Central Reclamation,
Phase III
Quarterly EM&A
Report No. 20
(May 2008 through July
2008)
1.2 Project Organisation and Management Structure
2.1 Summary of Impact
EM&A Requirements
2.2 Environmental Quality
Performance Limits
3.1 Implementation of
Environmental Measures
3.2 Environmental
Monitoring Locations
3.3 Air Quality Monitoring
Results
3.4 Noise Quality
Monitoring Results
3.5 Water Quality
Monitoring Results
3.6 Solid and Liquid Waste
Management Status
3.7 Landscape and Visual
Audit
4. Environmental Complaint and Non-Compliance
4.3 Summary of Actions
Taken by the Contractor
4.5 Environmental
Complaints and Prosecutions
4.6 Record of
Environmental Complaints and Summons & Prosecutions
List of Annexes
Annex A Project Organisation/ Contact Information
Annex B Quality Performance Limits for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex C Event and Action Plans for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex D Monitoring Stations Locations
Annex E Contractor's Works Programme
Annex F Graphical Representation of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Annex G Graphical Representation of Noise Quality Monitoring Results
Annex H Graphical Representation of Water Quality Monitoring Results
Annex I Quarterly Assessment of Construction Impacts on Suspended Solids
List of Tables
Table 2.1 - Summary of Impact EM&A
Requirements
Abbreviations & Acronyms
|
ACL |
Atkins China Limited |
|
|
Action Level |
|
CEDD |
Civil Engineering and Development Department |
|
CRIII |
Central Reclamation Phase III |
|
DO |
Dissolved Oxygen |
|
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
|
EIAO |
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance |
|
EM&A |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit |
|
EPD |
Environmental Protection Department |
|
ER |
Engineer’s Representatives |
|
ET |
Environmental Team |
|
IEC |
Independent Environmental Checker |
|
LCSD |
Leisure and Cultural Services Department |
|
LCSVO-JV |
|
|
LL |
Limit Level |
|
PLA |
People's Liberation Army Forces |
|
TDD |
Territory Development Department |
|
TSP |
Total Suspended Particulates |
|
SS |
Suspended Solids |
|
WMP |
Waste Management Plan |
Executive Summary
The Central Reclamation Phase III (CRIII) Works, Contract No. HK 12/02,
was awarded to Leighton China State Van Oord Joint Venture (LCSVO-JV) by the
Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD). (Previously called the
Territory Development Department before merger with the Civil Engineering
Department on
The works under the Contract HK 12/02 commenced on
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual for
the CRIII Project.
This is the 20th quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress
Air quality,
noise and water quality monitoring were conducted during this quarter. Weekly environmental site inspections were
also conducted during this reporting quarter.
Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
Two exceedances of noise were recorded at the City
Hall monitoring station on
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 35 sampling days in this
reporting quarter. The exceedances have
been investigated and the exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS occurred on
8 sampling days (5th, 13th, 17th, 19th,
21st and 23rd May, 2nd and 3rd June
2008) were considered to be potentially attributed to the Project as well as
other external factors. All exceedances of Action/Limit Level
for DO were considered to have been not related to the Project works.
Complaint Log
There were no complaints received in relation to environment impact
during this reporting quarter.
Notifications
of Summons and Prosecutions
There were
no notifications of summons or prosecutions received during this reporting
quarter.
Site Inspection and Audit
Weekly environmental site inspections were carried out during this
quarter. Minor deficiencies noted during
the site inspections were rectified by the Contractor upon receipt of
notification. The observation and finding as below:
The silt curtain at the
small seawall gap (on the side facing
Fuel drums without drip tray were found near mobile crane at FRAW. The
Contractor was reminded to provide drip tray for fuel drums if they need to be
temporarily stored in the working areas.
Fuel drums were observed stored in the chemical storage area during thee
site inspection on
Large amount of scum was
observed floating in Culvert J (especially near the upstream) during the site
inspection. Discharge from the site to
Culvert J was clear as seen and no specific scummy condition of the discharge
from the site was observed thus it was considered not related to the
Project. A follow-up inspection was
undertaken on
One end of silt curtains at the
South-East corner of FRAE was seen to be slackening off. Some muddy water was
seen to diffuse out from the gap between silt curtain and seawall. The
Contractor made the silt curtain tight before the end of site inspection. The
Contractor was reminded to check the silt curtain regularly and ensure work
well. The Contractor has installed an additional silt curtain at the South-East
Corner of FRAE to prevent the dispersal of suspended solids.
