Central Reclamation,
Phase III
Quarterly EM&A
Report No. 22
(November 2008 through
January 2009)
1.2 Project Organisation and
Management Structure
2.1 Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
2.2 Environmental Quality Performance Limits
3.1 Implementation of Environmental Measures
3.2 Environmental Monitoring Locations
3.3 Air Quality Monitoring Results
3.4 Noise Quality Monitoring Results
3.5 Water Quality Monitoring Results
3.6 Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status
3.7 Landscape and Visual Audit
4. Environmental
Complaint and Non-Compliance
4.3 Summary of Actions Taken by the Contractor
4.5 Environmental Complaints and Prosecutions
4.6 Record of Environmental Complaints and Summons
& Prosecutions
List of Annexes
Annex
A Project Organisation/
Contact Information
Annex
B Quality Performance
Limits for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex
C Event and Action Plans
for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex
D Monitoring Stations
Locations
Annex
E Contractor's Works
Programme
Annex
F Graphical
Representation of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
G Graphical
Representation of Noise Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
H Graphical
Representation of Water Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
I Quarterly Assessment
of Construction Impacts on Suspended Solids
List of Tables
Table 2.1 - Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
Table 4.1 - Summary Water Quality Exceedances
from November 2008 to January 2009
Abbreviations & Acronyms
|
ACL |
Atkins China Limited |
|
|
Action Level |
|
CEDD |
Civil Engineering and Development Department |
|
CRIII |
Central Reclamation Phase III |
|
DO |
Dissolved Oxygen |
|
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
|
EIAO |
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance |
|
EM&A |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit |
|
EPD |
Environmental Protection Department |
|
ER |
Engineer’s Representatives |
|
ET |
Environmental Team |
|
IEC |
Independent Environmental Checker |
|
LCSD |
Leisure and Cultural Services Department |
|
LCSVO-JV |
|
|
LL |
Limit Level |
|
PLA |
People's Liberation Army Forces |
|
TDD |
Territory Development Department |
|
TSP |
Total Suspended Particulates |
|
SS |
Suspended Solids |
|
WMP |
Waste Management Plan |
Executive Summary
The Central Reclamation Phase III (CRIII) Works, Contract No. HK 12/02,
was awarded to Leighton China State Van Oord Joint Venture (LCSVO-JV) by the
Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD). (Previously called the
Territory Development Department before merger with the Civil Engineering
Department on
The works under the Contract HK 12/02 commenced on
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual for
the CRIII Project.
This is the 22nd quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress
Air quality,
noise and water quality monitoring were conducted during this quarter. Weekly environmental site inspections were
also conducted during this reporting quarter.
Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
Nineteen exceedances of noise were recorded at the City Hall
monitoring station on 12th,
18th, 19th and
The
exceedances on
The
noise exceedances between the 18th and 19th November 2008
may have been caused by the concurrent operation of drilling activities in the
works area of the former Queen’s Pier. ET communicated this with the Contractor
representative on
The
noise exceedance on
For
the noise exceedances outlined above, it was also suggested that short breaks
between noisy activities be taken as far as practicable. The Contractor was
reminded to provide clear guidelines for the frontline staff to prevent the
undertaking of activities such as drilling without short breaks in the former
Queen’s Pier works area.
Three noise exceedances were
also recorded on
On
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 19 sampling days in this
reporting quarter. All exceedances have
been investigated. All exceedances of Action/Limit Level
for DO were considered to have not been related to the Project works. All
exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS were considered to have not been
related to the Project works.
Complaint Log
There were no complaints received in relation to environment impact
during this reporting quarter.
Notifications
of Summons and Prosecutions
There were
no notifications of summons or prosecutions received during this reporting
quarter.
Site Inspection and Audit
Weekly environmental site inspections were carried out during this
quarter. Minor deficiencies noted during
the site inspections were rectified by the Contractor upon receipt of
notification. The observations and findings are outlined below:
The silt curtain at the mouth of FRAE was observed as not fully attached
during site inspection. The Contractor was reminded to ensure the silt curtain is
installed properly.
A part of the access road was observed dry with dust emission at IRAW.
The contractor was reminded to prevent dust emission from the access roads by
watering.
Some stockpiles of fine
materials at FRAW were not covered entirely by sheeting. The Contractor was
reminded to prevent dust emissions by ensuring stockpiles of dusty materials
are covered entirely by sheeting.
Notification was provided by RE to the Contractor on 2nd
December where it was reported that the silt curtain at FRAW was not installed
appropriately resulting in leakage of silt. Remedial action took place by the
Contractor whereby the silt curtain was properly installed. Appropriate
installation was further clarified during the site inspection with no
discolouration of water outside the silt curtain observed.
Muddy discharge was observed in culvert J near the works area of the
underpass. The muddy discharge was trapped by various silts curtains in the
vicinity of culvert J and no muddy discharge was seen to have dispersed to the
Harbour. The Contractor was reminded to provide additional silt curtains to
ensure such muddy discharge is localised, if muddy discharge is unavoidable.
