Item	Document Title	Version	Date of Submission to ER
1	Admission Ticket (5363) for Disposal of Special Waste (excavated material generated from the removal of fuel tanks at Helipad) at Landfill (Ref. H2189/C1/13190/MP/ DC/CKA/ST/ec).	-	13 April 2005
2	Disposal of Chemical Waste – 600 organic solvent containers (Ref. H2189/C1/13184/MP/ST/cm)	-	13 April 2005
3	Temporary Caisson Storage for Deliveries 9 and 10 (Ref. H2189/C1/13067/MP/PC/EY/DS/ST/MB/HF/cm)	-	7 April 2005

No	Certification Subject	Letter Ref.	Date of Submission to EPD	Approved Status
1	Certification of Monthly Environmental Report No. 20 - March 2005	3128/HK12/02 M45/200/OC7070/SB/AC/ec	14 April 2005	-

4. Monitoring Results

4.1 Impact Monitoring Schedule in April 2005

Regular site inspections were carried out to assess whether the project's environmental protection and pollution control measures are in compliance with the contract specifications. Inspections were conducted on 7, 14, 21 and 28 April 2005.

Air quality monitoring commenced on 21 April 2005.

Continuous 24-hour noise monitoring was conducted during this reporting period.

Impact water quality monitoring at all monitoring stations was undertaken during this reporting month. The water quality monitoring schedule for April 2005 is presented in Table 4.1.

Table 4.1 - Water Quality Monitoring Programme (Seawater Intakes Stations)

Date of Sampling	Tidal State	Timing of Sampling
1 April 2005	Mid Ebb	15:12 – 17:59
1 April 2005	Mid Flood	07:20 – 10:53
4 April 2005	Mid Ebb	08:23 – 11:06
4 April 2005	Mid Flood	12:13 – 14:50
6 April 2005	Mid Ebb	10:01 – 12:43
6 April 2005	Mid Flood	14:53 – 17:34
8 April 2005	Mid Ebb	11:01 – 13:43
8 April 2005	Mid Flood	15:20 – 17:59
11 April 2005	Mid Ebb	12:20 – 15:03
11 April 2005	Mid Flood	07:34 – 11:08
13 April 2005	Mid Ebb	13:14 – 16:05
13 April 2005	Mid Flood	07:32 – 11:01
15 April 2005	Mid Ebb	15:15 – 17:51
15 April 2005	Mid Flood	07:37 – 10:59
18 April 2005	Mid Ebb	15:17 – 17:57
18 April 2005	Mid Flood	07:36 – 10:59
20 April 2005	Mid Ebb	09:26 – 12:13
20 April 2005	Mid Flood	13:46 – 16:35
22 April 2005	Mid Ebb	10:20 – 13:10
22 April 2005	Mid Flood	15:13 – 17:46
25 April 2005	Mid Ebb	11:54 – 14:38
25 April 2005	Mid Flood	07:06 – 10:36
27 April 2005	Mid Ebb	12:18 – 15:04
27 April 2005	Mid Flood	07:03 – 10:36
29 April 2005	Mid Ebb	13:52 – 16:40
29 April 2005	Mid Flood	07:08 – 10:45

4.2 Monitoring Methodology

4.2.1 Air Quality Monitoring

Air quality monitoring was performed in accordance with the methodology described in the EM&A Manual commencing on 21 April 2005. The locations of the monitoring stations at City Hall and PLA Headquarters are shown in Annex C.

4.2.2 Noise Quality Monitoring

Continuous 24-hour noise monitoring was performed in accordance with the methodology described in the EM&A Manual in the reporting period. The location of the noise monitoring station at City Hall is shown in Annex C.

4.2.3 Water Quality Monitoring

Water quality monitoring was performed in accordance with the methodology described in the EM&A Manual. Monitoring for the reporting month was conducted at all stations, which comprises of 6 marine-based stations and 8 seawater intake stations. The locations of the monitoring stations are shown in Annex C.

4.3 Monitoring Equipment

4.3.1 Air Quality

The equipment that is used for air quality monitoring is listed in Table 4.2.

