2.6	4
	max	7.3	7.4	95.7	8.9	11
	avg	6.4	6.4	81.4	4.2	5
	sd	0.5	0.6	8.4	1.7	2
M8	min	5.4	5.5	71.2	2.5	3
	max	7.6	7.7	99.0	4.7	6
	avg	6.8	6.8	86.3	3.7	4
	sd	0.7	0.6	9.3	0.7	1
M9	min	5.6	5.3	71.6	2.6	4
	max	7.3	7.5	94.9	4.7	6
	avg	6.6	6.7	83.8	3.7	5
	sd	0.6	0.7	8.9	0.7	1
M10	min	5.9	5.7	75.2	2.7	4
	max	7.2	7.2	93.9	5.2	6
	avg	6.7	6.6	84.2	3.7	5
	sd	0.5	0.5	7.4	0.7	1

As Table 4.5 shows, DO levels at marine-based impact stations (M8 & M10) in the surface to middle layer during mid-ebb survey ranged between 5.4 and 7.6 mg/L with an average value of 6.8 mg/L and DO measurements in the bottom layer ranged from 5.3 to 7.7 mg/L with an average level of 6.7 mg/L. Similar DO levels were recorded at the control stations at which DO levels in the surface to middle layer during mid-ebb survey ranged from 5.7 to 8.0 mg/L with an average value of around 7.1 mg/L; DO measurements in the bottom layer ranged between 5.7 and 8.0 mg/L with an average level of 6.9 mg/L.

SS levels during mid-ebb tide ranged from 3 to 6 mg/L with an average value of 5 mg/L at the marine-based impact stations (M8 & M10), which is comparable to results from the control stations in which SS content ranged from 3 to 7 mg/L with an average of 5 mg/L. The results showed no clear gradient effect (high SS and low DO levels from near-field stations M7 and M9 to far-field stations M8 and M10), which indicates that dredging works are not adversely affecting marine water quality outside the work site boundary in Victoria Harbour. Marine water quality at impact monitoring stations was found to be similar to that at the control stations also indicating that project marine works were not adversely affecting water quality in Victoria Harbour.

Table 4.6 is a summary of monitoring results from marine-based stations during mid-flood tide.

Table 4.6 - Summary of Mid-Flood Results for Marine-Based Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO (S&M) mg/L	DO (B) mg/L	DO % Sat. (DA)	Turbidity (DA) NTU	SS (DA) mg/L
C1	min	5.6	5.6	69.3	2.2	4
	max	8.1	8.1	105.4	6.2	8
	avg	6.9	6.8	87.2	3.9	5
	sd	0.7	0.8	10.2	1.2	1
C2	min	6.0	5.9	74.6	2.5	3
	max	7.9	7.8	103.3	5.4	7
	avg	6.9	6.8	87.8	3.6	5
	sd	0.6	0.7	9.1	0.8	1
M7	min	5.4	5.2	70.1	2.6	4
	max	6.9	7.4	92.8	5.4	7
	avg	6.3	6.2	79.9	4.1	5
	sd	0.5	0.6	7.3	1.0	1
M8	min	5.4	5.5	71.2	2.5	3
	max	7.6	7.7	99.0	4.7	6
	avg	6.8	6.8	86.3	3.7	4
	sd	0.7	0.6	9.3	0.7	1
M9	min	5.7	5.6	72.3	2.8	4
	max	7.1	7.3	92.0	5.5	7
	avg	6.3	6.3	80.7	4.0	5
	sd	0.4	0.5	7.0	0.9	1
M10	min	5.9	5.8	74.4	3.1	4
	max	7.4	7.1	96.0	7.7	11
	avg	6.6	6.4	83.3	4.1	6
	sd	0.5	0.5	7.5	1.2	2

During mid-flood tide, DO levels at marine-based impact stations (M8 & M10) in the surface to middle layer ranged from 5.4 to 7.6 mg/L with an average level of 6.7 mg/L while DO values in the bottom layer ranged between 5.5 and 7.7 mg/L with an average of 6.6 mg/L. Similar DO concentrations were recorded at the control stations in the surface to middle layer during mid-flood survey ranged between 5.6 and 8.1 mg/L with an average value of 6.9 mg/L and DO results in the bottom layer ranged from 5.6 and 8.1 mg/L with an average of 6.8 mg/L.

SS content ranged between 3 and 6 mg/L (for stations M8 & M10) with an average of 5 mg/L during mid-flood tide and ranged from 3 to 11 mg/L with an average value of 5 mg/L at the control stations. Again, the results showed no clear gradient effect and no significant difference between control stations and marine-based impact stations. Therefore, the marine-based station results indicate that during the month of December the dredging works were not adversely affecting water quality outside the work site boundary.

