Central Reclamation, Phase
III
Quarterly EM&A Report No.
11
(February 2006 through April
2006)
|
Client |
Civil
Engineering Development Department, Hong Kong |
|||||||
|
Project |
Supplementary
Agreement No. 3 to Agreement No. CE 15/94 Design
and Construction for the Minimum Option |
|||||||
|
Report
No. |
3128-REP-231 |
|||||||
|
Date of Issue |
12 May 2006 |
File
Ref. L:\S-proj\CR3\CR3.NEW\3128\ |
||||||
|
Report Title |
Central
Reclamation, Phase III Quarterly
EM&A Report No. 11 February
2006 through April 2006 |
|||||||
|
|
Name |
|
Sign |
|
Date |
|
||
|
Prepared by : |
David
Sanderson, ACL - Senior Consultant |
|
|
|
12 May 2006 |
|
||
|
Reviewed by: |
Susana
Bezy, ACL – ET Leader |
|
|
|
12 May 2006 |
|
||
|
Authorised by : |
Jon
Varndell, ACL – Project Mgr |
|
|
|
12 May 2006 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Distribution |
|
|
||||||
|
Copy No |
Issue to |
Attention |
Corr. Ref. |
|||||
|
1 |
CEDD |
Mr.
Eric K.W. Fung |
3128/M45/200/OC8199/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
2, 3 |
EPD |
Mr.
M W Ho |
3128/M45/200/OC8199/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
4 |
EPD
(LCO) |
Mr.
Allan Hung |
3128/M45/200/OC8199/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
5 |
Leighton-China
State-Van Oord JV |
Mr.
Malcolm Plummer |
3128/M45/200/OC8199/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
6 |
CRIII Sites/PRE |
Mr.
Douglas Miller |
3128/M45/200/OC8199/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
7 |
Independent
Checker (Environment) |
Mr.
Bill Douglas |
3128/M45/200/OC8199/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
8 |
Environmental
Team Leader |
Ms.
Susana Bezy |
3128/M45/200/OC8199/SB/DSA/ec |
|||||
|
9 |
Office
Copy |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
1.2 Project Organisation and Management Structure
2.1 Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
2.2 Environmental Quality Performance Limits
3.1 Implementation of Environmental Measures
3.2 Environmental Monitoring Locations
3.3 Air Quality Monitoring Results
3.4 Noise Quality Monitoring Results
3.5 Water Quality Monitoring Results
3.6 Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status
3.7 Landscape and Visual Audit
4. Environmental
Complaint and Non-Compliance
4.3 Summary of Actions Taken by the Contractor
4.5 Environmental Complaints and Prosecutions
4.6 Record of Environmental Complaints and
Summons & Prosecutions
List of Annexes
Annex A Project Organisation/ Contact Information
Annex B Quality Performance Limits for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex C Event and Action Plans for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex D Monitoring Stations Locations
Annex E Contractor's Works Programme
Annex F Graphical Representation of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Annex G Graphical Representation of Noise Quality Monitoring Results
Annex H Graphical Representation of Water Quality Monitoring Results
Annex I Quarterly Assessment of Construction Impacts on Suspended Solids
List of Tables
Table 2.1 - Summary of Impact EM&A
Requirements...................................................... 2
|
ACL |
Atkins China Limited |
|
CEDD |
Civil Engineering and Development Department |
|
CRIII |
Central Reclamation Phase III |
|
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
|
EM&A |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit |
|
EPD |
Environmental Protection Department |
|
ER |
Engineer’s Representatives |
|
ET |
Environmental Team |
|
IEC |
Independent Environmental Checker |
|
LCSD |
Leisure and Cultural Services Department |
|
LCSVO-JV |
Leighton-China State-Van Oord Joint Venture |
|
TDD |
Territory Development Department |
|
TSP |
Total Suspended Particulates |
Executive Summary
Atkins China Limited (ACL)
has been appointed by TDD (now called the
Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD) after the merger of the
Civil Engineering Department and the Territory Development Department on 1 July
2004) to implement the Environmental Monitoring and Audit (EM&A)
programme that was identified in the EIA Report for the CRIII Project and is
providing Environmental Team services during the duration of the construction
works.
This
is the eleventh quarterly
EM&A Report for the works specified in
Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report.
This report summarises the monitoring results and audit findings of the
EM&A program during the reporting period from 1 February 2006 to 30 April
2006.
Environmental
Monitoring and Audit Progress
Air, Noise and water
quality monitoring were conducted during this quarter.
Weekly environmental site inspections were also conducted during the reporting
quarter.
