Central Reclamation, Phase III
Quarterly EM&A Report No. 23
(February 2009 through April 2009)
1.2 Project Organisation and
Management Structure
2.1 Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
2.2 Environmental Quality Performance Limits
3.1 Implementation of Environmental Measures
3.2 Environmental Monitoring Locations
3.3 Air Quality Monitoring Results
3.4 Noise Quality Monitoring Results
3.5 Water Quality Monitoring Results
3.6 Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status
3.7 Landscape and Visual Audit
4. Environmental
Complaint and Non-Compliance
4.3 Summary of Actions Taken by the Contractor
4.5 Environmental Complaints and Prosecutions
4.6 Record of Environmental Complaints and Summons & Prosecutions
List of Annexes
Annex
A Project Organisation/
Contact Information
Annex
B Quality Performance
Limits for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex
C Event and Action Plans
for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex
D Monitoring Stations
Locations
Annex
E Contractor's Works
Programme
Annex
F Graphical Representation
of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
G Graphical Representation
of Noise Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
H Graphical Representation
of Water Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
I Quarterly Assessment of
Construction Impacts on Suspended Solids
List of Tables
Table 2.1 - Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
Table 4.1 - Summary Water Quality Exceedances from November 2008 to
January 2009
Abbreviations & Acronyms
|
ACL |
Atkins China Limited |
|
|
Action Level |
|
CEDD |
Civil Engineering and Development Department |
|
CRIII |
Central Reclamation Phase III |
|
DO |
Dissolved Oxygen |
|
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
|
EIAO |
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance |
|
EM&A |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit |
|
EPD |
Environmental Protection Department |
|
ER |
Engineer’s Representatives |
|
ET |
Environmental Team |
|
IEC |
Independent Environmental Checker |
|
LCSD |
Leisure and Cultural Services Department |
|
LCSVO-JV |
|
|
LL |
Limit Level |
|
PLA |
People's Liberation Army Forces |
|
TDD |
Territory Development Department |
|
TSP |
Total Suspended Particulates |
|
SS |
Suspended Solids |
|
WMP |
Waste Management Plan |
Executive Summary
The Central Reclamation Phase III (CRIII) Works, Contract No. HK 12/02,
was awarded to Leighton China State Van Oord Joint Venture (LCSVO-JV) by the
Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD). (Previously called the
Territory Development Department before merger with the Civil Engineering
Department on
The works under the Contract HK 12/02 commenced on
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual for
the CRIII Project.
This is the 23rd quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress
Air quality, noise
and water quality monitoring were conducted during this quarter. Weekly environmental site inspections were
also conducted during this reporting quarter.
Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
No exceedance in TSP level
was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
35 exceedances in noise level
were recorded at the City Hall monitoring station during February 2009 of the
reporting period. Based on the observation and Contractor record, drilling and
sheet piling activities were being undertaken in the works area of the former
Queen’s Pier during the monitoring period.
Therefore, the exceedances may have been attributed to the Project
works, possibly due to the concurrent operation of both the drilling and sheet
piling activities.
ET communicated exceedances to
the Contractor representative accordingly and it was suggested that the
Contractor schedule the construction activities at the former
Queen’s Pier carefully and that
concurrent operation of both the drilling and sheet piling activities should be
avoided. Following three such notifications, a meeting was scheduled and held
on
Further mitigation measures were carried out, whereby
the Contractor representative provided guidelines to frontline staff to
continue with previous guidelines and to also stagger lunch breaks to avoid
such exceedances. Furthermore, additional noise mats were installed at existing
noise barrier. A review of noise data from
On
Water quality
exceedances were recorded on 30 sampling days in this reporting quarter. All exceedances have been investigated. All exceedances of Action/Limit Level for DO
were considered to have not been related to the Project works. All exceedances
of Action/Limit Level for SS were considered to have not been related to the
Project works.
Complaint Log
There were no
complaints received in relation to environment impact during this reporting
quarter.
Notifications
of Summons and Prosecutions
There were no
notifications of summons or prosecutions received during this reporting
quarter.
Site Inspection and Audit
Weekly environmental site inspections were carried out during this
quarter. Minor deficiencies noted during
the site inspections were rectified by the Contractor upon receipt of
notification. The observations and findings are outlined below:
A stockpile was observed without cover near P2 roads work area in IRAE.
The contractor was reminded to cover stockpiles when unused.
N.A.
N.A.
·
Dark smoke emission was observed from the air
compressor in the FRAW works area. The Contractor was reminded to maintain and
inspect equipment appropriately to prevent smoke emission.
·
Muddy water was found on the caisson surface near
the mouth of Culvert J and brownish water was also observed near the mouth of
Culvert J. The investigation revealed that the muddy water was due to the
unloading of materials from the barge during the morning of
N.A.
·
Rubbish was trapped by the silt curtain in the
culvert F. The Contractor was reminded to collect rubbish at culvert F
regularly.
·
The additional silt curtains installed at the sea
opening in FRAW were not installed appropriately. The Contractor was reminded
to install and maintain the additional silt curtains at the sea opening in FRAW
appropriately to ensure efficient functioning.
