Central Reclamation,
Phase III
Quarterly EM&A
Report No. 21
(August 2008 through
October 2008)
1.2 Project Organisation and Management Structure
2.1 Summary of Impact
EM&A Requirements
2.2 Environmental Quality
Performance Limits
3.1 Implementation of
Environmental Measures
3.2 Environmental
Monitoring Locations
3.3 Air Quality Monitoring
Results
3.4 Noise Quality
Monitoring Results
3.5 Water Quality
Monitoring Results
3.6 Solid and Liquid Waste
Management Status
3.7 Landscape and Visual
Audit
4. Environmental Complaint and Non-Compliance
4.3 Summary of Actions
Taken by the Contractor
4.5 Environmental
Complaints and Prosecutions
4.6 Record of
Environmental Complaints and Summons & Prosecutions
List of Annexes
Annex
A Project
Organisation/ Contact Information
Annex
B Quality Performance
Limits for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex
C Event and Action Plans
for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex
D Monitoring Stations
Locations
Annex
E Contractor's Works
Programme
Annex
F Graphical
Representation of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
G Graphical
Representation of Noise Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
H Graphical
Representation of Water Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
I Quarterly Assessment
of Construction Impacts on Suspended Solids
List of Tables
Table 2.1 - Summary of Impact EM&A
Requirements
Abbreviations & Acronyms
|
ACL |
Atkins China Limited |
|
|
Action Level |
|
CEDD |
Civil Engineering and Development Department |
|
CRIII |
Central Reclamation Phase III |
|
DO |
Dissolved Oxygen |
|
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
|
EIAO |
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance |
|
EM&A |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit |
|
EPD |
Environmental Protection Department |
|
ER |
Engineer’s Representatives |
|
ET |
Environmental Team |
|
IEC |
Independent Environmental Checker |
|
LCSD |
Leisure and Cultural Services Department |
|
LCSVO-JV |
|
|
LL |
Limit Level |
|
PLA |
People's Liberation Army Forces |
|
TDD |
Territory Development Department |
|
TSP |
Total Suspended Particulates |
|
SS |
Suspended Solids |
|
WMP |
Waste Management Plan |
Executive Summary
The Central Reclamation Phase III (CRIII) Works, Contract No. HK 12/02, was
awarded to Leighton China State Van Oord Joint
Venture (LCSVO-JV) by the Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD). (Previously called the Territory Development Department before
merger with the Civil Engineering Department on
The works under the Contract HK 12/02 commenced on
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual for
the CRIII Project.
This is the 21st quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress
Air quality,
noise and water quality monitoring were conducted during this quarter. Weekly environmental site inspections were
also conducted during this reporting quarter.
Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
Forty exceedances of noise were recorded at the City Hall monitoring
station on
The exceedances may have been attributed to the Project works,
possibly due to the concurrent operation of the backhoe and the sheet piling
activity. The Contractor was advised to
schedule the works at the former Queen’s Pier carefully such that the backhoe
operation and the sheeting piling activity will not be undertaken
concurrently. The Contractor had
rescheduled their works at the former Queen’s Pier to avoid concurrent
operation of the backhoe and vibrating hammer on
The exceedances between 2nd
September and 5th September may have been caused by the drilling
machine penetrating the former seawall during the drilling process. The ET
communicated this with the Contractor on
The exceedances between
8th September and 10th September may have been attributed
to the Project works, possibly due to the concurrent operation of both the
drilling and sheet piling activities. The ET communicated this with the
Contractor representative on
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 38 sampling days in this
reporting quarter. All exceedances have
been investigated and the exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS that
occurred on
Complaint Log
There were no complaints received in relation to environment impact
during this reporting quarter.
Notifications
of Summons and Prosecutions
There were
no notifications of summons or prosecutions received during this reporting
quarter.
Site Inspection and Audit
Weekly environmental site inspections were carried out during this
quarter. Minor deficiencies noted during
the site inspections were rectified by the Contractor upon receipt of
notification. The observations and findings are oulined
below:
The silt curtain near
caisson 15 was observed detached due to the typhoon which occurred on 6th
August 08. The Contractor was reminded to repair the silt curtain and to check
the other curtain to ensure that they work properly. A skip (situated near the
sub-contractor office at IRAW) containing general waste was observed as overflowing.
The Contractor was reminded to arrange for the skip to be emptied
appropriately.
A part of the access road
was observed dry in the works area of FRAW. The Contractor was reminded to
maintain watering of the access roads to prevent dust emission.