A part of access roads in the site area (near Queens Pier’) was observed
dry. The Contractor was reminded to keep watering to prevent the dust emission
from the road. No dusty roads were seen during the inspection on
The Main Works Contract HK 12/02 for CRIII commenced on
This is the 20th quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
The
Contractor's works programme for the quarter is provided in Annex
E.
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual and
required under Clause 4 of the Variation
of Further Environmental Permit (No. EP-01/122/2003/A) issued to Leighton-China
State-Van Oord Joint Venture in December 2007 for the CRIII
Project. A variation of the Further Environmental Permit for the
Project (EP-01/122/2003/B) was granted on
The works undertaken in the project area
requiring environmental monitoring and audit as identified in the EIA Report
(not including
·
Rockfilling and geotextile layer behind the seawall
in FRAW;
·
Type A filling in FRAW;
·
Deep Compaction in FRAW
·
Rockfilling behind the seawalls in FRAE;
·
Structural works for Public Pier East (Pier No.10);
·
Insitu works for Pumping Stations P6.1 and P7.1
·
Diaphragm wall and barrette excavation and
construction for the MTRC 40 metre EOT;
·
Excavation of temporary drainage channel at the
former Star Ferry;
·
Remedial and outstanding works at and around Piers
7 & 8, Public Pier West and the CTB;
·
Remedial and outstanding works at MYS Footbridge;
·
General filing works above +2.5 mPD in IRAE;
·
Construction of storm and foul drainage and gullies
in hinterlands for Road P2, Road D7, Road D8 and Road D9 and adjacent to the
GPO;
·
Structural works, sheet-piling and excavation for
Road P2 Underpass;
·
Roadworks
along
·
Structural
works for Culvert K extension – bays 2 to 3;
·
Sheet-piling
and excavation for Culvert K extension – bays 4 to 6; and
·
Modification
works to cooling main connections.
The EM&A
programme requires environmental monitoring for air quality, noise, waster
quality, waste management and landscape and visual aspects as specified in the
CRIII Project EIA. The EM&A
requirements for each issue area are described in subsequent sections including:
·
All required monitoring parameters;
·
Action and Limit Levels; and
·
Event-Action Plans.
A summary of
impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 2-1.
Table 2.1
- Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
|
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Duration |
|
TSP |
24-Hour
TSP |
2 Locations |
Once
every 6 days |
During
dust generating construction works |
|
1-Hour
TSP |
2
Locations |
Three
times in every 6 days |
During
dust generating construction works |
|
|
Noise |
Leq (30 mins), L10, L90, |
1
Location |
Continuous
measurements |
Two weeks
before Construction and During Construction |
|
Water
Quality |
Dissolved
Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended
Solids; Turbidity. |
16
Locations |
3
times a week, Mid-ebb/flood tides |
During
Marine Works and for 4 weeks after completion of Marine Works |
|
Waste |
On-Site
Waste Audit |
Active
Work Sites |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
|
On-Site
Waste Inspection |
||||
|
Landscape
and Visual |
Audits
to ensure effective implementation of mitigation measures |
During
Construction |
||
|
General
Site Conditions |
Environmental
Site Inspection |
Works
areas and areas affected by works |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
Additional impact water quality monitoring is required for the marine filling works using “Type A Fill” at FRAW as per Condition 3.3 of EP No. EP-01/122/2003/A, No. EP-01/122/2003/B and No. EP-01/122/2003/C. Monitoring parameters include SS, in situ measurements for DO, temperature, turbidity and salinity at 9, 8, and 4 monitoring stations, respectively. The additional water quality monitoring is conducted by the Contractor and the monitoring results are reported in the EM&A monthly report in accordance with the Additional Water Quality Monitoring Programme certified by the ET and verified by the IEC.
Environmental
Quality Performance Limits for air quality, noise and water quality have been
established as part of the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex
B.
Event Action Plans
for air quality, noise and water quality have been developed as part of the
Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex C.
The Contractor has
implemented relevant mitigation measures listed in the EIA Report, EM&A
Manual and Further Environmental Permit.
Drawings showing
the project area and locations of the monitoring stations are provided in Annex
D.
The graphical
plot of air quality monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided
in Annex F. The
measurement was cancelled due to heavy rain on
The graphical
plot of noise monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex
G. Measurements between 24th June and
The graphical
plot of water quality monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided
in Annex H.
Solid and liquid
waste management was implemented according to the Waste Management Plan during
this reporting quarter.
As the works undertaken during this reporting quarter were mainly
related to reclamation, buildings and infrastructure works, the landscape and
visual impacts are considered to be minimal.
