Central Reclamation,
Phase III
Quarterly EM&A
Report No. 19
(February 2008 through
April 2008)
1.2 Project Organisation and Management Structure
2.1 Summary of Impact
EM&A Requirements
2.2 Environmental Quality
Performance Limits
3.1 Implementation of
Environmental Measures
3.2 Environmental
Monitoring Locations
3.3 Air Quality Monitoring
Results
3.4 Noise Quality
Monitoring Results
3.5 Water Quality
Monitoring Results
3.6 Solid and Liquid Waste
Management Status
3.7 Landscape and Visual
Audit
4. Environmental Complaint and Non-Compliance
4.3 Summary of Actions
Taken by the Contractor
4.5 Environmental
Complaints and Prosecutions
4.6 Record of
Environmental Complaints and Summons & Prosecutions
List of Annexes
Annex A Project Organisation/ Contact Information
Annex B Quality Performance Limits for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex C Event and Action Plans for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex D Monitoring Stations Locations
Annex E Contractor's Works Programme
Annex F Graphical Representation of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Annex G Graphical Representation of Noise Quality Monitoring Results
Annex H Graphical Representation of Water Quality Monitoring Results
Annex I Quarterly Assessment of Construction Impacts on Suspended Solids
List of Tables
Table 2.1 - Summary of Impact EM&A
Requirements
|
ACL |
Atkins China Limited |
|
|
Action Level |
|
CEDD |
Civil Engineering and Development Department |
|
CRIII |
Central Reclamation Phase III |
|
DO |
Dissolved Oxygen |
|
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
|
EIAO |
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance |
|
EM&A |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit |
|
EPD |
Environmental Protection Department |
|
ER |
Engineer’s Representatives |
|
ET |
Environmental Team |
|
IEC |
Independent Environmental Checker |
|
LCSD |
Leisure and Cultural Services Department |
|
LCSVO-JV |
|
|
LL |
Limit Level |
|
PLA |
People's Liberation Army Forces |
|
TDD |
Territory Development Department |
|
TSP |
Total Suspended Particulates |
|
SS |
Suspended Solids |
|
WMP |
Waste Management Plan |
Executive Summary
The Central Reclamation Phase III (CRIII) Works, Contract No. HK 12/02,
was awarded to Leighton China State Van Oord Joint Venture (LCSVO-JV) by the Civil
Engineering and Development Department (CEDD). (Previously called the Territory
Development Department before merger with the Civil Engineering Department on
The works under the Contract HK 12/02 commenced on
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual for
the CRIII Project.
This is the 19th quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress
Air quality,
noise and water quality monitoring were conducted during this quarter. Weekly environmental site inspections were
also conducted during this reporting quarter.
Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
One exceedance of noise was recorded at the City
Hall monitoring station during the reporting period. This exceedance could have
been attributed to the emergency filling works at the collapsed seawall at
former Queen’s Pier.
Exceedances of water quality were recorded on 22
sampling days in this reporting quarter.
Exceedances of the Action Limit for DO were recorded on 14 of the
sampling days. Exceedances of the Action
Limit for SS were recorded on 13 of the sampling days. Exceedances of the Limit
Level for SS were recorded on 7 of the sampling days. Two SS exceedances (3rd and 14th April) of
Water Quality Monitoring in accordance with EM&A Manual and four SS
exceedances (3rd ,5th, 11th and 14th April)
of Additional Water Quality Monitoring for “Type A fill” Filling Works
conducted by the Contractor were considered potentially attributable to project
works. The follow-up reports of the exceedances (No.665, 666, 668, 676, 679and
680) were issued to describe the follow-up action. A meeting was called on
Complaint Log
There were no complaints received in relation to environment impact
during this reporting quarter.
Notifications
of Summons and Prosecutions
There were
no notifications of summons or prosecutions received during this reporting
quarter.
Site Inspection and Audit
Weekly environmental site inspections were carried out during this
quarter. Minor deficiencies noted during
the site inspections were rectified by the Contractor upon receipt of
notification.
The Main Works Contract HK 12/02 for CRIII commenced on
This is the 18th quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
The
Contractor's works programme for the quarter is provided in Annex
E.
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual and
required under Clause 4 of the Variation
of Future Environmental Permit (No. EP-01/122/2003/A) issued to Leighton-China
State-Van Oord Joint Venture in December 2007 for the CRIII Project. An Independent Environmental Checker (IEC) has
been employed to audit the EM&A programme.
The CRIII Project Organisation is shown in Annex A.