Seawater Intake Stations

Table 4.7 is a summary of monitoring results from seawater intake stations during mid-ebb tide.

Table 4.7 - Summary of Mid-Ebb Results for Seawater Intake Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO mg/L	DO % Sat.	Turbidity NTU	SS mg/L
M1	min	5.2	67.4	3.8	5
	max	6.7	86.4	7.3	9
	avg	5.9	75.4	5.3	7
	sd	0.4	5.4	1.0	1
M2	min	5.1	67.0	3.5	6
	max	6.2	79.5	6.5	11
	avg	5.8	74.1	5.0	8
	sd	0.3	4.3	0.9	2
M3	min	5.3	66.1	3.3	6
	max	6.5	83.2	9.4	20
	avg	5.8	74.6	5.2	9
	sd	0.4	5.5	1.6	4
M4	min	5.3	68.6	2.6	4
	max	6.5	84.9	8.4	14
	avg	5.9	75.4	4.6	7
	sd	0.4	5.3	1.5	2
M5	min	5.3	64.9	2.9	5
	max	6.5	84.7	6.6	9
	avg	5.8	74.6	4.1	6
	sd	0.4	5.2	1.2	1
M6	min	4.9	60.9	2.5	4
	max	6.3	80.7	5.8	7
	avg	5.6	71.4	3.9	6
	sd	0.5	6.6	1.0	1
M11	min	5.1	65.9	2.9	4
	max	6.6	84.5	5.2	7
	avg	5.9	75.2	3.7	5
	sd	0.4	5.4	0.7	1
M12	min	5.3	64.8	2.9	4
	max	6.2	80.9	7.7	8
	avg	5.7	73.3	4.4	6
	sd	0.3	5.5	1.6	1

Seawater intake results during mid-ebb tide, Table 4.7, show that DO levels ranged from 4.9 to 6.7 mg/L with an average of 5.8 mg/L. SS ranged between 4 and 20 mg/L with an average value of 6.8 mg/L. The monitoring results show that water quality at seawater intake stations was generally good. Only a few elevated SS levels, such as at station M3, were found during the reporting month. The poor water quality at M3 is also due to adverse impacts from outfalls located adjacent to the station. During the reporting month large quantities of silty discharges from outfalls were observed and documented near station M5 on various occasions. Observations noted that the large patches of brown silty water generally dispersed westwards after discharge from the outfall. A figure showing the location of various outfalls along the seawall within the project area is shown in Annex C.

Table 4.8 is a summary of monitoring results from seawater intake stations during mid-flood tide.

Table 4.8 - Summary of Mid-Flood Results for Seawater Intake Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO mg/L	DO % Sat.	Turbidity NTU	SS mg/L
M1	min	5.5	72.4	3.4	5
	max	6.6	86.3	8.4	8
	avg	6.0	77.8	5.2	7
	sd	0.3	4.1	1.3	1
M2	min	5.3	68.6	3.5	3
	max	6.2	81.2	6.1	10
	avg	5.8	73.9	4.9	7
	sd	0.3	4.0	0.8	2
M3	min	5.4	66.9	3.3	4
	max	6.4	83.6	6.8	13
	avg	5.9	75.0	4.9	8
	sd	0.3	4.2	1.0	2
M4	min	5.3	66.0	2.6	4
	max	6.5	84.6	6.9	9
	avg	5.9	75.4	4.2	6
	sd	0.3	5.1	1.3	2
M5	min	5.5	69.1	2.3	4
	max	6.6	86.2	5.7	10
	avg	5.9	76.0	4.0	5
	sd	0.3	4.9	1.0	2
M6	min	4.6	59.6	2.8	4
	max	6.1	79.7	5.6	10
	avg	5.5	70.0	4.2	6
	sd	0.5	6.5	0.9	2
M11	min	5.5	69.2	2.7	4
	max	6.7	86.7	17.4	25
	avg	6.1	77.3	5.3	7
	sd	0.4	5.6	3.9	6
M12	min	4.9	60.2	2.9	3
	max	6.4	83.5	6.8	9
	avg	5.7	72.7	4.1	6
	sd	0.4	6.6	1.1	1

During mid-flood survey, Table 4.8 shows that DO levels at seawater intake stations ranged from 4.6 to 6.7 mg/L with an average of 5.9 mg/L. SS ranged from 3 to 25 mg/L with an average SS content of 7 mg/L. The above results show that water quality during mid-flood tide was also generally good. Again, a few localised high SS levels were found but these were found to be not due to project works. The few instances of poor water quality at several seawater intake stations were due to adverse impacts from outfalls located adjacent to the stations. The instance of high SS at station M11 was caused by seawater intake maintenance work carried out by the intake operator and not due to project works. As mentioned previously, large quantities of silty discharges from outfalls near station M5 have been observed and documented on various occasions during the reporting month. A figure showing the location of various outfalls along the seawall within the project area is shown in Annex C.