Exceedances
of Action and Limit Levels
In
February there were no exceedance of the AL or LL for TSP recorded during the reporting
period. However, on the 16 March 2006,
an exceedance of the AL for 1-hr TSP at the City Hall air quality monitoring
station and an exceedance of the LL for 1-hr TSP at both the PLA and City Hall
monitoring stations were recorded. On
25 April 2006, there were two exceedances of the AL for 1-hr TSP and one exceedance of the LL
for 1-hr TSP recorded at PLA air quality monitoring station.
When
the above TSP Exceedances were recorded, the general weather conditions on Hong
Kong Island were very hazy with relatively low visibility. It is noted that Respirable Suspended
Particulates (RSP) and API level recorded at EPD’s air quality monitoring
stations in Central were also high. The
weather and background air quality may have resulted in the exceedance of the
AL and LL rather than the site activities which appear to be controlled,
nevertheless the Contractor was reminded to suppress potential dust generation
during the construction works to minimize possible.
Noise
exceedances were recorded on the 6 and 20 February 2006 at City Hall but were
not attributed to CRIII project works but more likely caused by a combination
of noise sources including peak busy period traffic movements and other
periodic sources that contributed to general background noise in the area.
One
noise exceedances was recorded in March 2006 (i.e. on 3 March 2006) but was
attributed to maintenance works being carried out by the ET on the SLM
containment box. The exceedance at City
Hall was, therefore, not attributed to CRIII project works.
During
April 2006, two noise exceedances were recorded on the 19 and 20 April 2006,
these were attributed to the Tian Hau Festival Activities, which included a
boat moored on the Queens Pier broadcasting festive music. In the early hours of Monday the 24 April,
two exceedances were recorded due to a thunderstorm. Further exceedances were recorded on the 28, 29 and 30 of April
2006. It was reported that a rally was
held in the City Hall area between 28 April and 30 April 2006. The Contractor has also confirmed that there
were no major project activities in the immediate vicinity of the City Hall
during the above-mentioned days. In
general, therefore, the exceedances at City Hall were not attributed to CRIII
project works.
Normal
DO levels were recorded in February 2006 along the seawall, in general, the
majority of the stations showing levels within the AL although on a few
occasions a few exceedances of DO and / or SS were reported. In March 2006 water quality along the
seawall for most of the month was within the AL, however, the number of
exceedances of the AL had increased slightly.
During April 2006, DO levels along the seawall remained mostly within
the AL, however, towards the end of the month DO levels began to fall.
Suspended
Solid concentrations along the seawall were for the most part low during
February 2006, although there were a few spikes which exceeded the AL. In March this pattern was repeated although
the AL and / or LL was exceeded on a few occasions. During April SS levels were also for the most part low, although
one spike in SS levels at one station did exceed the AL.
For
both DO and SS the above-mentioned exceedances were not found to be
attributable to the project works but rather natural variation in water quality
across the site and beyond.
Particular
precautionary mitigation measures implemented during this quarter included:
commencement of Contractors Drainage Management Plan measures for the wet
season, provision/renewal of four silt curtains inside culvert J, provision of
a WetSep Water Treatment Plant, and improvement to Public Pier West Rock Socket
Drilling spoil containment methods, as well as water bowsing to reduce dust
generation.
Complaint
Log
No
new complaints were received during the reporting period.
Notifications of
Summons and Prosecutions
There were no
notifications of summons or prosecutions received during this reporting
quarter.
Site
Inspection and Audit
Weekly environmental site inspections were carried
out during this quarter. Any minor
deficiencies noted during the site inspections were rectified by the Contractor
upon receipt of notification.
The Territory
Development Department (TDD) (now called the Civil Engineering and Development
Department (CEDD) after the merger of the Civil Engineering Department and the
Territory Development Department on 1 July 2004) of the Hong Kong Special
Administrative Region (HKSAR) is constructing the Central Reclamation Phase III
project (CRIII).
The Main Works
Contract HK 12/02 for CRIII commenced on 28 February 2003. Leighton China State
Van Oord Joint Venture (LCSVO-JV) was awarded the Contract No. HK 12/02 for the
construction of the CRIII Engineering Works.
The main construction works that were identified in the EIA Report for
the Project, requiring environmental monitoring and audit, have commenced.
The Contractor's
works programme for the quarter is provided in Annex E.
Atkins
China Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by TDD (now called CEDD), the
employer, to undertake the environmental monitoring and audit work for the
project. ACL is also the Resident
Engineers for the project and LCSVO-JV is the main contractor. An Independent Environmental Checker (IEC)
has been employed to audit the EM&A programme. The contacts of key management are provided in Annex
A.