The works undertaken in the project area
requiring environmental monitoring and audit as identified in the EIA Report
(not including
·
Rockfilling and geotextile layer behind the seawall
in FRAW;
·
Type A and sand filling in FRAW;
·
Placement of seawall blocks in FRAE
·
Rockfilling behind the seawalls in FRAE;
·
Pile cap construction for Public Pier East (Pier
No.10);
·
Diaphragm wall and barrette excavation for the MTRC
40 metre EOT;
·
Excavation of temporary drainage channel at the
former Star Ferry;
·
Remedial and outstanding works at and around Piers
7 & 8, Public Pier West and the CTB;
·
Remedial and outstanding works at MYS Footbridge;
·
General filing works above +2.5 mPD in IRAE;
·
Construction of storm and foul drainage in
hinterlands for Road P2, Road D7, Road D8 and Road D9 and adjacent to the GPO;
·
Reinstatement of existing Culvert J;
·
Structural works for Road P2 Underpass;
·
Roadworks
and utilities installations along
·
Pre-drilling
and temporary works for Culvert F extension;
·
Structural
works for Culvert K extension – bays 1 to 3;
·
Modification
works to cooling main connections.
The EM&A
programme requires environmental monitoring for air quality, noise, waster
quality, waste management and landscape and visual aspects as specified in the
CRIII Project EIA. The EM&A
requirements for each issue area are described in subsequent sections
including:
·
All required monitoring parameters;
·
Action and Limit Levels; and
·
Event-Action Plans.
A summary of
impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 2-1.
Table 2.1 - Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
|
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Duration |
|
TSP |
24-Hour TSP |
2 Locations |
Once every 6 days |
During dust generating construction works |
|
1-Hour TSP |
2 Locations |
Three times in every 6 days |
During dust generating construction works |
|
|
Noise |
Leq (30 mins), L10, L90, |
1 Location |
Continuous measurements |
Two weeks before Construction and During Construction |
|
Water Quality |
Dissolved Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended Solids; Turbidity. |
16 Locations |
3 times a week, Mid-ebb/flood tides |
During Marine Works and for 4 weeks after completion of
Marine Works |
|
Waste |
On-Site Waste Audit |
Active Work Sites |
Periodically |
During Construction |
|
On-Site Waste Inspection |
||||
|
Landscape and Visual |
Audits to ensure effective implementation of
mitigation measures |
During Construction |
||
|
General Site Conditions |
Environmental Site Inspection |
Works areas and areas affected by works |
Periodically |
During Construction |
Additional
impact water quality monitoring is required for the marine filling works using
“Type A Fill” at FRAW as per Condition 3.3 of EP No. EP-01/122/2003/A. Monitoring parameters include SS, in situ
measurements for DO, temperature, turbidity and salinity at 9 monitoring
stations. The additional water quality
monitoring is conducted by the Contractor (LCSVO-JV) and the monitoring results
are reported in the EM&A monthly report in accordance with the Additional
Water Quality Monitoring Programme certified by the ET and verified by the IEC.
Environmental Quality
Performance Limits for air quality, noise and water quality have been
established as part of the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex
B.
Event Action
Plans for air quality, noise and water quality have been developed as part of
the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex C.
The Contractor
has implemented relevant mitigation measures listed in the EIA Report, EM&A
Manual and Further Environmental Permit.
Drawings showing
the project area and locations of the monitoring stations are provided in Annex
D.
The graphical
plot of air quality monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided
in Annex F. Access to the PLA Barracks monitoring station
was denied on
The graphical
plot of noise monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex
G.
The graphical
plot of water quality monitoring results and Additional water quality monitoring for the marine filling works using
“Type A Fill” at FRAW for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex
H.
Solid and liquid
waste management was implemented according to the Waste Management Plan during
this reporting quarter.
As the works undertaken during this reporting quarter were mainly
related to reclamation, buildings and infrastructure works, the landscape and
visual impacts are considered to be minimal.