Table 4.2 - Equipment for Air Quality Monitoring

Parameter Measured	Equipment
24-Hour Sampling	High Volume Sampler Model GS2310 by Anderson Instruments to be used for both monitoring stations.
1-Hour Sampling	MicroDust pro Aerosol Monitoring System to be used for both monitoring locations.

4.3.2 Noise Quality

The equipment used for continuous noise quality monitoring is listed in Table 4.3.

Table 4.3 - Noise Monitoring Equipment

Equipment	Model
Integrated Sound Level Meter (SLM)	B&K 2238
Calibrator	B&K 4231, Class 1

4.3.3 Water Quality

The equipment that was used for water quality monitoring is listed in Table 4.4.

Table 4.4 - Equipment Used for Marine Water Quality Monitoring

Parameter Measured	Equipment
Dissolved Oxygen and Temperature Measuring Equipment	A Dissolved Oxygen meter YSI model 58 was used. · This instrument was portable and weatherproof and used a DC power source. The equipment was capable of measuring: · DO levels in the range of 0-20 mg/l and 0-200% saturation; and · Temperature of between 0 - 45 degree Celsius. · The equipment had a membrane electrode with an automatic temperature compensation complete with a cable. In addition, a Wirling Psychrometer was used as a reference thermometer during the sampling.
Turbidity Measurement Instrument	A Turbidimeter, HACH model 2100P was used for determining turbidity levels. The instrument is portable and weatherproof and uses a DC power source. The instrument includes a photoelectric sensor capable of measuring turbidity between 0-1000 NTU.
PH	A MP125 pH Meter from Mettler Toledo was used to measure pH.
Salinity / Conductivity Meter	A Salinity / Conductivity meter YSI model 63 and model 30 was used for determining salinity concentrations.
Sample Containers and Storage	Water samples for SS analysis were stored in high density polythene bottles with no preservative added, packed in ice and delivered to the laboratory, and analysed as soon as possible after collection.

4.3.4 Equipment Calibration

The calibration frequencies of the monitoring equipment are provided in Table 4.5.

Table 4.5 - Equipment Calibration Frequencies

Equipment	Calibration Frequency	Latest Calibration Date
Dissolved Oxygen Meter	Every 6 months	28 January 2005
Turbidimeter	Every 3 months for secondary standards; meter is calibrated prior to each measurement to the secondary standards	1 March 2005
pH Meter	Prior to each sampling day	-
Pyschrometer	Every 6 months	19 February 2005
Integrated SLM	Every year	20 August 2004

4.4 Impact Monitoring Results

4.4.1 Air Quality & Noise Monitoring Results

Air quality monitoring work commenced on 21 April 2005 at the Central Barrack monitoring station. Monitoring was not conducted at the City Hall monitoring station because exterior renovation works were undertaken by City Hall at the elevated walkway area. Air quality monitoring at the City Hall monitoring station will commence once the exterior renovation works are completed.

The air quality monitoring results are provided in Annex F. Graphical representation of the air quality monitoring data is provided in Annex G.

Noise monitoring work was undertaken during the reporting period. The noise monitoring results are provided in Annex H. Graphical representation of the noise monitoring data is provided in Annex I.

4.4.2 Water Quality Monitoring Results

Water quality monitoring was undertaken at all water quality monitoring locations during the reporting period. The water quality monitoring results from this reporting period are presented in Annex J. Graphical representation of the water quality data is provided in Annex K. Summaries of the results are provided in Tables 4.5 to 4.9.

Marine-Based Stations

Monitoring stations M8 and M10 were selected as the marine-based impact stations as they are located outside the predicted influence of the dredging and reclamation works. The detection of water quality degradation at these two stations may indicate that project marine works are adversely affecting water quality in Victoria Harbour. Stations M7 and M9 are within the expected influence of the reclamation activities and are located along the works area boundary (or extent of the predicted sediment plume). As such, M7 and M9 are used as indicator stations to note any significant elevations in SS, turbidity or reductions in DO that may affect the marine-based impact monitoring stations.

Table 4.5 is a summary of the marine-based stations monitoring results during mid-ebb tide.