Stagnant water was observed
in the low-lying area near the site entrance of Tun Wo lane. The Contractor was reminded to backfill the
low-lying area as soon as possible. Grey smoke emission was observed from the
bulldozer in the works area of FRAW. The Contractor was reminded to maintain
the equipment properly.
Stagnant water was found in
the unused sedimentation tank. The Contractor was reminded to remove the stagnant
water and to relocate the unused sedimentation tank to avoid water
accumulation. Greyish discharge was observed from existing Culvert J Outfall
during the site inspection.
Chemical waste containers
were placed on the ground without drip trays in the FRAE works area near former
Queen’s Pier. The Contractor was reminded to store the chemical waste in a
designated chemical waste storage area.
Dark smoke emission was
observed from an excavator in the FRAW works area. The Contractor was reminded
to provide appropriate maintenance for equipments to prevent dark smoke
emission.
The surface of the filling
area near pier 10 was not compacted – potential dust emission issues. The Contractor
was reminded to prevent dust emission from the filling area. The Contractor
arranged to compact the surface after the site inspection.
Sand and silt was observed
on the access road near to the public road and site entrance of the Contractor
Office. The Contractor was reminded that vehicle wheel washing should be
undertaken before vehicles leave the site area. In addition, some rubbish was
observed in the site area. The Contractor was reminded to keep the site tidy.
A part of the access roads
in FRAE was observed dry during inspection. The Contractor was reminded to
ensure that access roads are watered appropriately.
The temporary storage area
of sand in IRAE was not compacted (potential dust emission issues). The
Contractor was reminded to prevent dust emission from the site area. Two
chemical containers were placed on the ground without drip trays. The
Contractor was reminded to ensure that chemicals should be placed in the
chemical storage area or to provide drip trays for temporary storage. Part of
the access road at IRAE was observed as dry.
The Contractor was reminded to keep access roads wet
A small pool of water near
the entrance to IRAE could become stagnant. The Contractor was reminded to
prevent fill in the small pool of water near the entrance to IRAE.
A part of the access roads
in FRAE and IRAE were observed as dry with some dust emission noted. The
Contractor was reminded to prevent dust emission from the access roads by
watering. An additional observation was made where muddy discharge was observed
at the outfall of Culvert J from out of the site boundary (from unidentifiable
sources).
No findings were reported.
An additional observation was made where a small amount of muddy discharge was
observed at the outfall of Culvert J from out of the site boundary (from
unidentifiable sources).
The Main Works Contract HK 12/02 for CRIII commenced on
This is the 21st quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
The
Contractor's works programme for the quarter is provided in Annex
E.
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual and
required under Clause 4 of the Variation
of Further Environmental Permit (No. EP-01/122/2003/A) issued to Leighton-China
State-Van Oord Joint Venture in December 2007 for
the CRIII Project. A variation of the Further Environmental Permit for the
Project (EP-01/122/2003/B) was granted on
The works undertaken in the project area
requiring environmental monitoring and audit as identified in the EIA Report
(not including
·
Rockfilling and geotextile layer behind the seawall in
FRAW;
·
Type A filling in FRAW and
FRAE
·
Deep compaction and
surcharging in FRAW
·
Rockfilling behind the seawalls in FRAE;
·
Pre-drilling and piling for
Culvert F
·
Sheet piling and excavation
for Culvert F
·
Structural works for Public
Pier East (Pier No.10);
·
Insitu works for Pumping Stations P6.1 and P7.1
·
Excavation for the MTRC 40
metre EOT;
·
Remedial and outstanding
works at and around Piers 7 & 8, Public Pier West and the CTB;
·
Remedial and outstanding
works at MYS Footbridge;
·
General filling works above
+2.5 mPD in IRAE;
·
Construction of storm and
foul drainage and gullies in hinterlands for Road P2, Road D7, Road D8 and Road
D9 and adjacent to the GPO;
·
Structural works for western
tunnel and excavation for eastern tunnel at Road P2 Underpass;
·
Roadworks along
·
Excavation and structural works for Culvert K extension
– bays 4 to 6
·
Piling for Culvert K
·
Precasting for Culvert K
·
Installation of cooling water mains for Tamar
Development Project at IRAE
The EM&A programme
requires environmental monitoring for air quality, noise, waster quality, waste
management and landscape and visual aspects as specified in the CRIII Project
EIA. The EM&A requirements for each
issue area are described in subsequent sections including:
·
All required monitoring parameters;
·
Action and Limit Levels; and
·
Event-Action Plans.
A summary of
impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 2-1.