The
works undertaken in the project area requiring environmental monitoring and
audit as identified in the EIA Report (not including Chai Wan Basin) during the
quarter included:
The EM&A programme
requires environmental monitoring for air quality, noise, water quality, waste
management and landscape and visual aspects as specified in the CRIII Project
EIA. The EM&A requirements for each
issue area are described in subsequent sections including:
·
All required
monitoring parameters;
·
Action and
Limit Levels; and
·
Event-Action
Plans.
A summary of impact
EM&A requirements is presented in Table 2-1.
|
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Duration |
||
|
TSP |
24-Hour TSP |
2 Locations |
Once every 6 days |
During dust
generating construction works |
||
|
1-Hour TSP |
2 Locations |
Three times in
every 6 days |
During dust
generating construction works |
|||
|
Noise |
Leq (30 mins), L10, L90, |
1 Location |
Continuous
measurements |
Two weeks before
Construction and During Construction |
||
|
Water Quality |
Dissolved Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended Solids; Turbidity. |
14 Locations |
3 times a week,
Mid-ebb/flood tides |
During Marine
Works and for 4 weeks after completion of Marine Works |
||
|
Waste |
On-Site Waste
Audit |
Active Work Sites |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
||
|
On-Site Waste
Inspection |
||||||
|
Landscape and
Visual |
Audits to ensure
effective implementation of mitigation measures |
During Construction |
||||
|
General Site
Conditions |
Environmental Site
Inspection |
Works areas and
areas affected by works |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
||
Environmental Quality
Performance Limits for air, noise and water quality have been established as
part of the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex B.
Event Action Plans for air,
noise and water quality have been developed as part of the Baseline Monitoring
Report and are provided in Annex C.
The Contractor has
implemented relevant mitigation measures listed in the EIA Report, EM&A
Manual and Further Environmental Permit.
Drawings showing the
project area and locations of the monitoring stations are provided in Annex
D.
Air quality monitoring
commenced on 21 April 2005 at PLA Barracks in Central. Monitoring
was not conducted at the City Hall monitoring station until March 2006 because
exterior renovation works were undertaken by City Hall at the elevated walkway
area. The graphical plot of air
quality monitoring results is provided in Annex F.
The
original noise meter was returned to station in mid March 2006 after repair by
the manufacturer in Denmark. However,
readings in late March and early April were partially lost due to a combination
of power and software failure.
The graphical plot of noise
monitoring results for this quarter is provided in Annex G.
The graphical plot of water
quality monitoring results for this quarter is provided in Annex H.
Solid and liquid waste
management was implemented according to the Waste Management Plan during the
reporting quarter.
As
the works undertaken during the reporting quarter were mainly related to
reclamation, buildings and infrastructure works, the landscape and visual
impacts are considered to be minimal.
In
February there were No exceedance of the AL or LL for TSP recorded during the
reporting period. However, on the 16
March 2006, an exceedance of the AL for 1-hr TSP at the City Hall air quality
monitoring station and an exceedance of the LL for 1-hr TSP at both the PLA and
City Hall monitoring stations were recorded.
On 25 April 2006, there were two exceedances of the AL for 1-hr TSP and one
exceedance of the LL for 1-hr TSP recorded at PLA air quality monitoring
station.
When
the above TSP Exceedances were recorded, the general weather conditions on Hong
Kong Island were very hazy with relatively low visibility. It is noted that Respirable Suspended
Particulates (RSP) and API level recorded at EPD’s air quality monitoring
stations in Central were also high. The
weather and background air quality may have resulted in the exceedance of the
AL and LL rather than the site activities which appear to be controlled,
nevertheless the Contractor was reminded to suppress potential dust generation
during the construction works to minimize possible.
Noise
exceedances were recorded on the 6 and 20 February 2006 at City Hall but were
not attributed to CRIII project works but more likely caused by a combination
of noise sources including peak busy period traffic movements and other
periodic sources that contributed to general background noise in the area.
One
noise exceedances was recorded in March 2006 (i.e. on 3 March 2006) but was
attributed to maintenance works being carried out by the ET on the SLM
containment box. The exceedance at City
Hall was, therefore, not attributed to CRIII project works.
During
April 2006, two noise exceedances were recorded on the 19 and 20 April 2006,
these were attributed to the Tian Hau Festival Activities, which included a
boat moored on the Queens Pier broadcasting festive music. In the early hours of Monday the 24 April,
two exceedances were recorded due to a thunderstorm. Further exceedances were recorded on the 28, 29 and 30 of
April. It was reported that a rally was
held in the City Hall area between 28th April 2006 and 30th April 2006. The Contractor has also confirmed that there
were no major project activities in the immediate vicinity of the City Hall
during the above-mentioned days. In
general, therefore, the exceedances at City Hall were not attributed to CRIII
project works.
