Central Reclamation,
Phase III
Quarterly EM&A
Report No. 9
(August through
October 2005)
|
Client |
Civil Engineering Development Department, |
|||||||
|
Project |
Supplementary Agreement No. 3 to Agreement No. CE
15/94 Design and Construction for the Minimum Option |
|||||||
|
Report
No. |
3128-REP-2 |
|||||||
|
Date of Issue |
|
File
Ref. L:\S-proj\CR3\CR3.NEW\3128\ |
||||||
|
Report Title |
Central Reclamation, Phase III Quarterly EM&A Report No. 9 August through October 2005 |
|||||||
|
|
Name |
|
Sign |
|
Date |
|
||
|
Prepared
by : |
David
Sanderson, ACL - Senior Consultant |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Reviewed by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Authorised by : |
Jon
Varndell, ACL – Project Mgr |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Distribution |
|
|
||||||
|
Copy No |
Issue to |
Attention |
Corr. Ref. |
|||||
|
1 |
CEDD |
Mr
Eric K.W. Fung |
3128/M45/200/OC7986/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
2, 3 |
EPD |
Mr M
W Ho |
3128/M45/200/OC7986/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
4 |
EPD
(LCO) |
Mr
Allan Hung |
3128/M45/200/OC7986/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
5 |
Leighton-China
State-Van Oord JV |
Mr
Malcolm Plummer |
3128/M45/200/OC7986/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
6 |
CRIII Sites/PRE |
Mr
Douglas Miller |
3128/M45/200/OC7986/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
7 |
Independent
Checker (Environment) |
Mr
Bill Douglas |
3128/M45/200/OC7986/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
8 |
Environmental
Team Leader |
Ms |
3128/M45/200/OC7986/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
9 |
Office
Copy |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
1.2 Project Organisation and Management Structure
2.1 Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
2.2 Environmental Quality Performance Limits
3.1 Implementation of Environmental Measures
3.2 Environmental Monitoring Locations
3.3 Air Quality Monitoring Results
3.4 Noise Quality Monitoring Results
3.5 Water Quality Monitoring Results
3.6 Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status
3.7 Landscape and Visual Audit
4. Environmental
Complaint and Non-Compliance
4.3 Summary of Actions Taken by the Contractor
4.5 Environmental Complaints and Prosecutions
4.6 Record of Environmental Complaints and
Summons & Prosecutions
List of Annexes
Annex
A Project
Organisation/ Contact Information
Annex
B Quality Performance
Limits for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex
C Event and Action Plans
for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex
D Monitoring Stations
Locations
Annex
E Contractor's Works
Programme
Annex
F Graphical Representation
of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
G Graphical Representation
of Noise Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
H Graphical Representation
of Water Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
I Quarterly Assessment of
Construction Impacts on Suspended Solids
List of Tables
Table
2.1 - Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements............................................ 3
Table 4.1 - Summary of Complaints Received...................................................... 12
|
ACL |
Atkins China Limited |
|
CEDD |
Civil Engineering and Development Department |
|
CRIII |
Central Reclamation Phase III |
|
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
|
EM&A |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit |
|
EPD |
Environmental Protection Department |
|
ER |
Engineer’s Representatives |
|
ET |
Environmental Team |
|
IEC |
Independent Environmental Checker |
|
LCSD |
Leisure and Cultural Services Department |
|
LCSVO-JV |
Leighton-China State-Van Oord
Joint Venture |
|
TDD |
Territory Development Department |
|
TSP |
Total Suspended Particulates |
Executive Summary
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been appointed by TDD (now
called the Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) after the merger
of the Civil Engineering Department and the Territory Development Department on
1 July 2004) to implement the Environmental Monitoring and Audit
(EM&A) programme that was identified in the EIA Report for the CRIII
Project and is providing Environmental Team services during the duration of the
construction works.
This is the ninth quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress
Air, Noise and
water quality monitoring were conducted during this quarter. Weekly environmental site inspections were also
conducted during the reporting quarter.
Exceedances of Action and Limit Levels
No air quality exceedances were recorded during the reporting period.