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
Two exceedances of noise were recorded at the City
Hall monitoring station on
Exceedances of water quality were recorded on 35 sampling days in this reporting quarter. Exceedances of the Action/Limit Level for DO were recorded on 29 of the sampling days and none were considered to be related to the Project works. Exceedances of the Action Level for SS were recorded on 7 of the sampling days. Exceedances of the Limit Level for SS were recorded on 3 of the sampling days. Exceedances of the Action and Limit Level for SS of sampling conducted by the Contractor were recorded on 13 of the sampling days. The exceedances have been investigated and the exceedances of 8 sampling days (5th, 13th, 17th, 19th, 21st and 23rd May, 2nd and 3rd June 2008) were considered to be potentially attributed to the project as well as other external factors. The water quality exceedances during this reporting quarter is summarised in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 - Summary Water Quality Exceedances
from May 2008 to July April 2008
|
Date |
Tide |
Parameter |
Exceedance |
Station |
|
Water Quality Monitoring in Accordance with EM&A Manual |
||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M1A, M6, M8, M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M3_M5A, M5B and M6 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
M1A and M11 |
|
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M1A, M3_M5A and M11 |
|
|
LL |
M6 and M12 |
|||
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M3_M5AA, M5B and M10 |
|
|
LL |
M1A, M6, M11 and M12 |
|||
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
M11 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M1A |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6 and
M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M6A |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M1A, M3_M5A and M5B |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B and M5B |
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M1A |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A and M11 |
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
M6 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B and
M11 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M3_M5A, M5B, M6, M11 and
M12 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M3_M5A, M5B and M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M4B, M10 and M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M10(bottom depth) |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M4B |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M8(bottom depth) and M10(bottom
depth) |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M4B, M8(bottom depth),
M10(bottom depth) |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M8 and M10(bottom depth) |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M5B, M6, M11 and
M12 |
|
|
DO |
LL |
M1A and M4B |
||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B and M5B |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M4B, M5B and M11 |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M10(B), M11and
M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M6, M11 and
M12 |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M6,
M10(S&M), M11 and
M12 |
|
|
LL |
M5B |
|||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M8(B), M11 and
M12 |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M3_M5A, M8(S/M) |
|
LL |
M8(B) and M10(B) |
|||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M6, M8(B), M10(B), M11 and
M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M4B,and M8(S&M) |
|
LL |
M8(B) and M10(B) |
|||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M4B and M10(B) |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M8(B) and M10(B) |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M4B |
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
Date |
Tide |
Parameter |
Exceedance |
Station |
|
Additional Water Quality Monitoring for “Type A fill” Filling Works
Conducted by the Contractor |
||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-ebb & Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-ebb & Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-ebb & Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-ebb & Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-ebb & Mid-flood |
SS |
|
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Afternoon Session & |
SS |
|
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
Mid-flood |
||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Afternoon Session |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact
monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
|
|
Mid-ebb & Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact monitoring
station (AM1-AM3) |
A statistical
analysis (presented in Annex I) of the suspended solids
monitoring results found that the quarterly mean is significantly less than 1.3
times of the ambient mean recorded during the baseline period. This indicates that the Project construction
works did not cause adverse impacts during the reporting period with respect to
the baseline condition.
No non-compliance with regard to site environmental audit was recorded
during the reporting period.
The
Contractor has implemented the following measures to prevent air and water
quality impacts:
·
Contractor has implemented their Drainage Management
Plan to Control Site Run-off for the wet season – actions completed and
underway include: repair and improvement of existing bunds/sandbags on the edge
of the reclamation; installation of additional bunds; compaction of soil
surface and pathing where possible to prevent erosion, creation of drainage
channels and soak pits.
·
Provision a single WetSep flocculation based
water treatment plant and additional settlement tanks to remove suspended
solids from discharge waters;
·
Provision of catch pits to collect spill over from
wheel washing facilities; increased frequency of cleaning of catch-pits;
·
Water browsing of haul roads and other areas of the
site and covering of stockpiles.
No environmental enquiries were received during this reporting quarter.
No environmental complaints were received
during this reporting quarter.
There was no record of environmental complaints during this reporting
quarter.
There
were no notifications of summons and prosecutions during this reporting
quarter.
During the environmental site inspections conducted within this
reporting quarter, no non-compliances were noted and no prosecutions were
received during this reporting quarter.
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
Two exceedances of noise were recorded at the City
Hall monitoring station on
Water
quality exceedances were recorded on 35 sampling days in this reporting
quarter. The exceedances have been
investigated and the exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS occurred on 8
sampling days (5th, 13th, 17th, 19th,
21st and 23rd May, 2nd and 3rd June 2008) were considered
to be potentially attributed to the project as well as other external
factors. All exceedances of Action/Limit
Level for DO were considered to have been not related to the Project works.