Table 2.1
- Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
|
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Duration |
|
TSP |
24-Hour
TSP |
2
Locations |
Once
every 6 days |
During
dust generating construction works |
|
1-Hour
TSP |
2
Locations |
Three
times in every 6 days |
During
dust generating construction works |
|
|
Noise |
Leq (30 mins), L10, L90, |
1
Location |
Continuous
measurements |
Two
weeks before Construction and During Construction |
|
Water
Quality |
Dissolved
Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended
Solids; Turbidity. |
16
Locations |
3
times a week, Mid-ebb/flood tides |
During
Marine Works and for 4 weeks after completion of Marine Works |
|
Waste |
On-Site
Waste Audit |
Active
Work Sites |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
|
On-Site
Waste Inspection |
||||
|
Landscape
and Visual |
Audits
to ensure effective implementation of mitigation measures |
During
Construction |
||
|
General
Site Conditions |
Environmental
Site Inspection |
Works
areas and areas affected by works |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
Additional impact water quality monitoring is required for the marine filling works using “Type A Fill” at FRAW as per Condition 3.3 of EP No. EP-01/122/2003/A, No. EP-01/122/2003/B and No. EP-01/122/2003/C. Monitoring parameters include SS, in situ measurements for DO, temperature, turbidity and salinity at M9, M8, and 4 monitoring stations, respectively. The additional water quality monitoring is conducted by the Contractor and the monitoring results are reported in the EM&A monthly report in accordance with the Additional Water Quality Monitoring Programme certified by the ET and verified by the IEC.
Environmental
Quality Performance Limits for air quality, noise and water quality have been
established as part of the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex
B.
Event Action
Plans for air quality, noise and water quality have been developed as part of
the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex C.
The Contractor
has implemented relevant mitigation measures listed in the EIA Report, EM&A
Manual and Further Environmental Permit.
Drawings showing
the project area and locations of the monitoring stations are provided in Annex
D.
The graphical
plot of air quality monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided
in Annex F.
The graphical
plot of noise monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex
G.
The graphical plot of water
quality monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex
H. The
water quality monitoring
on 6th and
Solid and liquid
waste management was implemented according to the Waste Management Plan during
this reporting quarter.
As the works undertaken during this reporting quarter were mainly
related to reclamation, buildings and infrastructure works, the landscape and
visual impacts are considered to be minimal.
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
Forty exceedances of noise were recorded at the City Hall monitoring
station on
The exceedances may have been attributed to the Project works,
possibly due to the concurrent operation of the backhoe and the sheet piling
activity. The Contractor was advised to
schedule the works at the former Queen’s Pier carefully such that the backhoe
operation and the sheet piling activity will not be undertaken concurrently. The Contractor had rescheduled their works at
the former Queen’s Pier to avoid concurrent operation of the backhoe and
vibrating hammer on
The exceedances between 2nd
September and 5th September may have been caused by the drilling machine
penetrating the former seawall during the drilling process. The ET communicated
this with the Contractor on
The exceedances
between 8th September and 10th September may have been
attributed to the Project works, possibly due to the concurrent operation of
both the drilling and sheeting piling activities. The ET communicated this with
the Contractor representative on
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 38 sampling days in this
reporting quarter. All exceedances have
been investigated and the exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS that
occurred on
All exceedances of Action/Limit Level for DO were considered to have not been related to the Project works. The water quality exceedances during this reporting quarter are summarised in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 - Summary Water Quality Exceedances
from May 2008 to July April 2008
|
Date |
Tide |
Parameter |
Exceedance |
Station |
|||
|
Water Quality Monitoring in Accordance with EM&A Manual |
|||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6 and M12 |
||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M3_M5A, M5B, M6 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B and M5B |
||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B and M11 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11
and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M4B and M8(S/M) |
||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6 M8(S&M), M10(S&M) and M11 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6 M8(S&M), M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
LL |
M10(S&M) |
|||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6 M8(S&M), M10(S&M), M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6 M8(S&M), M10(S&M), M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M8(S&M) and M10(S&M) |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B. M5B, M6, M8(S&M) and M10(S&M) |
|||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M10 (B) |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A and M4B |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M8(S&M), M10(S&M), M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B,
M8(S&M), M11 and M12 |
||||
|
LL |
M1A, M6 and M10(S&M) |
|||||||
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M8(S&M), M10(S&M),
M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
LL |
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B and M6 |
|||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A and M11 |
||||
|
LL |
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M8(S/M), M10(S/M) and M12 |
|||||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M10(B) |
|||||
|
LL |
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M8(S/M), M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
|||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A and M11 |
||||
|
LL |
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M8(S/M), M10(S/M) and M12 |
|||||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M10(B) |