Continuous noise monitoring was carried out during the reporting period
and noise exceedances were recorded August (Total 9 Days), September (Total 6)
and October (Total 3) 2005. The
exceedances were investigated and were found not to be attributed to the project
works but rather to be a combination of the Hong Kong Electric’s Contractors
laying a below ground cable directly in front of City Hall, the façade
renovation works at City Hall (less than 4m from the external microphone) and
general peak bus and taxi traffic drop off flows in front of City Hall.
Elevated SS levels were recorded in August (Total 1 day), September
(Total 1 day) and October (Total 5 days).
Elevated DO levels were recorded in August (Total 14 days), September
(Total 10 days) and October (Total 12 days).
For both parameters these exceedances were not found to be attributable
to the project works but rather natural variation in water quality across the
site and beyond.
Precautionary mitigation measures implemented during the quarter included
the strengthening of bund along vulnerable edges of the reclamation to reduce
run-off; the maintenance of catch pits to retain run-off and settlement tanks
to settle out SS before discharge. As
the dry season approached, water bouwsing of haul
roads and dry exposed areas on site was introduced. At Public Pier West,
improved sediment retention measures were introduced to catch bore-pile
discharge sediments.
Complaint Log
In September 2005, an enquiry was received by the ER from the facilities
management offices of the MTRC, IFC and the Four Seasons Hotel concerning the
quality of their intake water east of the M11 intake at the Outlying Islands
Ferry Piers, Central.
Notifications
of Summons and Prosecutions
There were
no notifications of summons or prosecutions received during this reporting
quarter.
Site Inspection and Audit
Weekly environmental site inspections were
carried out during this quarter. Any
minor deficiencies noted during the site inspections were rectified by the
Contractor upon receipt of notification.
The Contractor was requested by the ET to
produce a Drainage Management Plan for the site in order to control site
drainage discharges to the marine environment during the rainy season, which
they duly submitted. So far the
contractor has introduced measures to control drainage with some success in
accordance with their plan. However,
some small discharge incidents were identified during the reporting period and
the ER, the ET and the Contractor are thus in continual dialogue to improve this
plan and its implementation.
The
Territory Development Department (TDD) (now called the Civil Engineering and
Development Department (CEDD) after the merger of the Civil Engineering
Department and the Territory Development Department on 1 July 2004) of the Hong
Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) is constructing the Central
Reclamation Phase III project (CRIII).
The Main Works Contract HK 12/02 for CRIII commenced on
The
Contractor's works programme for the quarter is provided in Annex
E.
Atkins China Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by TDD (now called
CEDD), the employer, to undertake the environmental monitoring and audit work
for the project. ACL is also the
Resident Engineers for the project and LCSVO-JV is the main contractor. An Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)
has been employed to audit the EM&A programme. The contacts of key management are provided
in Annex
A.
The works undertaken in the project area requiring environmental
monitoring and audit as identified in the EIA Report (not including
·
Architectural works for Pier 7;
·
Pile cap and beam construction at Pier 8; lower,
middle and upper deck construction;
·
Piling work and concreting works at Public Pier
West;
·
·
MYS footbridge pile cap, column construction and
cross head construction;
·
MYS storm drainage, sewers, watermains
and roadworks to pier areas;
·
MYS Laying of 800 dia.
Cooling
·
MYS Existing Culvert F – preparation for desilting and stabilisation
works for culvert and U-Trap structure
·
MYS Culvert F Extension –preparation for piling for Bay 1;
·
Sand filling and rock filling works at IRAE;
·
Temporary seawall construction at IRAE;
·
In-situ work to caisson and pumping stations at
IRAE;
·
Temporary diversion of Culvert J, SI works and piling;
·
Deep compaction works on IRAE;
·
Eastern Seawall bored piling;
·
ESB (S8.1 & S9.1) –structural works;
·
ESB (S11.1 & S11.2) –ABWF and E&M works;
·
Maintenance and necessary repair works for seawater
intake silt screens.
·
Cooling water main construction;
The EM&A
programme requires environmental monitoring for air quality, noise, water
quality, waste management and landscape and visual aspects as specified in the
CRIII Project EIA. The EM&A
requirements for each issue area are described in subsequent sections
including:
·
All required monitoring parameters;
·
Action and Limit Levels; and
·
Event-Action Plans.