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
One noise exceedance was recorded at the City Hall
monitoring station on
Exceedances of water quality were recorded on 23 sampling days in this reporting quarter. Exceedances of the Action Level for DO were recorded on 14 of the sampling days. Exceedances of the Action Level for SS were recorded on 13 of the sampling days. Exceedances of the Limit Level for SS were recorded on 7 of the sampling days. Two SS exceedances (3rd and 14th April) of Water Quality Monitoring in accordance with EM&A Manual and four SS exceedances (3rd ,5th, 11th and 14th April) of Additional Water Quality Monitoring for “Type A fill” Filling Works conducted by the Contractor were considered potentially attributable to project works. Monitoring was repeated on 15th, 17th and 22nd April 2008 following the Event and Action Plan for water quality. The follow-up reports of the exceedances (No.665, 666, 668, 676, 679and 680) were issued to describe the follow-up action. The water quality exceedances during this reporting quarter is summarised in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 - Summary Water Quality Exceedances from February 2008 to April 2008
|
Date |
Tide |
Parameter |
Exceedance |
Station |
|
Water Quality Monitoring in Accordance with EM&A Manual |
||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M5B |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M11 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M3_M5A and M5B |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M3_M5A,M5B and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M1A and M3_M5A |
|
LL |
M5B |
|||
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M6 |
|
|
LL |
M3_M5A, M5B and M12 |
|||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A and M4B |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M3_M5A |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M4B |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M1A and M11 |
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M1A, M5B and M11 |
|
|
LL |
M3_M5A, M6 and M12 |
|||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M6 and M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M1A and M11 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M1A |
|
LL |
M3_M5A |
|||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M3_M5A and M5B |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6 and M11 |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
M1A, M3_M5A, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M1A, M3_M5A and M5B |
|
LL |
M6 and M12 |
|||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M1A, M11 and M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M3_M5A, M5B, M6 and M11 |
|
|
LL |
M12 |
|||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A,M3_M5A, M4B, M6 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
LL |
M1A, M11 and M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M1A, M6 and M11 |
|
|
|
LL |
M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M3_M5A, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
Additional Water Quality Monitoring for “Type A fill” Filling Works Conducted
by the Contractor |
||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
Afternoon
session |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1 |
|
|
Mid-ebb
& Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1 |
|
|
Mid-ebb
& Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined
marine impact monitoring station (AM1 |
A statistical
analysis (presented in Annex I) of the suspended solids
monitoring results found that the quarterly mean is significantly less than 1.3
times of the ambient mean recorded during the baseline period. This indicates that the Project construction
works did not cause adverse impacts during the reporting period with respect to
the baseline condition.
One
non-compliance with regard to site environmental audit was recorded on
The
Contractor’s representative was reminded of this inappropriate operation and
the silt curtains were then closed until it was time for the barge to pass
through.
Discoloration of the water around the seawall gap and up to the first
buoy location was seen. This may have
caused by the inappropriate opening and closing operation of the silt curtains.
An environmental meeting was held on
The
Contractor has implemented the following measures to prevent air and water
quality impacts:
·
Contractor has implemented their Drainage
Management Plan to Control Site Run-off for the wet season – actions completed and
underway include: repair and improvement of existing bunds/sandbags on the edge
of the reclamation; installation of additional bunds; compaction of soil
surface and pathing where possible to prevent erosion, creation of drainage
channels and soak pits.
·
Provision a single WetSep flocculation based
water treatment plant and additional settlement tanks to remove suspended
solids from discharge waters;
·
Provision of catch pits to collect spill over from
wheel washing facilities; increased frequency of cleaning of catch-pits;
·
Water browsing of haul roads and other areas of the
site and covering of stockpiles.
No environmental enquiries were received during this reporting quarter.
No environmental complaints were received
during this reporting quarter.
There was no record of environmental complaints during this reporting
quarter.
There
were no notifications of summons and prosecutions during this reporting
quarter.
During the environmental site inspections conducted within this
reporting quarter, one non-compliances were noted and no prosecutions were
received during this reporting quarter.
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
One exceedance of noise was recorded at the City Hall monitoring station during the reporting period. This exceedance could have been attributed to the emergency filling works at the collapsed seawall at former Queen’s Pier.
Exceedances
of water quality were recorded on 23 sampling days in this reporting
quarter. Exceedances of the Action Limit
for DO were recorded on 14 of the sampling days. Exceedances of the Action Limit for SS were
recorded on 13 of the sampling days. Exceedances of the Limit Level for SS were
recorded on 7 of the sampling days. Two SS exceedances (3rd and 14th
April) of Water Quality Monitoring in accordance with EM&A Manual and four
SS exceedances (3rd ,5th, 11th and 14th
April) of Additional Water Quality Monitoring for “Type A fill” Filling Works
conducted by the Contractor were considered potentially attributable to project
works. Monitoring was repeated on 15th, 17th
and 22nd April 2008 following the Event and Action Plan for water
quality. The follow-up reports of the exceedances (No.665, 666, 668, 676, 679and
680) were issued to describe the follow-up action.
One environmental non-conformance was recorded on