Table 4.5 - Summary of Mid-Ebb Results for Marine-Based Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO (S&M) mg/L	DO (B) mg/L	DO % Sat. (DA)	Turbidity (DA) NTU	SS (DA) mg/L
C1	min	6.5	6.3	79	2.6	3
	max	7.8	7.1	94	6.1	7
	avg	6.9	6.6	84	4.0	5
	sd	0.3	0.2	4	0.9	1
C2	min	6.3	6.1	76	2.4	3
	max	7.8	7.2	94	4.2	6
	avg	7.0	6.7	85	3.3	5
	sd	0.4	0.3	5	0.7	1
M7	min	6.3	6.1	77	2.5	3
	max	7.1	7.4	90	5.4	8
	avg	6.5	6.5	81	4.1	5
	sd	0.3	0.3	4	0.8	1
M8	min	6.3	6.2	77	2.6	4
	max	8.0	7.7	99	5.2	7
	avg	6.8	6.7	84	3.9	5
	sd	0.4	0.4	6	0.8	1
M9	min	6.3	6.1	76	2.5	4
	max	7.6	7.7	96	6.0	7
	avg	6.6	6.6	82	4.5	5
	sd	0.3	0.4	5	1.3	1
M10	min	6.4	6.3	78	2.6	3
	max	7.9	7.4	96	5.2	8
	avg	6.7	6.7	83	3.8	5
	sd	0.4	0.3	5	0.8	1

As Table 4.5 shows, DO levels at marine-based impact stations (M8 & M10) in the surface to middle layer during mid-ebb survey ranged between 4.4 and 7.0 mg/L with an average value of 6.1 mg/L and DO measurements in the bottom layer ranged from 4.4 to 7.0 mg/L with an average level of 6.0 mg/L. Similar DO levels were recorded at the control stations at which DO levels in the surface to middle layer during mid-ebb survey ranged from 5.3 to 7.1 mg/L with an average value of around 6.4 mg/L; DO measurements in the bottom layer ranged between 5.3 and 7.1 mg/L with an average level of 6.3 mg/L.

SS levels during mid-ebb tide ranged from 3 to 10 mg/L with an average value of 5 mg/L at the marine-based impact stations (M8 & M10), which is comparable to results from the control stations in which SS content ranged from 3 to 9 mg/L with an average of 5 mg/L. Generally, the results showed no clear gradient effect, which indicates that marine works are not adversely affecting marine water quality outside the work site boundary in Victoria Harbour. Marine water quality at impact monitoring stations was found to be similar to that at the control stations also indicating that project marine works were generally not adversely affecting water quality in Victoria Harbour.

Table 4.6 is a summary of monitoring results from marine-based stations during mid-flood tide.

Table 4.6 - Summary of Mid-Flood Results for Marine-Based Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO (S&M) mg/L	DO (B) mg/L	DO % Sat. (DA)	Turbidity (DA) NTU	SS (DA) mg/L
C1	min	4.5	61	4.3	5	4.5
	max	6.6	90	10.8	12	6.6
	avg	5.3	72	6.6	8	5.3
	sd	4.5	61	4.3	5	4.5
C2	min	6.6	6.4	80	2.0	4
	max	7.6	7.4	94	4.5	6
	avg	7.0	6.7	86	3.2	5
	sd	0.3	0.3	4	0.7	1
M7	min	5.8	5.7	74	3.0	3
	max	6.7	7.0	84	5.7	7
	avg	6.3	6.4	79	4.3	5
	sd	0.3	0.4	4	0.8	1
M8	min	6.3	6.4	79	2.7	3
	max	7.5	7.3	92	5.2	9
	avg	6.8	6.7	84	3.7	5
	sd	0.3	0.3	3	0.9	2
M9	min	5.0	4.9	64	2.7	3
	max	7.0	7.1	87	5.3	7
	avg	6.4	6.3	79	4.1	5
	sd	0.5	0.5	6	0.8	1
M10	min	5.2	5.2	67	2.5	3
	max	7.2	7.3	89	5.0	7
	avg	6.6	6.5	81	3.6	5
	sd	0.5	0.5	5	0.7	1

During mid-flood tide, DO levels at marine-based impact stations (M8 & M10) in the surface to middle layer ranged from 5.4 to 8.3 mg/L with an average level of 6.4 mg/L while DO values in the bottom layer ranged between 5.2 and 7.2 mg/L with an average of 6.2 mg/L. Similar DO concentrations were recorded at the control stations in the surface to middle layer during mid-flood survey ranged between 5.5 and 8.1 mg/L with an average value of 6.6 mg/L and DO results in the bottom layer ranged from 5.3 and 7.1 mg/L with an average of 6.3 mg/L.