Further to this, notification was provided by the Contractor on
The notification was provided by RE to the Contractor on 11th
December where it was reported that a large amount of muddy water was being
discharged into Culvert F Temporary Diversion Channel from various work fronts
along the channel. The follow-up observation to this was conducted with the IEC
during this site inspection whereby no muddy water was observed. Further to
this, remedial action took place by the Contractor whereby 2 additional silt
curtains were installed at culvert F near the General Post Office for
precaution. It was reported by the Contractor on
Patches of soil contaminated with oil were observed due to machine
maintenance in the works area of the former Queen’s Pier. The Contractor was
reminded to collect and dispose of the contaminated soils as chemical waste.
Part of the access roads was
observed dry with dust emissions in the works area of former Queen’s Pier. The
Contractor was reminded to prevent dust emissions from the access roads by
sufficient watering.
The loading area was observed dry with dust emission at IRAE. The Contractor
was reminded to prevent dust emissions from the works area by sufficient
watering.
N/A
The Contractor was reminded to cover the stockpiles of dusty material
for the prevention of dust emission during the public holiday period.
N/A
The Main Works Contract HK 12/02 for CRIII commenced on
This is the 22nd quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
The
Contractor's works programme for the quarter is provided in Annex
E.
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual and
required under Clause 4 of the Variation
of Further Environmental Permit (No. EP-01/122/2003/A) issued to Leighton-China
State-Van Oord Joint Venture in December 2007 for the CRIII
Project. A variation of the Further Environmental Permit for the
Project (EP-01/122/2003/B) was granted on
The works undertaken in the project area
requiring environmental monitoring and audit as identified in the EIA Report
(not including
·
Rockfilling and geotextile layer behind the seawall
in FRAW;
·
Type A filling in FRAW and FRAE above +2.5mPD;
·
Surcharging in FRAW and FRAE;
·
Rockfilling behind the seawalls in FRAE;
·
Installation of seawall blocks in FRAE & FRAW;
·
Construction of cantilever slab at caisson;
·
Pre-drilling and piling for Culvert F;
·
Sheet piling, Excavation and Structural works for
Culvert F;
·
Structural works for Public Pier East (Pier No.10);
·
Structural works for the MTRC 40 metre EOT;
·
Remedial and outstanding works at and around Piers
7 & 8, Public Pier West and the CTB;
·
General filling works above +2.5 mPD in IRAE;
·
Construction of storm and foul drainage and gullies
in hinterlands for Road P2, Road D7, Road D8 and Road D9 and adjacent to the
GPO;
·
Structural works for Eastern tunnel and Pump Sump
and sheetpiling for Western Ramp at Road P2 Underpass;
·
Roadworks
along
·
Excavation
and structural works for Culvert K extension ;
·
Precasting
for Culvert K, seawall blocks and retaining wall (offsite);
·
Installation
of cooling water mains for Tamar Development Project at IRAE;
·
Reinstatement
works for Culvert J; and
·
Construction
of New ER Office.
The EM&A
programme requires environmental monitoring for air quality, noise, waster
quality, waste management and landscape and visual aspects as specified in the
CRIII Project EIA. The EM&A
requirements for each issue area are described in subsequent sections
including:
·
All required monitoring parameters;
·
Action and Limit Levels; and
·
Event-Action Plans.
A summary of
impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 2-1.
Table 2.1
- Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
|
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Duration |
|
TSP |
24-Hour
TSP |
2
Locations |
Once
every 6 days |
During
dust generating construction works |
|
1-Hour
TSP |
2
Locations |
Three
times in every 6 days |
During
dust generating construction works |
|
|
Noise |
Leq (30 mins), L10, L90, |
1
Location |
Continuous
measurements |
Two
weeks before Construction and During Construction |
|
Water
Quality |
Dissolved
Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended
Solids; Turbidity. |
16
Locations |
3
times a week, Mid-ebb/flood tides |
During
Marine Works and for 4 weeks after completion of Marine Works |
|
Waste |
On-Site
Waste Audit |
Active
Work Sites |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
|
On-Site
Waste Inspection |
||||
|
Landscape
and Visual |
Audits
to ensure effective implementation of mitigation measures |
During
Construction |
||
|
General
Site Conditions |
Environmental
Site Inspection |
Works
areas and areas affected by works |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
Additional water quality monitoring for the
“Type A fill” filling works was undertaken by the Contractor (LCSVO-JV) in accordance with Condition 3.3 of Environmental Permit No. EP-01/122/2003/C.
Phase 2 monitoring for filling works at FRAW was as conducted on 5th,
7th and 10th November 2008. “Type A fill” filling works
by bottom dumping at FRAW was completed thereafter, therefore the additional
Water Quality Monitoring for Type A filling was ceased from
Environmental
Quality Performance Limits for air quality, noise and water quality have been
established as part of the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex
B.
Event Action
Plans for air quality, noise and water quality have been developed as part of
the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex C.
The Contractor
has implemented relevant mitigation measures listed in the EIA Report, EM&A
Manual and Further Environmental Permit.
Drawings showing
the project area and locations of the monitoring stations are provided in Annex
D.
The graphical
plot of air quality monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided
in Annex F.