DO
levels recorded during February, March and April were for the most part in
compliance with the AL. However, some
exceedances of the AL were recorded and these are detailed below.
SS
concentrations along the seawall were for the most part low during February,
March and April 2006. However, a few
exceedances of the AL and / or LL were recorded in February, March and April 2006, these are detailed
below:
|
Date |
Tide |
Parameter |
Exceedance |
Station |
|
17 Feb. 06 |
Mid-Flood |
DO |
AL |
M5 |
|
20 Feb. 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M4A |
|
22 Feb. 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M4A |
|
22 Feb. 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
AL |
M5 |
|
1 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M2, M3, M4A, M5, M6 and
M11 |
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
AL |
M4A |
|
|
1 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
LL |
M5 |
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
AL |
M11 |
|
|
3 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M4A |
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
LL |
M12 |
|
|
6 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M4A |
|
8 March 06 |
Mid-Flood |
DO |
AL |
M2 |
|
13 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M4A and M12 |
|
15 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M4A |
|
17 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M4A |
|
22 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M2, M3, M4A, and M5 |
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
AL |
M2, M6 and M12 |
|
|
27 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
LL |
M3 and M4A |
|
29 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
AL&LL |
M3 and M4A respectively |
|
31 March 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M3 |
|
5 April 06 |
Mid-Flood |
DO |
AL |
M4A, and M5 |
|
10 April 06 |
Mid-Flood |
DO |
AL |
M2, M4 and M6 |
|
10 April 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
AL |
M10 |
|
17 April 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M2, M3, M4A, M5 and M6 |
|
19 April 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M2, M3, M4, M5, M6 and M12 |
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
AL |
M3 and M5 |
|
|
21 April 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M3 |
|
24 April 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M3, M4A, M5, M6 and M12 |
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
AL |
M3, M4A, M5, M6 and M12 |
|
|
28 April 06 |
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
AL |
M3, M5 and M12 |
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
AL |
M2, M3, M4A, M5 and M12 |
The exceedances observed were not directly attributable to project works
as no marine works that would greatly disturb the seabed were being carried out
during the reporting period and they are, therefore, attributed to natural
variation in ambient conditions along the seafront and not project works.
A statistical analysis (Annex
I) of the suspended solids monitoring results found that the quarterly
mean is significantly less than 1.3 times of the ambient mean recorded during
the baseline period. This
indicates that the Project construction works generally did not cause adverse
impacts during the reporting period with respect to the baseline condition.
No environmental
no-compliances were reported in the quarter.
The Contractor has
implemented the following measures to prevent air, and water impacts:
·
Contractor has commenced implementation of their Drainage Management
Plan to Control Site Run-off for the wet season – actions completed and
underway include: repair and improvement of existing bunds/sandbags on the edge
of the reclamation; installation of additional bunds; compaction of soil
surface and pathing where possible to prevent erosion, creation of drainage
channels and soak pits.
·
Culvert J, IRAE - Provision of four silt curtains to contain seepage of
silty water from the adjacent works on the New Culvert J extension;
·
Provision a single WetSep flocculation based water treatment
plant and additional settlement tanks to remove suspended solids from discharge
waters;
·
Provision of catch pits to collect spill over from wheel washing
facilities; increased frequency of cleaning of catch-pits;
·
Rock Socket Drilling at Public Pier West – Contractor contained
surrounding bore area with silt curtains, provision of tarpaulin sheets and
sand bags on deck surface to contain bore sediments. Installed long tarpaulin curtain on drill rigging to contain
splashes.
·
Water bowsing of haul roads and other areas of the site and covering of
stock piles.
No
environmental enquiries were received during the reporting quarter.
No
environmental complaints were received or prosecutions made during the quarter.
N/A
for this quarter.
During environmental site inspections conducted during the reporting
quarter, no non-compliances were noted and no prosecutions were received.
Generally air quality measurements at the PLA and City Hall Stations
were within the AL for TSP, although some exceedances were recorded in March
and April 2006, these were not attributed to project works but rather
regionally poor air quality which does indicate that the project was not having
an adverse impact on local air quality.
Noise levels at the City
Hall Station were generally below the exceedance level, although some
exceedances were recorded in February, March and April 2006, these were not
attributed to project works but rather various individual events including
general rush hour traffic noise, ET maintenance work on the noise meter
housing, a thunderstorm and a nearby rally which does indicate that the project
was not having an adverse noise impact.
Water quality was generally good over the
monitoring period, although some exceedances were observed at the Sea Water
Intake Station and one exceedance at a Marine Based Station, these were not attributed
to project works but rather more reflective of general water quality
conditions.