SS content ranged between 3 and 8 mg/L (for stations M8 & M10) with an average of 5 mg/L during mid-flood tide and ranged from 3 to 9 mg/L with an average value of 5 mg/L at the control stations. Again, the results showed no clear gradient effect and no significant difference between control stations and marine-based impact stations. Therefore, the marine-based station results indicate that during the reporting month the dredging works were not adversely affecting water quality outside the work site boundary.

Seawater Intake Stations

Table 4.7 is a summary of monitoring results from seawater intake stations during mid-ebb tide.

Table 4.7 - Summary of Mid-Ebb Results for Seawater Intake Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO mg/L	DO % Sat.	Turbidity NTU	SS mg/L
M1	min	4.3	58	5.6	6
	max	6.5	89	10.9	13
	avg	5.3	73	7.6	9
	sd	0.7	9	1.4	2
M2	min	3.7	50	5.8	9
	max	6.0	81	27.9	40
	avg	5.0	68	9.4	14
	sd	0.7	8	5.7	8
M3	min	3.4	46	4.5	7
	max	6.3	85	21.3	28
	avg	5.0	67	7.5	11
	sd	0.9	11	4.5	6
M4	min	4.4	62	3.5	5
	max	6.4	87	28.4	40
	avg	5.3	71	9.1	13
	sd	0.6	8	6.9	10
M5	min	4.7	65	2.7	4
	max	6.6	90	9.3	11
	avg	5.4	73	4.9	7
	sd	0.6	8	1.5	2
M6	min	4.3	59	2.9	4
	max	6.7	91	6.3	10
	avg	5.5	74	4.8	7
	sd	4.3	59	2.9	4
M11	min	4.3	59	2.9	4
	max	7.0	94	7.4	9
	avg	5.5	75	5.3	7
	sd	0.7	9	1.5	2
M12	min	4.5	63	3.1	5
	max	6.6	89	6.2	9
	avg	5.4	73	4.6	7
	sd	0.6	7	1.0	2

Seawater intake results during mid-ebb tide, Table 4.7, show that DO levels ranged from 3.4 to 7.0 mg/L with an average of 5.3 mg/L. SS ranged between 4 and 40 mg/L with an average value of 9 mg/L. Elevated SS levels were recorded on 1, 6, 18 and 20 April during mid-ebb tide sampling.

Table 4.8 is a summary of monitoring results from seawater intake stations during mid-flood tide.

Table 4.8 - Summary of Mid-Flood Results for Seawater Intake Stations

Station		Parameter
Station		DO mg/L	DO % Sat.	Turbidity NTU	SS mg/L
M1	min	4.5	61	4.3	5
	max	6.6	90	10.8	12
	avg	5.3	72	6.6	8
	sd	4.5	61	4.3	5
M2	min	4.5	62	3.9	6
	max	6.3	85	12.4	16
	avg	5.2	70	6.8	10
	sd	0.5	7	2.4	3
M3	min	4.5	61	3.6	6
	max	6.4	85	11.6	14
	avg	5.3	71	6.2	8
	sd	0.6	8	2.0	2
M4	min	4.7	63	3.9	6
	max	6.4	88	14.1	16
	avg	5.3	72	7.3	10
	sd	0.5	8	3.0	3
M5	min	4.6	61	3.1	4
	max	7.1	97	7.9	12
	avg	5.5	73	4.5	7
	sd	0.7	11	1.5	3
M6	min	4.5	60	3.2	3
	max	7.7	106	7.8	11
	avg	5.5	74	4.8	7
	sd	0.9	13	1.4	2
M11	min	4.6	63	3.2	5
	max	6.8	91	9.4	10
	avg	5.5	73	4.9	6
	sd	0.6	8	1.6	1
M12	min	4.7	62	3.1	4
	max	6.9	95	6.4	9
	avg	5.5	74	4.5	7
	sd	0.7	10	1.0	1

During mid-flood survey, Table 4.8 shows that DO levels at seawater intake stations ranged from 4.5 to 7.7 mg/L with an average of 5.4 mg/L. SS ranged from 3 to 16 mg/L with an average SS contennerally good. Elevated SS levels were found on 4, 18, 20, 25 and 27 April during mid-flood tide sat of 8 mg/L. The above results show that water quality during mid-flood tide was also gempling.