N.A.
N.A.
·
A patch of contaminated soil was observed in the
work area of CR16 due to relocation of a generator. The Contractor was reminded
to collect and dispose of the contaminated soil as chemical waste.
·
Drums containing chemicals were stored without drip
trays in the works area of
·
Silt was observed on the public road at the site
entrance on
·
Some general refuse including wood material was
observed in the works area at IRAE. The Contractor was reminded to collect
refuse regularly and to ensure site tidiness.
·
A container of unidentifiable liquid was found near
the access road of IRAE. The Contractor was reminded to treat and dispose of
the container of unidentifiable liquid as chemical waste.
·
Muddy water was observed upstream of Culvert F
which may be caused by the excavation work in the region. However, no muddy
discharge was observed at the mouth of culvert F at
Muddy water was observed at
Dark smoke emission was
observed from the air-compressor in the FRAW works area. The Contractor was
reminded to maintain and inspect equipment appropriately to prevent dark smoke
emission
N.A.
The Main Works Contract HK 12/02 for CRIII commenced on
This is the 23rd quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
The
Contractor's works programme for the quarter is provided in Annex
E.
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual and
required under Clause 4 of the Variation
of Further Environmental Permit (No. EP-01/122/2003/A) issued to Leighton-China
State-Van Oord Joint Venture in December 2007 for the CRIII
Project. A variation of the Further Environmental Permit for the
Project (EP-01/122/2003/B) was granted on
The works undertaken in the project area
requiring environmental monitoring and audit as identified in the EIA Report
(not including
·
Type A filling in FRAW and FRAE above +2.5mPD;
·
Surcharging in FRAW and FRAE;
·
Rockfilling behind the seawalls in FRAE;
·
Installation of seawall blocks in FRAE & FRAW;
·
Construction of cantilever slab at caisson;
·
Piling for Culvert F;
·
Sheet piling, Excavation and Structural works for
Culvert F;
·
Structural works for Public Pier East (Pier No.10);
·
Structural works for the MTRC 40 metre EOT;
·
General filling works above +2.5 mPD in IRAE;
·
Construction of storm and foul drainage and gullies
in hinterlands for Road P2, Road D7, Road D8 and Road D9 and adjacent to the
GPO;
·
Roadworks
along
·
Excavation
and structural works for Culvert K extension ;
·
Precasting
for Culvert K, seawall blocks and retaining wall (offsite);
·
Installation
of cooling water mains for Tamar Development Project at IRAE;
·
Site
investigation and diaphragm walling for CRIII Protection Works.
The EM&A
programme requires environmental monitoring for air quality, noise, waster
quality, waste management and landscape and visual aspects as specified in the
CRIII Project EIA. The EM&A
requirements for each issue area are described in subsequent sections
including:
·
All required monitoring parameters;
·
Action and Limit Levels; and
·
Event-Action Plans.
A summary of
impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 2-1.
Table 2.1
- Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
|
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Duration |
|
TSP |
24-Hour TSP |
2 Locations |
Once every 6 days |
During dust generating construction
works |
|
1-Hour TSP |
2 Locations |
Three times in every 6 days |
During dust generating construction
works |
|
|
Noise |
Leq (30 mins), L10, L90, |
1 Location |
Continuous measurements |
Two weeks before Construction and
During Construction |
|
Water Quality |
Dissolved Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended Solids; Turbidity. |
16 Locations |
3 times a week, Mid-ebb/flood tides |
During Marine Works and for 4 weeks
after completion of Marine Works |
|
Waste |
On-Site Waste Audit |
Active Work Sites |
Periodically |
During Construction |
|
On-Site Waste Inspection |
||||
|
Landscape and Visual |
Audits to ensure effective
implementation of mitigation measures |
During Construction |
||
|
General Site Conditions |
Environmental Site Inspection |
Works areas and areas affected by
works |
Periodically |
During Construction |
Environmental
Quality Performance Limits for air quality, noise and water quality have been
established as part of the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex
B.
Event Action
Plans for air quality, noise and water quality have been developed as part of
the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex C.
The Contractor
has implemented relevant mitigation measures listed in the EIA Report, EM&A
Manual and Further Environmental Permit.
Drawings showing
the project area and locations of the monitoring stations are provided in Annex
D.
The graphical
plot of air quality monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided
in Annex F.
The graphical
plot of noise monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex
G.
The graphical plot of water quality
monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex H.
Solid and liquid
waste management was implemented according to the Waste Management Plan during
this reporting quarter.
As the works undertaken during this reporting quarter were mainly
related to reclamation, buildings and infrastructure works, the landscape and
visual impacts are considered to be minimal.
No exceedance in TSP level
was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
35 exceedances in noise level
were recorded at the City Hall monitoring station during February 2009 of the
reporting period. Based on the observation and Contractor record, drilling and
sheet piling activities were being undertaken in the works area of the former
Queen’s Pier during the monitoring period.
Therefore, the exceedances may have been attributed to the Project
works, possibly due to the concurrent operation of both the drilling and sheet
piling activities.