4.4.3 Waste Management

No waste management audit was scheduled within this reporting period. The arrangement of waste management audit is detailed in the Waste Management Plan.

4.4.4 Landscape and Visual

As the works undertaken during the reporting month were related to site investigation works, demolition works and dredging works, the landscape and visual impacts are considered to be minimal.

6. Forecast and Schedule

6.1 Key Issues for the Coming Month

The key issues to be considered in the coming month include the following:

· The Contractor will continue to undertake alternate dredging at IRAW and IRAE. The operational and EM&A water quality monitoring programmes will continue to monitor the alternate dredging works to check for any additional impacts to water quality;

· Maintenance and necessary repairs to the seawater intake silt screens will continue.

6.2 Monitoring Schedules for the Next 3 Months

The construction works scheduled in January 2004 include dredging at IRAE and IRAW, demolition of the GPO walkway, marine site investigation and site investigation works. Based on the Contractor’s programme, the Environmental Monitoring Programme for the next three months is planned as follows:

TSP (24 hr and 1 hr monitoring)

Upon commencement of dust generating activities within range of the closest air quality sensitive receiver, dependent upon the Contractor’s programme.

Noise (Continuous Measurements)

The noise monitoring programme throughout the entire construction period is 24-hour continuous.

Water Quality Monitoring

The water quality monitoring schedule for the next 3 months is provided in the following table.

Table 6.1 - Water Quality Monitoring Programme

Date of Sampling	Sampling Time
2 February 2004	10:18	17:00
4 February 2004	11:00	16:30
6 February 2004	12:00	17:30
9 February 2004	08:48	14:21
11 February 2004	09:52	15:48
13 February 2004	11:05	17:00
16 February 2004	09:15	17:00
18 February 2004	11:00	16:30
20 February 2004	12:00	17:30
23 February 2004	08:43	14:32
25 February 2004	09:30	15:40
27 February 2004	10:14	17:00
1 March 2004	08:47	17:00
3 March 2004	10:24	17:00
5 March 2004	11:30	17:00
8 March 2004	08:30	14:00
10 March 2004	08:33	14:38
12 March 2004	09:33	16:06
15 March 2004	08:30	17:00
17 March 2004	10:00	15:30
19 March 2004	11:49	17:00
22 March 2004	08:30	14:00
24 March 2004	08:30	14:27
26 March 2004	08:33	15:22
29 March 2004	08:30	17:00
31 March 2004	08:53	17:00
2 April 2004	10:53	15:54
5 April 2004	12:21	17:00
7 April 2004	08:30	14:00
9 April 2004	08:30	15:00
12 April 2004	08:30	17:00
14 April 2004	09:00	14:30
16 April 2004	10:49	16:14
19 April 2004	12:00	17:30
21 April 2004	12:00	17:30
23 April 2004	08:30	14:00
26 April 2004	08:30	16:22
28 April 2004	08:30	17:00
30 April 2004	09:00	14:30

6.3 Construction Programme for the Next 3 Months

The construction programme for the next 3 months is provided in Annex B and will be updated by the Contractor.

The ET will follow the Contractor’s proposed programme to ensure the compliance of environmental performance and proper implementation of all necessary mitigation measures.

Client	Territory Development Department, Hong Kong Hong Kong Island and Islands Development Office
Project	Supplementary Agreement No. 3 to Agreement No. CE 15/94 Central Reclamation, Phase III Design and Construction for the Minimum Option
Report No.	3128-REP-162-00	Copy No.
Date of Issue	10 February 2004	File Ref. L:\S-proj\CR3\CR3.NEW\3128\ Reports\0162.doc
Report Title	Central Reclamation, Phase III Environmental Monitoring & Audit Monthly Report No. 6 - January 2004
	Name			Sign	Date
Prepared by :	Albert Chan, ACL - Environmental Consultant				10 Feb. 2004
Reviewed by :	Susana Bezy, ACL – ET Leader				10 Feb. 2004
Authorised by :	Jon Varndell, ACL – Project Mgr				10 Feb. 2004