|||||
|
LL |
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M8(S/M), M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
|||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(S/M),
M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(S/M),
M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
LL |
M8 and
M10 |
||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(S/M),
M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M8(S/M), M10(S/M),
M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
LL |
M10 |
||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(S/M), M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(S/M), M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(B), M10(B), M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(B), M10(B), M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M8 (S/M), M8 (B) and M10 (B) |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M5B, M6, M8 (S/M), M8 (B), M10 (B) and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8 (B), M10(B), M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M10(S/M), M8(B), M10(B) and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M10 (B), M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M3_M5A, M4B, M5B and M10(B) |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
SS |
|
M10, M6 and M12 |
||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M5B, M6, M8(B), M10(B), M11
and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
SS |
|
M1A |
||||||
|
LL |
M12 |
|||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
||||
|
SS |
|
M1A and M11 |
||||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
SS |
|
M1A |
||||||
|
LL |
M6 and M12 |
|||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6,
M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11
and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M8(B) and M10(B) |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M5B, M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
SS |
|
M3_M5A and M5B |
||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M8(S/M), M8(B), M10(S/M) and M10(B) |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M8(S/M), M8(B), M10(S/M) and
M10(B) |
|||||
|
SS |
|
M1A and M11 |
||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A |
||||
|
SS |
|
M8 |
||||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
SS |
|
M1A, M8 and M11 |
||||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A |
||||
|
SS |
|
M1A and M5B |
||||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M6, M8(B), M11 and M12 |
||||
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|||||
|
SS |
|
M1A and M5B |
||||||
|
LL |
M6, M11 and M12 |
|||||||
|
Date |
Tide |
Parameter |
Exceedance |
Station |
||||
|
Additional Water Quality Monitoring for “Type A fill” Filling Works
Conducted by the Contractor |
||||||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
LL |
Combined marine impact monitoring
station (AM7-AM9) |
|||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
Combined marine impact monitoring
station (AM7-AM9) |
|||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
Combined marine impact monitoring
station (AM7-AM9) |
|||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
Combined marine impact monitoring
station (AM7-AM9) |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb &
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
Combined marine impact monitoring
station (AM7-AM9) |
|||||
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
Combined marine impact monitoring
station (AM7-AM9) |
|||||
A statistical
analysis (presented in Annex I) of the suspended solids
monitoring results found that the quarterly mean is significantly less than 1.3
times of the ambient mean recorded during the baseline period. This indicates that the Project construction
works did not cause adverse impacts during the reporting period with respect to
the baseline condition.
No non-compliance with regard to site environmental audit was recorded
during the reporting period.
The
Contractor has implemented the following measures to prevent air and water
quality impacts:
·
Contractor has implemented their Drainage Management
Plan to Control Site Run-off for the wet season – actions completed and
underway include: repair and improvement of existing bunds/sandbags on the edge
of the reclamation; installation of additional bunds; compaction of soil
surface and paths where possible to prevent erosion, creation of drainage
channels and soak pits;
·
Provision of a single WetSep
flocculation based water treatment plant and additional settlement tanks to
remove suspended solids from discharge waters;
·
Provision of catch pits to collect spill over from
wheel washing facilities and increased frequency of cleaning of catch-pits; and
·
Water browsing of haul roads and other areas of the
site and covering of stockpiles.
No environmental enquiries were received during this reporting quarter.
No environmental complaints were received
during this reporting quarter.
There was no record of environmental complaints during this reporting
quarter.
There
were no notifications of summons and prosecutions during this reporting
quarter.
During the environmental site inspections conducted within this reporting
quarter, no non-compliances were noted and no prosecutions were received during
this reporting quarter.
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
Forty exceedances of noise were recorded at the City Hall monitoring
station on
The exceedances may have been attributed to the Project works,
possibly due to the concurrent operation of the backhoe and the sheet piling
activity. The Contractor was advised to
schedule the works at the former Queen’s Pier carefully such that the backhoe
operation and the sheeting piling activity will not be undertaken concurrently. The Contractor had rescheduled their works at
the former Queen’s Pier to avoid concurrent operation of the backhoe and
vibrating hammer on
The exceedances between 2nd
September and 5th September may have been caused by the drilling
machine penetrating the former seawall during the drilling process. The ET
communicated this with the Contractor on
The exceedances between
8th September and 10th September may have been attributed
to the Project works, possibly due to the concurrent operation of both the
drilling and sheet piling activities. The ET communicated this with the
Contractor representative on
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 38 sampling days in this
reporting quarter. All exceedances have
been investigated and the exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS that
occurred on