ET communicated exceedances to
the Contractor representative accordingly and it was suggested that the
Contractor schedule the construction activities at the former
Queen’s Pier carefully and that
concurrent operation of both the drilling and sheet piling activities should be
avoided. Following three such notifications, a meeting was scheduled and held
on
Further mitigation measures were carried out, whereby
the Contractor representative provided guidelines to frontline staff to
continue with previous guidelines and to also stagger lunch breaks to avoid
such exceedances. Furthermore, additional noise mats were installed at existing
noise barrier. A review of noise data from
On
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 30 sampling days in this
reporting quarter. All exceedances have
been investigated. All
exceedances of Action/Limit Level for DO were considered to have not been
related to the Project works. All exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS were
considered to have not been related to the Project works.
The water quality exceedances during this reporting
quarter are summarised in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 - Summary
Water Quality Exceedances from February 2009 to April 2009
|
Date |
Tide |
Parameter |
Exceedance |
Station |
|
Water
Quality Monitoring in Accordance with EM&A Manual |
|||||
|
|
Mid-Ebb
|
SS |
|
M1A
|
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
|
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
LL |
M11 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M1A,
M3_M5A and M11 |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
|
M5B |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M1A,
M5N, M6, M11 and M12 |
||
|
LL |
M12 |
||||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M1A
and M11 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
|
M5B |
|
|
LL |
M3_M5A |
||||
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M3_M5A |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
|
M3_M5A,
M5B and M6 |
|
|
LL |
M12 |
||||
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A
and M5B |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A,
M6 and M12 |
|
|
SS |
|
M1A,
M6 and M11 |
|||
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M6
and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A,
M6 and M12 |
|
|
SS |
|
M1A
and M3_M5A |
|||
|
LL |
M5B
and M11 |
||||
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M6
and M12 |
||
|
SS |
|
M11 |
|||
|
|
Mid-Flood
|
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
|
M11
and M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M3_M5A
and M5B |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
|
M8
and M11 |
|
|
LL |
M1A |
||||
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M10
and M5B |
||
|
LL |
M3_M5A
and M11 |
||||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
|
M11 |
|
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M3_M5A,
M5B, M6 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M4B |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M5B |
|
|
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M5B |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
LL |
M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
LL |
M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb
|
SS |
|
M3_M5A |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
SS |
|
M1A, M3_M5A and M5B |
|||
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A,
M2A, M3_M5A, M5B and M6 |
|
|
SS |
LL |
M1A |
|||
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M10 |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M1A,
M3_M5A, M5B and M11 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
|
M11 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A,
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
|
M1A
|
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B and M5B |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M5B, M6 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
A statistical
analysis (presented in Annex I) of the suspended solids
monitoring results found that the quarterly mean is significantly less than 1.3
times of the ambient mean recorded during the baseline period. This indicates that the Project construction
works did not cause adverse impacts during the reporting period with respect to
the baseline condition.
No non-compliance with regard to site environmental audit was recorded
during the reporting period.
The
Contractor has implemented the following measures to prevent air and water
quality impacts:
·
Contractor has implemented their Drainage
Management Plan to Control Site Run-off for the wet season – actions completed
and underway include: repair and improvement of existing bunds/sandbags on the
edge of the reclamation; installation of additional bunds; compaction of soil
surface and paths where possible to prevent erosion, creation of drainage
channels and soak pits;
·
Provision of a single WetSep flocculation
based water treatment plant and additional settlement tanks to remove suspended
solids from discharge waters;
·
Provision of catch pits to collect spill over from
wheel washing facilities and increased frequency of cleaning of catch-pits; and
·
Water browsing of haul roads and other areas of the
site and covering of stockpiles.
No environmental enquiries were received during this reporting quarter.
No environmental complaints were received
during this reporting quarter.
There was no record of environmental complaints during this reporting
quarter.
There were no notifications of summons and
prosecutions during this reporting quarter.
During the environmental site inspections conducted within this
reporting quarter, no non-compliances were noted and no prosecutions were
received during this reporting quarter.
No exceedance in TSP level
was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
35 exceedances in noise level
were recorded at the City Hall monitoring station during February 2009 of the
reporting period. Based on the observation and Contractor record, drilling and
sheet piling activities were being undertaken in the works area of the former
Queen’s Pier during the monitoring period.
Therefore, the exceedances may have been attributed to the Project
works, possibly due to the concurrent operation of both the drilling and sheet
piling activities.
ET communicated exceedances to
the Contractor representative accordingly and it was suggested that the
Contractor schedule the construction activities at the former
Queen’s Pier carefully and that
concurrent operation of both the drilling and sheet piling activities should be
avoided. Following three such notifications, a meeting was scheduled and held
on
Further mitigation measures were carried out, whereby
the Contractor representative provided guidelines to frontline staff to
continue with previous guidelines and to also stagger lunch breaks to avoid
such exceedances. Furthermore, additional noise mats were installed at existing
noise barrier. A review of noise data from
On
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 30 sampling days in this
reporting quarter. All exceedances have
been investigated. All exceedances of Action/Limit Level
for DO were considered to have not been related to the Project works. All
exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS were considered to have not been
related to the Project works.