Distribution
Copy No	Issue to		Attention		Corr. Ref.
1	TDD		Mr H H Yeung		3128/M45/200/OC5706/al
2, 3	EPD		Mr M W Ho		3128/M45/200/OC5706/al
4	EPD (LCO)		Mr Allan Hung		3128/M45/200/OC5706/al
5	Leighton-China State-Van Oord JV		Mr Malcolm Plummer		3128/M45/200/OC5706/al
6	CRIII Sites/PRE		Mr Douglas Miller		3128/M45/200/OC5706/al
7	Independent Checker (Environment)		Mr Bill Douglas		3128/M45/200/OC5706/al
8	Environmental Team Leader		Ms Susana Bezy		3128/M45/200/OC5706/al
9	Office Copy

ACL	Atkins China Limited
CRIII	Central Reclamation Phase III
EIA	Environmental Impact Assessment
EM&A	Environmental Monitoring and Audit
EPD	Environmental Protection Department
ER	Engineer’s Representatives
ET	Environmental Team
IEC	Independent Environmental Checker
LCSD	Leisure and Cultural Services Department
LCSVO-JV	Leighton China State Van Oord Joint Venture
TDD	Territory Development Department
TSP	Total Suspended Particulates
WMP	Waste Management Plan

Item	Item Description	Date of Application	Permit Status
1	LCSVO-JV submitted a Permit to Dump Material (Contaminated Sediment) at Sea under the Dumping at Sea Ordinance (Ref. H2189/U2c/5143/AT/CST/EY/ST/ec).	27 January 2004	-
2	LCSVO-JV submitted an Application for Renewal of Construction Noise Permit No. PP-TS0032-03 for Percussive Piling near Pier 7, Central (Ref. H2189/U2c /5071/MP/CST/DZ/ST/cm).	15 January 2004	-
3	LCSVO-JV submitted an Application for Renewal of Construction Noise Permit No. GW-TS0478-03 for Percussive Piling near Pier 7, Central (Ref. H2189/U2c /5055/MP/CST/EY/ST/cm).	14 January 2004	Approved on 30 January 2004
4	LCSVO-JV submitted an Application for Wastewater Discharge Licence under the Water Pollution Control Ordinance (Ref. 2189/U2c/4951/MP/ATA/CKA/ST/cm)	8 January 2004	-

Parameters	Descriptions	Locations		Frequencies		Duration
TSP	24-Hour TSP	2 Locations		Once every 6 days		During dust generating construction works
	1-Hour TSP	2 Locations		Three times in every 6 days		During dust generating construction works
Noise	Leq (30 mins), L₁₀, L_90,	1 Location		Continuous measurements		Two weeks before Construction and During Construction
Water Quality	Dissolved Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended Solids; Turbidity.	14 Locations		3 times a week, Mid-ebb/flood tides		During Marine Works
Waste	On-Site Waste Audit	Active Work Sites		Periodically		During Construction
	On-Site Waste Inspection
Landscape and Visual	Audits to ensure effective implementation of mitigation measures					During Construction
General Site Conditions	Environmental Site Inspection		Works areas and areas affected by works		Periodically	During Construction

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 Basic Project Information

2. Environmental Status

2.1 Works Undertaken

2.2 Environmental Permits

2.3 Environmental Document Submission

2.4 Environmental Meetings

2.5 Environmental Monitoring Locations

3. EM&A Requirements

3.1 Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements

3.2 Environmental Quality Performance Limits

3.3 Event Action Plan

3.4 Implementation of Environmental Measures

4. Monitoring Results

4.1 Impact Monitoring Schedule in January 2004

4.2 Monitoring Methodology

4.2.1 Air Quality Monitoring

4.2.2 Noise Quality Monitoring

4.2.3 Water Quality Monitoring

4.3 Monitoring Equipment

4.3.1 Air Quality

4.3.2 Noise Quality

4.3.3 Water Quality

4.4 Impact Monitoring Results

4.4.1 Air Quality & Noise Monitoring Results

4.4.2 Water Quality Monitoring Results

4.4.3 Waste Management

4.4.4 Landscape and Visual

5. Environmental Complaint and Non-Compliance

5.1 Environmental Exceedances

5.1.1 Air Quality

5.1.2 Noise Quality

5.1.3 Water Quality

5.1.4 Waste Management

5.1.5 Landscape and Visual

5.1.6 Site Environmental Audit

5.2 Environmental Complaint and Prosecution

6. Forecast and Schedule

6.1 Key Issues for the Coming Month

6.2 Monitoring Schedules for the Next 3 Months

6.3 Construction Programme for the Next 3 Months

7. Conclusion