4.4.3 Waste Management

No waste management audit was scheduled within this reporting period. The arrangement of waste management audit is detailed in the Waste Management Plan.

4.4.4 Landscape and Visual

As the major construction activities undertaken during the reporting month were related to marine works, the landscape and visual impacts are considered to be minimal.

5. Environmental Complaint and Non-Compliance

5.1 Environmental Exceedances

The total number of exceedances for air, noise and water quality are presented in following sections.

5.1.1 Air Quality

No air quality exceedances were recorded during the reporting period.

5.1.2 Noise Quality

Noise exceedances were recorded on 7 and 8 April 2005. Investigations found that the exceedances were not project related as no project works are located in the vicinity of City Hall.

5.1.3 Water Quality

Water quality was found to be generally good during the reporting month. However, elevated SS levels were recorded on 1, 4, 6, 18, 20, 25 and 27 April 2005.

The SS exceedances recorded on 1 and 4 April were found to be caused by the re-suspension of sand fill material due to marine vessel movements at IRAE. All parties were immediately informed of the exceedances and the Contractor immediately ordered all marine vessels in the area to reduce their speed. Further, the Contractor temporarily suspended sand filling works until the seawater intake at station M4 was relocated. The intake was relocated on 8 April 2005, and monitoring station M4 (now called M4A) was relocated in tandem to the new position.

The SS exceedance recorded at station M2 on 6 April was not project related. An investigation found that the exceedance was attributable to the routine cleaning of HSBC’s seawater intake by HSBC’s contractors.

The SS exceedances recorded on 18, 20, 25 April were investigated and were found to be due to the laying of filter material and propeller wash of pelican barges entering IRAE. All parties were immediately informed of the exceedances and an environmental meeting was held on 26 April 2005 to discuss measures to prevent SS dispersion from the works at IRAE. During the meeting, the Contractor proposed measures, which included the use of sampans to assist the movement of barges to reduce the effect of propeller wash, the reduction of sand filling rates, the use of floating silt curtains for laying of filter material, carry out diving inspections of affected intakes and to expedite the construction of the western rock mound at IRAE. Additionally, daily SS sampling at M3 and M4A was initiated on 27 April 2005 and was undertaken until 3 May 2005. No further exceedances were recorded after 27 April 2005.

As for the SS exceedance recorded at M4A on 27 April, an investigation found that it was likely attributable to silty water dispersing from the gap between caisson units C23 and P8.1. Tidal current likely carried SS towards the area near M4A. However, no exceedances were recorded at M3, likely because of its relatively sheltered location. The Contractor mitigated the situation by installing seawall blocks between the gap to enclose the reclamation area.

DO exceedances were recorded on 25 and 29 April during mid-ebb tide. However, investigation into the exceedances found that they were not due to project works.

5.1.4 Waste Management

No non-compliances with regard to waste management were recorded in the reporting month.

5.1.5 Landscape and Visual

No non-compliance with regard to landscape and visual aspects were recorded in the reporting month.

5.1.6 Site Environmental Audit

No environmental non-compliances were found during environmental site inspections conducted during the reporting period.

A summary of the findings from the site inspections conducted during the reporting month is provided in Table 5.1.