A summary of
impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 2-1.
|
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Duration |
||
|
TSP |
24-Hour
TSP |
2
Locations |
Once
every 6 days |
During
dust generating construction works |
||
|
1-Hour
TSP |
2
Locations |
Three
times in every 6 days |
During
dust generating construction works |
|||
|
Noise |
Leq (30 mins), L10, L90, |
1
Location |
Continuous
measurements |
Two
weeks before Construction and During Construction |
||
|
Water
Quality |
Dissolved
Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended
Solids; Turbidity. |
14
Locations |
3 times
a week, Mid-ebb/flood tides |
During
Marine Works and for 4 weeks after completion of Marine Works |
||
|
Waste |
On-Site
Waste Audit |
Active
Work Sites |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
||
|
On-Site
Waste Inspection |
||||||
|
Landscape
and Visual |
Audits
to ensure effective implementation of mitigation measures |
During Construction |
||||
|
General
Site Conditions |
Environmental
Site Inspection |
Works
areas and areas affected by works |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
||
Environmental
Quality Performance Limits for dust, noise and water quality have been
established as part of the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex
B.
Event Action
Plans for air, noise and water quality have been developed as part of the
Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex C.
The Contractor
has implemented relevant mitigation measures listed in the EIA Report, EM&A
Manual and Further Environmental Permit.
Seawater intake silt screens have been installed prior to the start of
the dredging works and a silt curtain attached to a floating steel frame is
installed around the grab dredger when used.
Drawings showing
the project area and locations of the monitoring stations are provided in Annex
D.
Air quality
monitoring commenced on
The graphical
plot of noise monitoring results for this quarter is provided in Annex G.
The graphical
plot of water quality monitoring results for this quarter is provided in Annex
H.
Solid and liquid
waste management was implemented according to the Waste Management Plan during
the reporting quarter.
As the works undertaken during the reporting quarter were mainly related
to reclamation, buildings and infrastructure works, the landscape and visual
impacts are considered to be minimal.
There were no exceedances of air quality
attributable to the project works found during the reporting quarter.
Noise
exceedances were recorded on the 2, 3, 12, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30 and 31 August
2005; 3, 9, 10, 15, 16 and 20 September 2005; and the 1, 8, & 10 October 2005.
For August, September and October noise exceedances were attributed to a combination of the Hong Kong
Electric’s Contractors laying a below ground cable directly in front of City
Hall, the façade renovation works at City Hall (less than 4m from the external
microphone) and general peak bus and taxi traffic drop off flows in front of
City Hall.
Elevated levels of DO and SS were found during the reporting period,
particularly at the seawater intake stations along the coast.
DO
29 Aug 2005, exceedances of the AL were recorded at stations M1, M2, M3,
M5, M11 and M12; as well as the LL at M4A during the mid-ebb tide and
exceedance of the AL at stations M1, M2, M3, M5, M6, M11 and M12; as well as
the LL at M4A during the mid-flood tide.
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
SS
On
On
On
On
On
On
On
A statistical
analysis (Annex I) of the monitoring results generally found the
quarterly mean is significantly less than 1.3 times of the ambient mean
recorded during the baseline period. This
indicates that the Project construction works generally did not cause any
adverse impact on SS levels during the reporting period with respect to the
baseline condition.
None of the
observed exceedances were found to be directly attributed to site works, as
most of the major marine works have been completed, the remaining marine works
undertaken during the period such as placement of rock armour rock armour
re-adjustment and bore piling for the western seawall of FRAE did not result in
significant disturbance to the seabed or creating of excessive suspended
solids. For the most part there was
minimal run-off of silty waters from the site, however, heavy rainfall was
experienced and some run-off of silty water was identified. However, the quantities observed were not
considered large enough to have a significant effect on the intake stations
water quality. Rainfall level dropped of
in September through to October as the winter monsoon dry season arrived.
In the previous
quarter the ER and ET requested the Contractor to produce a Drainage Management
Plan (DMP) to control site run-off. The
Contractor has since produced and implemented their plan, which has helped
control run-off from the site. However,
some silty water discharges were recorded in this quarter and there is
therefore room for improvement in both the Contractors DMP and its
implementation.
