Central Reclamation,
Phase III
Quarterly EM&A
Report No. 24
(May 2009 through July
2009)
1.2 Project
Organisation and Management Struc ture..
2.1 Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
2.2 Environmental Quality Performance Limits
3.1 Implementation of Environmental Measures
3.2 Environmental Monitoring Locations
3.3 Air Quality Monitoring Results
3.4 Noise Quality Monitoring Results
3.5 Water Quality Monitoring Results
3.6 Solid and Liquid Waste Management Status
3.7 Landscape and Visual Audit
4. Environmental
Complaint and Non-Compliance
4.3 Summary of Actions Taken by the Contractor
4.5 Environmental Complaints and Prosecutions
4.6 Record of Environmental Complaints and Summons & Prosecutions
List of Annexes
Annex
A Project Organisation/
Contact Information
Annex
B Quality Performance
Limits for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex
C Event and Action Plans
for Air, Noise and Water Quality
Annex
D Monitoring Stations
Locations
Annex
E Contractor's Works
Programme
Annex
F Graphical Representation
of Air Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
G Graphical Representation
of Noise Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
H Graphical Representation
of Water Quality Monitoring Results
Annex
I Quarterly Assessment of
Construction Impacts on Suspended Solids
List of
Tables
Table 2.1 - Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
Table 4.1 - Summary Water Quality Exceedances from
May 2009 to July 2009
Abbreviations
& Acronyms
|
ACL |
Atkins China Limited |
|
|
Action Level |
|
CEDD |
Civil Engineering and Development Department |
|
CRIII |
Central Reclamation Phase III |
|
DO |
Dissolved Oxygen |
|
EIA |
Environmental Impact Assessment |
|
EIAO |
Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance |
|
EM&A |
Environmental Monitoring and Audit |
|
EPD |
Environmental Protection Department |
|
ER |
Engineer’s Representatives |
|
ET |
Environmental Team |
|
IEC |
Independent Environmental Checker |
|
LCSD |
Leisure and Cultural Services Department |
|
LCSVO-JV |
|
|
LL |
Limit Level |
|
PLA |
People's Liberation Army Forces |
|
TDD |
Territory Development Department |
|
TSP |
Total Suspended Particulates |
|
SS |
Suspended Solids |
|
WMP |
Waste Management Plan |
Executive
Summary
The Central Reclamation Phase III (CRIII) Works, Contract No. HK 12/02,
was awarded to Leighton China State Van Oord Joint Venture (LCSVO-JV) by the
Civil Engineering and Development Department (CEDD). (Previously called the
Territory Development Department before merger with the Civil Engineering
Department on
The works under the Contract HK 12/02 commenced on
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual for
the CRIII Project.
This is the 24th quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
Environmental Monitoring and Audit Progress
Air quality,
noise and water quality monitoring were conducted during this quarter. Weekly environmental site inspections were
also conducted during this reporting quarter.
Exceedance of Action and Limit Levels
No exceedance in TSP level
was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
No exceedance in noise level
was recorded at the City Hall monitoring station during this reporting quarter.
Water quality
exceedances were recorded on 34 sampling days in this reporting quarter. All exceedances have been investigated. All exceedances of Action/Limit Level for DO
were considered to have not been related to the Project works. All exceedances
of Action/Limit Level for SS were considered to have not been related to the
Project works.
Complaint Log
There were no
complaints received in relation to environment impact during this reporting
quarter.
Notifications
of Summons and Prosecutions
There were no
notifications of summons or prosecutions received during this reporting
quarter.
During the 12th May 2009 environmental site inspection, EPD
communicated with the ET and IEC that a report of muddy water near
the works area of FRAE was received on
After
investigation by the Contractor, it was reported that the muddy water was due
to a very high tide on the day (+2.4 mPD) which was higher than the concrete
blocks, resulting in the detachment of some existing silt curtains and
subsequent seepage of muddy water. An additional new curtain to enclose the
seepage was being installed at the time of the observation, however the new
curtain was not long enough to enclose the area. Further to this, an additional
section of silt curtain was added on the same day (28th April 09),
providing appropriate enclosure of seepage. The area was monitored closely by
the Contractor with no further issues noted
Site Inspection and Audit
Weekly environmental site inspections were carried out during this
quarter. Minor deficiencies noted during
the site inspections were rectified by the Contractor upon receipt of
notification. The observations and findings are outlined below:
The access roads
in IRAE and FRAW were observed dry with dust. The Contractor arranged for site
staff to water the access roads appropriately.
Muddy water was
observed near the mouth of culvert F. The source was identified as the piling
activity in the works area of FRAW. Sediment was released from the seabed due
to the piling works which could not be trapped by the silt curtain. The piling
activity was stopped by the Site Supervisor immediately after such observation.
The Contractor suspended the related works until the issue was resolved.