Table 5.1 - Summary of Environmental Site Inspections

Date of Inspection	Observations	Action(s)
7 April 2005	Silty water was seen dispersing from the western edge of IRAE and the gap between caisson units at IRAE.	The Contractor advised that they would install a floating silt curtain at the western side of IRAE. Further, the Contractor advised that the Central Barrack intake would be relocated to the western edge of IRAE on 8 April 2005. It is expected that the water quality at the new intake location would greatly improve.
14 April 2005	No deficiencies were observed.	No actions are required.
21 April 2005	During the inspection, it was noted that the Contractor did not immediately close the silt curtain at the marine access to IRAE after barges entered the area.	The Contractor was reminded to be extra vigilant on enclosing the marine entrance to IRAE to prevent the dispersion of SS.
	Black fumes were observed emitting from the exhaust of a number of marine vessels in IRAE.	The Contractor was committed to require sub-contractors to properly maintain all marine equipment.
	A small amount of spilled oil was found around an oil container belonging to Fugro at IRAW.	The Contractor was advised to install a larger drip tray underneath the Fugro oil container.
	Some wash water was found flowing onto the access road at CR-12.	The Contractor was advised to improve the wheel washing area at CR-12 and to prevent wash water from flowing onto the adjacent road.
28 April 2005	A rammer leaking a small amount of hydraulic fluid was found at CR-12.	The Contractor was asked to clean up the leaked hydraulic fluid at CR-12 immediately.
	A small amount of silty water was observed leaking from the vertical seawall adjacent to the pre-bored H-piling works at CR-3.	The Contractor was asked to lift the silt curtain located next to the vertical seawall at CR-3 slightly above water to reduce the dispersion of silty water.
	Black fumes were observed from the exhaust of an air compressor at CR-3.	The Contractor was asked to make necessary repairs to the air compressor at CR-3.

5.2 Environmental Complaint and Prosecution

A noise complaint on 3 April 2005 was relayed from the Water Front Division of the Police. Upon receipt of the complaint notice, the procedures listed under Table 7.1 “Procedures in the Event of a Complaint” in the EM&A Manual were immediately followed. The ER and Contractor were immediately notified of the complaint and an investigation was undertaken.

An investigation of the complaint found that it concerned noise arising from construction works near IRAE on 3 April 2005. It was noted that a RE’s representative presented a summary of Construction Noise Permits (CNP) for the construction site to the Police during the time of the complaint. The summary did not indicate the latest CNP No. RS-0170-05 issued on 24 March 2005 for works in IRAE, but instead showed the previous CNP No. RS-0475-04 for the works area. The summary was subsequently updated to reflect the latest issued CNPs for the project.

The investigation also found that there are no changes to the Contractor’s working methods and all necessary plant were covered under the respective CNP. Further, the continuous noise monitoring being undertaken for the project did not identify any noise exceedances during the time of complaint. As such, the Contractor is in compliance with EM&A requirements with respect to noise and no remedial measures are necessary.

Another complaint was received on 28 April 2005. Upon receipt of the complaint notice, the procedures listed under Table 7.1 “Procedures in the Event of a Complaint” in the EM&A Manual were again immediately followed. The ER and Contractor were immediately notified of the complaint and an investigation was undertaken.

The investigation found that the complaint concerned white smoke observed near Two IFC in Central on the morning of 19 April 2005. The source of the white smoke was not identified during a site visit by EPD, and as such, the complaint was likely due to an one-off event. However, some black fumes from plant and equipment located on site were observed. A subsequent site inspection by the ET on 21 April 2005 noted similar findings. The Contractor has been advised to properly maintain all plant and equipment on site so as to reduce black smoke emissions.

The investigation also found that there are no changes to the Contractor’s working methods and no non-compliances with respect to the EM&A requirements. The Contractor’s construction activities will continue to be monitored to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements.

5.3 Environmental Enquiries

No environmental enquiries were received during the reporting month.

Client	Civil Engineering and Development Department Hong Kong Island and Islands Development Office
Project	Supplementary Agreement No. 3 to Agreement No. CE 15/94 Central Reclamation, Phase III Design and Construction for the Minimum Option
Report No.	3128-REP-203-01	Copy No.
Date of Issue	30 May 2005	File Ref. L:\S-proj\CR3\CR3.NEW\ 3128\Reports\0203.doc
Report Title	Central Reclamation, Phase III Environmental Monitoring & Audit Monthly Report No. 21 - April 2005
	Name			Sign	Date
Prepared by :	Henry Ng, ACL - Environmental Consultant				30 May 2005
Reviewed by :	Susana Bezy, ACL – ET Leader				30 May 2005
Authorised by :	Jon Varndell, ACL – Project Mgr				30 May 2005