The Contractors
Drainage Management Plan is under periodic review by the Contractor, the ER and
the ET.
No
no-compliances were reported in the quarter.
The Contractor has
implemented the following measures to prevent the discharge of SS and control
off site transport of sediments and dust:
·
General maintenance of bunds, drainage channels,
catch-pits and wheel wash bays.
·
Provision of rock and sand bunds along culvert J,
IRAE;
·
Blockage of run-off direct discharge points at Pier
8, allowing run-off to seep into reclamation sand;
·
Provision of further catch pits to collect spill
over from wheel washing facilities; increased frequency of cleaning of
catch-pits.
·
Contractor site guards now stopping all drivers and
instructing them to hose wheels clean before leaving the site;
·
Public Pier West, provision of tarpaulin sheets on
deck with sand bag walls to collect bore pile drilling sediments; sediments
collected and disposed on land.
·
Commencement of water bowsing
in October to control dust on haul roads and other areas of the site. Covering of stock piles with tarpaulin as
well as automatic watering of larger stock piles to prevent dust generation.
No environmental enquiries were received during the reporting quarter.
In June, a water quality complaint was received from ArchSD
concerning the quality of their intake waters.
In September the management facilities office that serves the MTRC, IFC
and the Four Seasons Hotel in Central contacted the RE to express concern over
the quality of their cooling water intake water.
ArchSD advised CEDD at the
end of June 2005 that the water quality from their intake located at Intake
Station M5 had been experiencing reduced water quality over the last six
months. An initial investigation was
carried out of the monitoring data for Intake Station M5 and no overall decline
in water quality was identified with the exception of six spikes in suspended
solid concentration in 2005. An
investigation identified four of the spikes were due to filling activities at IRAE
(now finished) and two to discharges from Culvert L.
A meeting between ArchSD and the ET was held
on the
It was concluded that, based on the information available to the ET,
there did not appear to be a clear link between the project work and siltation encountered by ArchSD. However, when intake M5 is relocated to the
front of IRAE next year, it is expected that the water quality at the intake
will improve due to increased flushing of water and greater distance from
Culvert L. A response was issued to ArchSD on the
The management facilities office that serves the
MTRC, IFC and Four Seasons Hotel in Central contacted Atkins ER site office to
express concern over the quality of their cooling water intake water. A meeting was held with the above, CEDD, the
ER, the ET and the Contractor, on the
The following table summarises all the complaints attributable to
project works received (both written and verbal) and the liaison/consultation
undertaken, and the actions and follow-up procedures taken.
|
Month/
Date of Complaint |
Media |
Complaint
& Action |
Liaison/
Consultation Taken |
Follow-up
Action |
|
June 2005 |
Water |
ArchSD made complaint
concerning quality of intake water at Station M5,
initial investigation did not show elevated Suspended Solid levels. |
ArchSD, CEDD, Contractor,, ER,
IEC, ET |
Site inspection carried out
by ET and ArchSD, water samples taken, report
prepared and submitted to ArchSD. |
|
September 2005 |
Water |
The management facilities
office that serves the MTRC, IFC and Four Seasons Hotel in Central contacted
Atkins ER site office to express concern over the quality of their cooling
water intake water. Meeting held with
above to discuss issues. |
MTR, IFC and Four Seasons Facilities Mang.
Office, CEDD, Contractor, ER, ET |
No further communication has
been received from the management facilities office during the reporting
quarter. |
There were no notifications of summons and
prosecutions during the reporting quarter.
During environmental site inspections conducted
during the reporting quarter, no non-compliances were noted.
No prosecutions were received during the reporting
quarter.
Air quality measurements were within the
Noise
exceedances were recorded in August, September and October, these exceedances
were attributed to a combination of the
Hong Kong Electric’s Contractors laying a below ground cable directly in front
of City Hall, the façade renovation works at City Hall (less than 4m from the
external microphone) and general peak bus and taxi traffic drop off flows in
front of City Hall.
The water quality within the
project area was found to be generally good at the marine stations during the
reporting period. However, the intake
stations along the seawall showed reduced DO levels for most of the quarter to
that below the
Investigations indicated that while there were frequent exceedances of
the