During the 12th May 2009
environmental site inspection, EPD communicated with the ET and IEC
that a report of muddy water near the works area of FRAE was
received on
After investigation by
the Contractor, it was reported that the muddy water was due to a very high
tide on the day (+2.4 mPD) which was higher than the concrete blocks, resulting
in the detachment of some existing silt curtains and subsequent seepage of
muddy water. An additional new curtain to enclose the seepage was being
installed at the time of the observation, however the new curtain was not long
enough to enclose the area. Further to this, an additional section of silt
curtain was added on the same day (28th April 09), providing appropriate
enclosure of seepage. The area was monitored closely by the Contractor with no
further issues noted.
N.A.
N.A.
The refuse skip was observed full (with flies in the vicinity) at the
FRAE works area. The Contractor was reminded to ensure the refuse skip is
cleared regularly and to ensure the surrounding area is clean.
A container of unidentifiable chemicals was placed on the ground without
a drip tray near the refuse skip at the FRAE works area. The Contractor was
reminded to store the container of unidentifiable chemicals in the chemical
storage area appropriately.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
N.A.
The silt curtains at culvert F were detached (due to recent typhoon).
The Contractor was reminded to repair or replace the silt-curtain at culvert F
as soon as possible and to ensure continuous maintenance.
N.A.
The Main Works Contract HK 12/02 for CRIII commenced on
This is the 24th quarterly EM&A Report for the
works specified in Section 1.3 of the CRIII EIA Report. This report summarises the monitoring results
and audit findings of the EM&A program during the reporting period from
The
Contractor's works programme for the quarter is provided in Annex
E.
Atkins China
Limited (ACL) has been commissioned by
CEDD as the Environmental Team (ET) to undertake the Environmental Monitoring
and Audit (EM&A) programme described in the approved EM&A Manual and
required under Clause 4 of the Variation
of Further Environmental Permit (No. EP-01/122/2003/A) issued to Leighton-China
State-Van Oord Joint Venture in December 2007 for the CRIII
Project. A variation of the Further Environmental Permit for the
Project (EP-01/122/2003/B) was granted on
The works undertaken in the project area
requiring environmental monitoring and audit as identified in the EIA Report
(not including
·
Type A filling in FRAW and FRAE above +2.5mPD;
·
Surcharging in FRAW and FRAE;
·
Rockfilling behind the seawalls in FRAE;
·
Construction of cantilever slab at caisson;
·
Piling for Culvert F;
·
Sheet piling, Excavation, Structural works and
backfilling for Culvert F;
·
Structural works for Public Pier East (Pier No.10);
·
Structural works for the MTRC 40 metre EOT;
·
General filling works above +2.5 mPD in IRAE;
·
Construction of storm and foul drainage and gullies
in hinterlands for Road P2, Road D7, Road D8 and Road D9 and adjacent to the
GPO;
·
Roadworks
along
·
Excavation
and structural works for Culvert K extension;
·
Precasting
for Culvert K, seawall blocks and retaining wall (offsite);
·
Installation
of cooling water mains for Tamar Development Project at IRAE;
·
Construction
of staircase structure of Man Yiu Street Footbridge;
·
Site
investigation and diaphragm walling for CRIII Protection Works.
The EM&A
programme requires environmental monitoring for air quality, noise, waster
quality, waste management and landscape and visual aspects as specified in the
CRIII Project EIA. The EM&A
requirements for each issue area are described in subsequent sections
including:
·
All required monitoring parameters;
·
Action and Limit Levels; and
·
Event-Action Plans.
A summary of
impact EM&A requirements is presented in Table 2-1.
Table 2.1
- Summary of Impact EM&A Requirements
|
Parameters |
Descriptions |
Locations |
Frequencies |
Duration |
|
TSP |
24-Hour
TSP |
2
Locations |
Once
every 6 days |
During
dust generating construction works |
|
1-Hour
TSP |
2
Locations |
Three
times in every 6 days |
During
dust generating construction works |
|
|
Noise |
Leq
(30 mins), L10, L90, |
1
Location |
Continuous
measurements |
Two
weeks before Construction and During Construction |
|
Water
Quality |
Dissolved
Oxygen; Salinity; Temp; Suspended
Solids; Turbidity. |
16
Locations |
3
times a week, Mid-ebb/flood tides |
During
Marine Works and for 4 weeks after completion of Marine Works |
|
Waste |
On-Site
Waste Audit |
Active
Work Sites |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
|
On-Site
Waste Inspection |
||||
|
Landscape
and Visual |
Audits
to ensure effective implementation of mitigation measures |
During
Construction |
||
|
General
Site Conditions |
Environmental
Site Inspection |
Works
areas and areas affected by works |
Periodically |
During
Construction |
Environmental
Quality Performance Limits for air quality, noise and water quality have been
established as part of the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex
B.
Event Action
Plans for air quality, noise and water quality have been developed as part of
the Baseline Monitoring Report and are provided in Annex C.
The Contractor
has implemented relevant mitigation measures listed in the EIA Report, EM&A
Manual and Further Environmental Permit.
Drawings showing
the project area and locations of the monitoring stations are provided in Annex
D.
The graphical
plot of air quality monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided
in Annex F.