Distribution
Copy No	Issue to		Attention		Corr. Ref.
1	CEDD		Mr H H Yeung		3128/M45/200/OC7253/jm
2, 3	EPD		Mr M W Ho		3128/M45/200/OC7253/jm
4	EPD (LCO)		Mr Samson Cheng		3128/M45/200/OC7253/jm
5	Leighton-China State-Van Oord JV		Mr Malcolm Plummer		3128/M45/200/OC7253/jm
6	CRIII Sites/PRE		Mr Douglas Miller		3128/M45/200/OC7253/jm
7	Independent Checker (Environment)		Mr Bill Douglas		3128/M45/200/OC7253/jm
8	Environmental Team Leader		Ms Susana Bezy		3128/M45/200/OC7253/jm
9	Office Copy

ACL	Atkins China Limited
CEDD	Civil Engineering and Development Department
CRIII	Central Reclamation Phase III
EIA	Environmental Impact Assessment
EIAO	Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance
EM&A	Environmental Monitoring and Audit
EPD	Environmental Protection Department
ER	Engineer’s Representatives
ET	Environmental Team
IEC	Independent Environmental Checker
LCSD	Leisure and Cultural Services Department
LCSVO-JV	Leighton China State Van Oord Joint Venture
TDD	Territory Development Department
TSP	Total Suspended Particulates
WMP	Waste Management Plan

Item	Item Description	Date of Application	Permit Status
1	Condition 3.11 – Temporary Noise Barrier for DSD Entrustment Works at Lung Wui Road (Ref. H2189/U2c/ 13523/MP/DC/CKA/ST/ec)	29 April 2005	-
2	Application of Construction Noise Permit for Public Pier West (Ref. H2189/U2c/13144/MP/EY/DS/ST/ec).	12 April 2005	-
3	Application of Construction Noise Permit for Eastern Bored Pile Wall Concreting-Concrete Loading Area at Hung Hing Road Site (Ref. H2189/U2c/13145/MP/EY/DS/ST/ec)	12 April 2005	-

Parameters	Descriptions	Locations		Frequencies		Duration
TSP	24-Hour TSP	2 Locations		Once every 6 days		During dust generating construction works
	1-Hour TSP	2 Locations		Three times in every 6 days		During dust generating construction works
Noise	Leq (30 mins), L₁₀, L_90,	1 Location		Continuous measurements		Two weeks before Construction and During Construction
Water Quality	Dissolved Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended Solids; Turbidity.	14 Locations		3 times a week, Mid-ebb/flood tides		During Marine Works
Waste	On-Site Waste Audit	Active Work Sites		Periodically		During Construction
	On-Site Waste Inspection
Landscape and Visual	Audits to ensure effective implementation of mitigation measures					During Construction
General Site Conditions	Environmental Site Inspection		Works areas and areas affected by works		Periodically	During Construction

Date of Sampling	Sampling Time
2 May 2005	08:30	17:00
4 May 2005	09:52	15:16
6 May 2005	11:10	17:00
9 May 2005	08:30	13:30
11 May 2005	08:30	14:06
13 May 2005	08:30	15:04
16 May 2005	08:30	17:00
18 May 2005	08:53	13:37
20 May 2005	10:09	16:06
23 May 2005	11:46	17:00
25 May 2005	08:30	13:30
27 May 2005	08:30	14:56
30 May 2005	10:37	17:00
1 June 2005	08:30	13:51
3 June 2005	10:07	16:16
6 June 2005	12:00	17:00
8 June 2005	12:00	17:30
10 June 2005	08:30	14:19
13 June 2005	08:30	17:00
15 June 2005	10:46	17:00
17 June 2005	08:35	14:28
20 June 2005	10:41	17:00
22 June 2005	12:00	17:00
24 June 2005	08:30	13:59
27 June 2005	09:33	16:35
29 June 2005	12:00	17:00

2. Environmental Status

2.3 Environmental Document Submission

3.1 Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements

3.2 Environmental Quality Performance Limits

3.3 Event Action Plan

3.4 Implementation of Environmental Measures