The graphical
plot of noise monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex
G.
The graphical plot of water quality
monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex H. The
water quality monitoring at stations M2A, M3_M5A, M4B and M5B on
Solid and liquid
waste management was implemented according to the Waste Management Plan during
this reporting quarter.
As the works undertaken during this reporting quarter were mainly
related to reclamation, buildings and infrastructure works, the landscape and
visual impacts are considered to be minimal.
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
Nineteen exceedances of noise were recorded at the City Hall
monitoring station on 12th, 18th, 19th
and
The
exceedances on
The
noise exceedances between the 18th and 19th November 2008
may have been caused by the concurrent operation of drilling activities in the
works area of the former Queen’s Pier. ET communicated this with the Contractor
representative on
The
noise exceedance on
For
the noise exceedances outlined above, it was also suggested that short breaks
between noisy activities be taken as far as practicable. The Contractor was
reminded to provide clear guidelines for the frontline staff to prevent the
undertaking of activities such as drilling without short breaks in the former
Queen’s Pier works area.
Three noise exceedances were
also recorded on
On
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 19 sampling days in this
reporting quarter. All exceedances have
been investigated. All exceedances of Action/Limit Level
for DO were considered to have not been related to the Project works. All
exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS were considered to have not been
related to the Project works.
The water quality exceedances during this reporting quarter are summarised in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 - Summary
Water Quality Exceedances from November 2008 to January 2009
|
Date |
Tide |
Parameter |
Exceedance |
Station |
|
Water Quality Monitoring in Accordance with EM&A Manual |
|||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M10(B), M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M10(B), M11 and M12 |
||
|
SS |
|
M5B |
|||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M10(B), M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M10(B), M11 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(S/M), M8(B), M10(B), M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(S/M), M8(B), M10(S/M), M10(B), M11
and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M4B, M5B, M6m M8(B) and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(B), M11 and M12 |
||
|
SS |
|
M5B |
|||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
||
|
SS |
|
M6 |
|||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
SS |
|
M6 and M12 |
|||
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M8(B) |
||
|
SS |
|
M3_M5A and M12 |
|||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M10(B) |
|
|
SS |
|
M1A and M11 |
|||
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M8(B) |
|
|
SS |
|
M1A |
|||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A,
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(B), M10(B), M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A,
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(B), M10(B), M11 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A,
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A,
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(B), M11 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-flood |
SS |
|
M6 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M2A |
|
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M4B and M5B |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M6, M10(B), M11 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M4B, M5B, M6 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M4B, M6 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6
and M12 |
|
|
Mid-flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
Additional Water
Quality Monitoring Conducted by the Contractor |
||||
|
|
Mid-ebb |
SS |
|
Combined marine impact monitoring station (AM1-AM3) |
A statistical
analysis (presented in Annex I) of the suspended solids
monitoring results found that the quarterly mean is significantly less than 1.3
times of the ambient mean recorded during the baseline period. This indicates that the Project construction
works did not cause adverse impacts during the reporting period with respect to
the baseline condition.
No non-compliance with regard to site environmental audit was recorded
during the reporting period.
The
Contractor has implemented the following measures to prevent air and water quality
impacts:
·
Contractor has implemented their Drainage
Management Plan to Control Site Run-off for the wet season – actions completed
and underway include: repair and improvement of existing bunds/sandbags on the
edge of the reclamation; installation of additional bunds; compaction of soil
surface and paths where possible to prevent erosion, creation of drainage
channels and soak pits;
·
Provision of a single WetSep flocculation
based water treatment plant and additional settlement tanks to remove suspended
solids from discharge waters;
·
Provision of catch pits to collect spill over from
wheel washing facilities and increased frequency of cleaning of catch-pits; and
·
Water browsing of haul roads and other areas of the
site and covering of stockpiles.
No environmental enquiries were received during this reporting quarter.
No environmental complaints were received
during this reporting quarter.
There was no record of environmental complaints during this reporting
quarter.
There were no notifications of summons and
prosecutions during this reporting quarter.
During the environmental site inspections conducted within this reporting
quarter, no non-compliances were noted and no prosecutions were received during
this reporting quarter.
No exceedance in TSP level was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
Nineteen exceedances of noise were recorded at the City Hall
monitoring station on 12th, 18th, 19th
and
The
exceedances on
The
noise exceedances between the 18th and 19th November 2008
may have been caused by the concurrent operation of drilling activities in the
works area of the former Queen’s Pier. ET communicated this with the Contractor
representative on
The
noise exceedance on
For
the noise exceedances outlined above, it was also suggested that short breaks
between noisy activities be taken as far as practicable. The Contractor was
reminded to provide clear guidelines for the frontline staff to prevent the
undertaking of activities such as drilling without short breaks in the former
Queen’s Pier works area.
Three noise exceedances were
also recorded on
On
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 19 sampling days in this reporting
quarter. All exceedances have been
investigated. All exceedances of Action/Limit Level for DO
were considered to have not been related to the Project works. All exceedances
of Action/Limit Level for SS were considered to have not been related to the
Project works.