The graphical
plot of noise monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex
G.
The graphical plot of water quality
monitoring results for this reporting quarter is provided in Annex H.
Solid and liquid
waste management was implemented according to the Waste Management Plan during
this reporting quarter.
As the works undertaken during this reporting quarter were mainly
related to reclamation, buildings and infrastructure works, the landscape and
visual impacts are considered to be minimal.
No exceedance in TSP level
was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
No
exceedance in noise level was recorded at City Hall monitoring stations during
this reporting quarter.
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 34 sampling days in this
reporting quarter. All exceedances have
been investigated. All
exceedances of Action/Limit Level for DO were considered to have not been
related to the Project works. All exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS were
considered to have not been related to the Project works.
The water quality exceedances during this reporting
quarter are summarised in Table 4.1.
Table 4.1 - Summary
Water Quality Exceedances from May 2009 to July 2009
|
Date |
Tide |
Parameter |
Exceedance |
Station |
|
Water Quality Monitoring in Accordance with EM&A Manual |
|||||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
LL |
M10 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M6, M8, M10 and M11 |
||
|
LL |
M12 |
||||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
SS |
|
M1A
and M11 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
SS |
|
M6 |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A and M4B |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B and M11 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A
and M11 |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M2A and M4B |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A and M4B |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6 and M12 |
|
|
SS |
|
M5B |
|||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M2A, M4B and M5B |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A and M6 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M6 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6 and M11 |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M5B
and M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A,
M3_M5A, M4B, M5B and M6 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M6, M10(S/M) and M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(S/M), M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A,
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B and M11 |
|
|
SS |
|
M6 |
|||
|
LL |
M12 |
||||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A and M4B |
|
|
SS |
LL |
M12 |
|||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M8(B) and M10(B) |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M4B, M6, M8(B) and M10(B) |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(S/M), M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M8(S/M), M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
||
|
LL |
M6 |
||||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M8(S/M), M11 and M12 |
||
|
LL |
M6 |
||||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M8(B) and M10(B) |
|
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M4B, M6 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M8(B), M10(B), M10(S/M), M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M5B, M6, M8(B), M10(B), M10(S/M) and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M3_M5A, M5B, M6, M11 and
M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A, M3_M5A, M4B and M5B |
|
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M4B and M11 |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M12 |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
||
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M1A, M2A, M3_M5A, M4B, M5B, M6, M11 and M12 |
|
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M10(B) |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M2A
and M4B |
||
|
|
Mid-Ebb |
DO |
|
M8(B) |
|
|
Mid-Flood |
DO |
|
M6,
M8(B) and M10(B) |
||
A statistical
analysis (presented in Annex I) of the suspended solids
monitoring results found that the quarterly mean is significantly less than 1.3
times of the ambient mean recorded during the baseline period. This indicates that the Project construction
works did not cause adverse impacts during the reporting period with respect to
the baseline condition.
No non-compliance with regard to site environmental audit was recorded
during the reporting period.
The
Contractor has implemented the following measures to prevent air and water quality
impacts:
·
Contractor has implemented their Drainage
Management Plan to Control Site Run-off for the wet season – actions completed
and underway include: repair and improvement of existing bunds/sandbags on the
edge of the reclamation; installation of additional bunds; compaction of soil
surface and paths where possible to prevent erosion, creation of drainage
channels and soak pits;
·
Provision of additional settlement tanks to remove
suspended solids from discharge waters;
·
Provision of catch pits to collect spill over from
wheel washing facilities and increased frequency of cleaning of catch-pits; and
·
Water browsing of haul roads and other areas of the
site and covering of stockpiles.
No environmental enquiries were received during this reporting quarter.
No environmental complaints were received
during this reporting quarter.
During the 12th May 2009 environmental site inspection, EPD
communicated with the ET and IEC that a report of muddy water near
the works area of FRAE was received on
After
investigation by the Contractor, it was reported that the muddy water was due
to a very high tide on the day (+2.4 mPD) which was higher than the concrete
blocks, resulting in the detachment of some existing silt curtains and
subsequent seepage of muddy water. An additional new curtain to enclose the
seepage was being installed at the time of the observation, however the new
curtain was not long enough to enclose the area. Further to this, an additional
section of silt curtain was added on the same day (28th April 09),
providing appropriate enclosure of seepage. The area was monitored closely by the
Contractor with no further issues noted
There was no record of environmental complaints during this reporting
quarter.
There were no notifications of summons and
prosecutions during this reporting quarter.
During the environmental site inspections conducted within this
reporting quarter, no non-compliances were noted and no prosecutions were
received during this reporting quarter.
No exceedance in TSP level
was recorded at the two monitoring stations during this reporting quarter.
No exceedance in noise level was recorded at City Hall
monitoring station during this report quarter.
Water quality exceedances were recorded on 34 sampling days in this
reporting quarter. All exceedances have
been investigated. All exceedances of Action/Limit Level
for DO were considered to have not been related to the Project works. All
exceedances of Action/Limit Level for SS were considered to have not been
related to the Project works.